Started By
Message

re: which major car company makes the least attractive vehicles?

Posted on 12/20/15 at 1:20 pm to
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38483 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 1:20 pm to
2003, 2005, 2012.


Not sure the problems but I know they had to take them to the shop very often. More so than normal vehicles. Each trip to the shop was costing one guy around $1200.
Posted by jordan21210
Member since Apr 2009
13382 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Each trip to the shop was costing one guy around $1200.




Did they buy them new? Or second hand non-CPO?
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
97624 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 1:32 pm to
03 and 05 they were owned by ford. The 12 should be a much better vehicle
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38483 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 1:38 pm to
Two new one second hand.
Posted by jordan21210
Member since Apr 2009
13382 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Two new one second hand.



Assuming warranty expired?

As mentioned 03 and 05 were Ford owned years - not very good. Same thing happened with Aston Martin, quality is reflected in the resale.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram