Started By
Message
locked post

I'm feeling guilty over this...

Posted on 5/30/10 at 8:42 am
Posted by FTBLFN
Nashville, TN
Member since Jan 2010
5399 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 8:42 am
I drive a Dodge Ram 1500 4x4...18 mpg on a good day. I also have a bass boat, pull behind camper, and ATV with trailer that bring the mileage down even more and need their own gasoline.

The love of oil and the reckless way it's used has created this need, and demand has caused these companies to go out and get it...obviously without any definite plans in place to stop leaks or perform cleanup.

I know everyone is pissed at BP, but we've all played a small role in this too.

Now I'm thinking about getting one of those electric Nissan Leaf cars when they come out in a couple of months. It's a good thing the Nashville are is putting in recharging stations.

Oil has caused us so many problems - wars, natural disasters, pollution - I'll just be glad when we're done with it.
This post was edited on 5/30/10 at 8:43 am
Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
21969 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Now I'm thinking about getting one of those electric Nissan Leaf cars when they come out in a couple of months.


ever thought about riding on a 747 that was battery opperated?


while you are at it, you might as well throw everything in your possession that is made of plastic, rubber, pvc, ink, paint, and a host of other petroleum products.

matter of fact, if it's not glass or wood (unpainted), you can throw it.



fricking hippies.
they will never get it.

Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22784 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 9:06 am to
quote:

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I'm thinking about getting one of those electric Nissan Leaf cars when they come out in a couple of months.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ever thought about riding on a 747 that was battery opperated?


while you are at it, you might as well throw everything in your possession that is made of plastic, rubber, pvc, ink, paint, and a host of other petroleum products.

matter of fact, if it's not glass or wood (unpainted), you can throw it.



fricking hippies.
they will never get it.


Toke the words right out of my mouth. Anyone that post anything on the internet that says oil is evil etc etc. is a hypocrite. What they are saying is that they use oil too but they are green and you are evil because you use more than them. Leaf is not green. Nothing is green. It uses electricity and you can't use anything electric unless you are ok with using fossil fuels. Wire coating is made from petroleum.
This post was edited on 5/30/10 at 9:12 am
Posted by subMOA
Komatipoort
Member since Jan 2010
1718 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 9:11 am to
Man, there is no guilt necessary, there is another way. I write this post from Brazil....I work in the biofuels industry. Specifically, I work on the harvest side of things. 30 Years ago, Brazil decided to be energy independant and today, most of their fuel comes from ethanol from sugarcane, biodiesel from soybeans, and the oil that they need comes domestically offshore production.

I can guarantee you that we can do the same in the US. We need to forget about corn ethanol for a moment and look at other crops. We are doing this today. The technology for cellulosic ethanol is finally about where it needs to be. This technology is energy balance positive now and is certainly the way for us to go.

It just sucks that we most likely had to witness something like the Horizon disaster to kick us all into gear like Brazil did 30 years ago.

If you don't believe the resources are available in the US, Google the Billion Ton Study done by the USDA and DOE a few years ago.

And....by the way, Brazilians have Yamaha outboards and Honda dirtbikes that run just fine over here with lots of ethanol in them.
This post was edited on 5/30/10 at 9:17 am
Posted by WNCTiger
Member since Aug 2006
2883 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 9:12 am to
Ad-hom paired with anger. What the OP says about the cost of oil production, and by proxy, oil intensive lifestyles, is true.

Actually the OP sounds nothing like a hippy to me. Hippies don't typically own 4wd, 4 wheelers, boats, and campers. At least in my experience. Sounds more like a Republican. I didn't read any mention of weed, patchouli, the Grateful Dead, or organic vegetables.

Or his post could be sarcasm intended to illicit angry reactions. Who the hell knows?


LINK
quote:

Getting lost can be traumatic for the rest of us too. When we suddenly realize that we don't know where we are, urgent neural messages are exchanged between our prefrontal cortex, which struggles to form a coherent picture of what's happening, our amygdala, whose job is to hold on to a sense of where we are, and our hippocampus, which motivates us to get back to a place we know as quickly as we possibly can.

This strange bit of internal wiring explains why humans who are only slightly lost tend to trot off in a random direction and promptly become profoundly lost.

After these immediate biochemical reactions have run their course, we go through the usual stages of:

1. denial—"We are not lost! The ski lodge is just over the next ridge, or the next, or the next..."

2. anger—"We are wasting time! Shut up and keep trotting!"

3. bargaining—"The map must be wrong; either that or someone has dynamited the giant boulder that should be right there..."

4. depression—"We'll never get there! We're all going to die out here!" and

5. acceptance—"We are not lost; we are right here, wherever it is. We better find some shelter and start a campfire before it gets dark and cold."

Some people don't survive, some do; the difference in outcome turns out to have precious little to do with skill or training, and everything to do with motivation—the desire to survive no matter how much pain and discomfort that involves—and the mental flexibility to adjust one's mental map on the fly to fit the new reality, and to reach stage 5 quickly. Those who go on attempting to operate based on an outdated mental map tend to die in utter bewilderment.


Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
21969 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 9:15 am to
quote:

Brazil decided to be energy independant and today, most of their fuel comes from ethanol from sugarcane, biodiesel from soybeans, and the oil that they need comes domestically offshore production.


if the u.s. does like brazil, will we be as busy in the gulf as they are off of their coast?

the most offshore drilling in the world is occuring in Brazil.

Posted by subMOA
Komatipoort
Member since Jan 2010
1718 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 9:24 am to
Petrobras is surely the leader in deepwater production. Hence why Chouest is building boats here and everyone else we know has Brazilian oufits also.

If I remember my numbers right, I think about 60% of the fuel used in Brazil is from ethanol and it's growing everyday- we currently produce 550,000,000 million tons of cane here and it will grow to 800,000,000 tons in the next years. This is all w/o getting anywhere near the Amazon- there are laws against growing cane in those areas.
This post was edited on 5/30/10 at 9:25 am
Posted by tigersaint26
In front of my computer
Member since Sep 2005
1509 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 9:47 am to
Maybe the OP just wants to tell us all the stuff he has. This way he can brag about it using the vessel of "Woah Is Me and my Oil using habits".
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38556 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 9:56 am to
Brazil is largely a tropical rainforest and can grow sugar cane like crazy. The thought of using our food to fuel our cars in the US has never seemed like a viable idea to me. We have over 100 years of known natural gas reserves here in the US. If anything, we should be using that source more.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22784 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 9:56 am to
Tree huggers are all hypocrits. They don't get to determine how much evil oil use is acceptable. I DO. And I set it at zero. If they can set their limits I can too. So they all are evil for using more than their limit. Zero tolerance.
Posted by Luke4LSU
Member since Oct 2007
11986 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 10:18 am to
And Brazil chopped down a shite-ton of irreplaceable Amazonian rainforst to plant sugarcane to make ethanol so that they could be "green".

There's no free lunch. EtOH is a net negative environmentally in Brazil.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 10:32 am to
I live in Georgia. Peanut farmers here stand to make a lot of money if we used more biodiesel, for example.

It's not an either/or as several posters have implied on this thread. We DO need to CUT BACK on our oil consumptions, and not just for environmental reasons. We're giving a lot of money to dictatorships in this hemisphere (Venezuela) and elsewhere (the Middle East) because of our oil obsession here. The "drill baby, drill" crowd ignored the risks involved with drilling in our backyard. Sure, stronger regulation would have prevented this current spill, but the drill baby drill crowd are also opposed to regulating the oil industry. As it stands, the people who have been regulating the industry for the last couple of decades have been people FROM the industry. In other words, the inmates were running the asylum (kind of like Wall Street...). That's a recipe for disaster.

The OP has a great point about electric cars or using hybrids. Our major cities should also invest more in mass transit infrastructure development, particularly light rail (which uses electric power). But most importantly, WE AS AMERICANS NEED TO SHIFT OUR THINKING. Particularly in the South, people love their cars and trucks and shite. Take the train to work. Carpool. Try to live in a walking community or closer to the office. Fight against urban sprawl instead of embracing it. shite, do this for no reason other than to avoid sitting in traffic for an hour and a half each morning and afternoon. Your quality of life will improve, and you won't be funding dictators and terrorists to the extent that you are now. Energy independence is both a national security issue and a quality of life issue. We should all be behind it, regardless of party affiliation. Quit all the partisan bullshite and look at it objectively.

Which is better for you and everyone around you, burning more or burning less fossil fuels?

Which is better for you personally, spending more money per month on fuel costs or less?

Heck, ignore the rest of this post and just answer those two questions honestly. Let's drop all the partisan and reactionary nonsense and focus on the issues at hand. Using less oil is beneficial to us as a society, both now and for future generations. Let's work together on that instead finding ways to attack each other.
Posted by FTBLFN
Nashville, TN
Member since Jan 2010
5399 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 11:00 am to
Ha...I'm no hippie.

I simply think anyone who uses gas bears some responsibility for this mess.

Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 11:03 am to
In a global economy, we all have a bit of blame to bear, true. But the bulk of it goes to the criminally negligent regulatory commissions and the criminally negligent corporate entity at the heart of this.
Posted by lsutiger_08
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2005
6683 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 11:13 am to
How was anyone criminally negligent? I haven't heard this yet.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 11:24 am to
I live in a building here in the Warehouse District where at least 50% of the vehicles parked in the garage are large SUV's... I mean LARGE. It's pretty ridiculous, really... this is not a family building (kids need play space) and these people, mostly wives returning from Rouse's, take forever to maneuver their rolling land barges into tight parking spaces.

You know we have an excessive consumption problem when people can't even abandon ostentatious vehicles inside the city where it makes much more sense to have SmartCar-type transportation.

Posted by DA
Member since Sep 2007
16251 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 12:01 pm to
Great post.

One of the reasons I hope President Obama uses his bully pulpit to encourage Americans to conserve. To be smarter with our driving habits. To buy more efficient vehicles.

Fortunately, I believe we can significantly reduce our consumption with little to no sacrifice to our lifestyle. There is a lot of waste in the system. Look around as you drive, how many huge vehicles contain just one person.

Lets put the power of our citizenry to work getting involved in a national effort. It's more than just saving money. It's a national security issue. If our military can die in the middle east, we can drive a smaller car, imv.
This post was edited on 5/30/10 at 12:04 pm
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38556 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 12:05 pm to
If our public transportation system was anything but dismal then maybe more people would be encouraged to drive less.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131437 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Sophandros





paragraph 3 echos what I have been thinking for years.

i can't ever envision life 100% petroleum free, but to say plastics must be petroleum based isn't accurate.

until cold fusion is a reality, fission makes the most sense to me. but the potential for disaster is still there.


Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22784 posts
Posted on 5/30/10 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

but to say plastics must be petroleum based isn't accurate.


Nobody said it had to be... it just is!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram