Started By
Message

re: Constitutional Carry shot down again

Posted on 5/11/17 at 9:43 am to
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 9:43 am to
Good. With all the damn ammo hoarding tactical life loving pillow fort building jackasses we have around here the last thing we need is for them to have another excuse to pack.
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11876 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:


Online application took 10 minutes and they now use your drivers license photo. Finger prints took maybe 30 minutes. I had my CCL in less than a month.


Even you an admit it has been wildly inconsistent. It has seemed to speed up some lately but around this time last year it was a few months wait.

I got my renewal in the fall and it took close to 4 months for me to get the permit in my hand.

I'm happy the system is getting faster but you're simply showing that the system determines the speed of you getting to exercise a constitutional right, insufficiency and all.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 9:52 am to
The slower and more difficult it is, the better.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16539 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:10 am to
That's a stupid thing to say.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:15 am to
Stupid? How so?
Posted by dlambe5
Prairieville
Member since Jul 2009
625 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:15 am to
I was fortunate enough to do mine when the online application process just started. I got in before the wave of people doing it.
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38727 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:19 am to
I keep my conceal carry license on display in Washington.

Posted by northern
Member since Jan 2014
1360 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:34 am to
quote:

I wish they put the names of the Reps who deferred

LINK

Yeah = Defer (opposed the bill)

Mack, Sherman Q. (R) HD 95: Nay
Pylant, Steve E. (R) HD 20: Nay
Bacala, Tony (R) HD 59: Absent
Bagneris, John H. (D) HD 100: Yea
Carpenter, Barbara (D) HD 63: Yea
Crews, Raymond J. (R) HD 8: Nay
Dwight, Stephen (R) HD 35: Absent
Gaines, Randal L. (D) HD 57: Yea
Hazel, Lowell C. "Chris" (R) HD 27: Absent
Hodges, Valarie (R) HD 64: Nay
Howard, Frank A. (R) HD 24: Yea
James, Edward C. "Ted" (D) HD 101: Yea
Landry, Terry (D) HD 96: Yea
Marcelle, Denise (D) HD 61: Yea
Marino, Joseph (I) HD 85: Yea
Norton, Barbara M. (D) HD 3: Absent
Stefanski, John M. (R) HD 42: Nay

Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16539 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:35 am to
What is gained by making the process more difficult?
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:40 am to
Fewer people doing it, and those who choose to do so are probably going to be a bit more responsible.
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38727 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Howard, Frank A. (R) HD 24: Yea


That's a Vernon Parish baw. He may have the R by his name, but those poor folks down there are all democrats at heart.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16539 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Fewer people doing it, and those who choose to do so are probably going to be a bit more responsible.



Love to see the empirical data backing up your opinion.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:54 am to
Me too
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16539 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:57 am to
Good luck, doesn't exist. Usually the case with notions that have poor foundation of logic supporting them.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

doesn't exist.
I know.
quote:

have poor foundation of logic supporting them.

You're dumber than I thought if you think this.
Posted by northern
Member since Jan 2014
1360 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Clyde Tipton


Also a former Sheriff. LSA opposed the bill.
Pylant (R) another former Sheriff voted in support.
Bacala (R), former APSO Chief Deputy took a walk.
And Landry (D) former LSP Superintendent voted against.
Posted by northern
Member since Jan 2014
1360 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:08 am to
Point being, if the vote went along party lines with no absences, even with Marino (I) voting against it would have passed 9-8.

The folks that should be held accountable are:
Bacala, Tony (R) HD 59: Absent 
Dwight, Stephen (R) HD 35: Absent 
Hazel, Lowell C. "Chris" (R) HD 27: Absent 
Howard, Frank A. (R) HD 24: Yea 
Marino, Joseph (I) HD 85: Yea 
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16539 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:11 am to
quote:

You're dumber than I thought if you think this.


Morons like you use the same nonsense with concealed carry that rabid gun-control advocates use for gun ownership in general. Somehow you believe that if you make something hard enough or expensive enough then only the "truly responsible" will engage in owning or carrying guns. How stupid does one have to be to believe in such an opinion as yours when there is no data to back it up?
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:26 am to
Nah, it's really very simple. If it's easy to do, more people will do it. Your need for data simple shows the weakness of your mind. You truly cannot think. It's sad really.
Posted by Pepperidge
Slidell
Member since Apr 2011
4311 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:33 am to
quote:

I wish they put the names of the Reps who deferred


And the names of the groups who lobbied against it...LA Sheriffs association was a main culprit last time...

unfortunately there are some LEO's who would have you believe they should be the only ones to freely exercise this constitutional right...and then there are those who teach CCW classes who don't want to get off the gravy train...I know a couple guys that make a nice living off this side hustle, and when I mentioned supporting constitutional carry, they scoffed at losing that revenue and said they'd call their representative to oppose it...disgusting to put themselves over others God given rights.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram