Started By
Message

re: When, if ever will we have spacecraft that can travel at light speed?

Posted on 2/22/17 at 11:08 pm to
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131378 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 11:08 pm to
are we assuming the speed of light is a constant or variable?


Posted by shotcaller1
Member since Oct 2014
7501 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 11:09 pm to
quote:


What if we developed technology allowing us to travel 1 mph below the speed of light? Could we launch an object forward from, or inside the craft at 2 mph?


Velocities don't add up neatly together when you're near the speed of light due to relativity
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29439 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

So if you left the earth at or near light speed and then tried to come back after a substantial amount of time, you would technically find yourself in the future.
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
60603 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 11:11 pm to
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29439 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

So everyone in the world combined walking distance in their lives could almost make two roundtrips to that new solar system.
So, you're saying we could actually walk to the moon? Like this?


Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131378 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 11:19 pm to
Stephen Hawkings hasn't said anything in 50 years.


Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
60603 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 11:22 pm to
Um, he speaks with his soul, racist bigot
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57681 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 12:41 am to
quote:

When, if ever will we have spacecraft that can travel at light speed?


As dumb as it sounds, Star Trek (and other media) were right in that we will never advance as a species until the entire world works together towards a common goal. We can't even balance a damn federal budget, much less travel close to hyper speed or even dream up a warp engine.

We're talking hundreds of years off from anything like that happening unfortunately. No one posting here will be alive to see it.

We can take solace in the fact that 1900-2020 will have produced as much tech and advancements as it did.

I would be happy if we could just work on our energy problems for now. Current battery life and fossil fuels are horrendously inefficient.
Posted by LSU12223
Member since Sep 2016
1482 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 1:49 am to
Posted by vengeanceofrain
depends
Member since Jun 2013
12465 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 1:53 am to
Black holes bra. U dudes need to refresh on your cosmos series
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 2:08 am to
Just several years ago people thought things like the EmDrive were theoretically and physically impossible. To be fair, I highly doubt that we ever touch anywhere close to actual light speed, but we might find a way to bend spacetime and end up "distorting" the laws that we know on Earth. Probably not in our lifetime and with the caveat that we don't destroy ourselves within the next couple hundred years, then we might be able to eventually reach another solar system in about 40-50 years of travel.
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 2:09 am
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 3:30 am to
quote:

The new galaxy is only 230 trillion miles and 40 light years away!


Um, no. That would be the new exoplanets. Still the same galaxy we're in.

quote:

When, if ever will we have spacecraft that can travel at light speed?


Never. That said, once you really get moving time does slow down. This has been verified to happen exactly as predicted with radioactive nuclei so it isn't just speculation.
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29452 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 4:03 am to
I remember reading something about the large hadron collider and how they could accelerate subatomic particles to a high percentage of the speed of light (like 95% maybe?). But to do the same for an atom they calculated it would require more energy than in our entire solar system combined.

I agree with the previous poster in that we could travel by bending space time before we could accelerate even a negligible mass of matter to the speed of light.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68309 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 4:30 am to
quote:

Light speed is too slow for these insane distances.




Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:42 am to
quote:

When, if ever will we have spacecraft that can travel at light speed?


Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:04 am to
quote:


are we assuming the speed of light is a constant or variable


We may never even be able to know this for certain.
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
14057 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:47 am to
quote:

This. Light speed is too slow for these insane distances.


Light speed too slow?!?

Posted by RonLaFlamme
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
1680 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:50 am to
quote:

This. Light speed is too slow for these insane distances.


Need ludicrous speed.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20747 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Time is experienced relatively. At or near lightspeed, what feels like a few hours or days to you results in (I don't know the exact correlation) possibly years or many, many years having passed elsewhere.


Like most people I have heard about this for years yet it still blows my mind trying to think about it
Posted by Ellssu
Spying North of the Border
Member since Dec 2006
2478 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 8:27 am to
Do you even Einstein's equation... if you did you would know it's impossible.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram