Started By
Message

re: Anderson rifles and RF85 technology

Posted on 9/8/16 at 7:21 pm to
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16656 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

This will be my first AR. I'm a little uncomfortable with the no oil and no solvent cleaning deal.


I would still wipe down the BCG parts with a solvent cleaner and treat the chamber and bore as I would any other rifle. When it comes to lube I would just run it dry and see how it does. I've seen testing where a DSL treated AR went thousands of rounds with so little wear on the carrier rails and bolt that it would probably be indistinguishable from brand new parts.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16931 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 11:47 pm to
Appreciate your input.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35900 posts
Posted on 9/9/16 at 12:36 am to
I have two Anderson ARs and I lubed them both up. I don't trust any of that crap.
This post was edited on 9/9/16 at 2:14 pm
Posted by SlideStop
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
80 posts
Posted on 9/9/16 at 8:42 am to
quote:

I have two Anderson ARs and I lived them both up. I don't trust any of that crap.


Most of the Anderson rifles sold do NOT have the RF85 coating.
It's an add-on and your reciever would have the RF85 markings.



Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35900 posts
Posted on 9/9/16 at 2:15 pm to
Yeah, mine don't have those markings.

Good thing I lubed them up.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram