Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Monocular/Binocular/Spotting scope for ~100 yard range target viewing [update]

Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:59 am
Posted by DeoreDX
Member since Oct 2010
4055 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:59 am
Couple of times I've gone to the range without a scoped rifle and realized I can't see the holes in a paper target too far beyond 30 yards depending on the caliber. Maybe up to 40-50 with a splatter target and a large caliber. I can see everything fine out of a 12x scope but taking a rifle with a 12x scope just for looking at bullet holes is a PITA.

I have some 8x25 Nikon binoculars. Haven't tried them at the range yet but for 100 yard shots I think it's still going to be inadequate.

I have a $100 Amazon gift card left over from Christmas. Thinking I might put it towards something useful. Anyone use a binocular/monocular in place of a spotting scope on ~100 yard ranges? I don't see myself ever using them beyond 100 yards as the long distance range I shoot at has electronic targets. A good set of Binoculars or a monocular might have more use than just at the range. Not sure how well they would work for my intended purpose though. Any suggestions? I don't have to keep it under the $100 price tag of the gift card but I would prefer the price to be closer to $100 than $200+

Or should I fork down the $200+ on a decent if unspectacular spotting scope?
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 7:19 am
Posted by Barf
EBR
Member since Feb 2015
3727 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:05 am to
Vortex 10x42 and a tripod

LINK
Posted by nismosao
Slidell
Member since Mar 2008
895 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:17 am to
Konus Spotting Scope

Have this and love it for 100 yard range.
Posted by DeoreDX
Member since Oct 2010
4055 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Konus Spotting Scope

Have this and love it for 100 yard range.


That Konus was actually at the top of my lift for cheap spotting scopes. Didn't know if I could get away with binoculars or a monocular instead. Not sure the Voretex 10x36 monocular would give me enough detail at 100 yards.

For Binoculars I was looking at Redfield too as I trust the brand for low cost optics.

Redfield 10x50 Binoculars
Posted by DownSouthDave
Beau, Bro, Baw
Member since Jan 2013
7377 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:22 am to
I have a shitty Burris spotting scope. It was free with a scope.

Id spend the money on decent quality wether you get a spotting scope or use binos on a tripod. I would suggest opening up the budget. A shitty spotting scope isnt worth using.
Posted by CHEDBALLZ
South Central LA
Member since Dec 2009
21934 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:25 am to
Posted by nismosao
Slidell
Member since Mar 2008
895 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 11:27 am to
The Konus is legit as far as quality goes.
Posted by DeoreDX
Member since Oct 2010
4055 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 8:48 am to
I had talked myself into getting the Konus 80mm spotting scope. Did a lot of reading up on it and I kept seeing it compared to the Celestron 80mm spotting scope. I recognize the Celestron name from higher end astronomy telescopes. They seem to be very highly regarded in the birding and astronomy communities. I saw Optics Planet put the 80mm with tripod on sale for $142 and you can buy from Optics Planet through Amazon so I could use my gift card. The one feature that really pushed me towards the Celestron instead of the Konus was the fact you can use a standard telescopic T-ring to camera adapter to mount an interchangeable lens camera directly to the scope. Obviously a feature born from Celestron's astronomy background. As a photography enthusiast that feature is really appealing to me as it open up digiscoping/astrophotography for me so this will definitely see use outside of the shooting range.



Couple of other products I considered. One was a Lens2Scope adapter. On Amazon for $79 I could convert one of my Nikon F mount telephoto lenses into a scope. It is supposed to give you focal length/10 magnification. My longest F mount manually operated lens is 200mm so it would have been a 20x magnification spotting scope. I have a 300mm but it's of pretty low quality. Probably still better quality than the glass I would get in a cheap spotting scope. Might be a interesting option for photography equipment owning folks looking to use their investment of high end phtography glass as a spotting scope.

https://www.tobiashjorth.com/lens2scope-10mm-14-eyepiece-review/



To get ED glass in a spotting scope you are looking at a minimum $400-500. ED glass is what is used in high end optics. When you bend light through a lens some wavelengths bend differently from others and that causes the purple fringing and loss of detail at high magnification. You could get a Nikon 300 F4.5 ED-IF used for about $200 spend $79 on the lens2scope adapter and get a "30x70mm" spotting scope using some of the best glass money can buy. The 300 f4.5 ED-IF was a $900+ lens when it was new in the 80's/90's dollar. I did seriously consider this route too. If I run across a cheap used copy of the 300 f4.5 ED or ED-IF I'll probably buy it just to try this out.

Another option I considered was a reflex/mirror spotting scope also by Celestron on sale at Optics planet for $132. Celestron C90 would come with two eye pieces (12.5mm and 32mm) giving you 39x and 100x magnification. A mirror design has the advantage of bouncing light instead of bending it do you won't get the detail losing effects that bending light through non-ED glass makes so you get a more detailed sharper image. They are sharper and more detailed but not as "bright". The C90 gets nothing but great reviews. All metal constructed it's large and heavy compared to a traditional glass not mirrors spotting scope. Also can use a standard T ring to attach a camera. There are some pretty spectacular moon crater photos made from this combination. I decided I wanted brightness and smaller size v. magnification and clarity.

Will post an update when I get the scope in. Ordered the scope and a T-ring to Micro 4/3 adapter. Going with the Micro 4/3 over my Nikon because the Micro 4/3 has a 5 axis in body stabilization which should really take away a lot of the shake of the scope at high power. Also, With my E-M1 I can leave the camera on way off to the side, wifi connect the camera to my phone and view a live feed of the targets on my phone without having to take up range bench space with a spotting scope.
Posted by NOLAGT
Over there
Member since Dec 2012
13540 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 10:00 am to
Lots of good info. I like that the one you got you can hook a dslr too. I have a d90 I could use for something like that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram