Started By
Message

What kind of airplane crash death would you prefer?

Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:34 am
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23322 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:34 am
Scenario One: The plane is flying along when there is a mechanical defect (like an uncommanded rudder movement) and the plane rolls and dives to the ground. Death occurs 15 to 45 seconds after the roll.

Scenario Two: Some major mechanical malfunction occurs (for example, cargo door blows out or major hydraulic system damage). You'll be in the plane for 20 minutes before it attempts to land. You have hope. You have fear. It lands, some make it but you don't.

Do you prefer the "quick and its over" scenario or the "there is hope" scenario?

In both cases, assume that death is instantaneous on impact.
Posted by bigrob385series
B. Aura
Member since May 2014
2634 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:36 am to
both would suck...so i guess the first one.
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
22157 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:36 am to
How about, frick you
Posted by Bossier2323
Bossier CIty
Member since Sep 2014
1909 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:36 am to
The delayed death. Because I would start raping everyone man and woman on the plane before impact
Posted by Ash Williams
South of i-10
Member since May 2009
18144 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Scenario Two: Some major mechanical malfunction occurs (for example, cargo door blows out or major hydraulic system damage). You'll be in the plane for 20 minutes before it attempts to land. You have hope. You have fear. It lands, some make it but you don't.


if some make it, itd be pretty selfish of me to take the one that only quickens my death

and its not like i know im going to die in either scenario (if i did, i would've taken a bus), so the one that gives me hope of survival seems like the better choice


also affords the opportunity to find a hotty and convince her this could be our last chance to join the mile high club
This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 8:38 am
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:37 am to
I won't care one way or the other afterwards.
Posted by gingerkittie
Member since Aug 2013
2675 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:39 am to
In the 2nd one you say that others survive where in the first one it seems none do. Obviously i want others to survive.

Don't much care if there is hope or it is instant. I made my peace with everything in life, shared my thoughts with my loved ones on how I feel about death and am good with it.

I just don't want a long torturous death such as cancer. Eff that.
Posted by BulldogXero
Member since Oct 2011
9762 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:39 am to
not like this LINK
Posted by rantfan
new iberia la
Member since Nov 2012
14110 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:39 am to
Scenario 2, 15 to 45 seconds is an eternity when you know your going to die.
Posted by JetFuelTyga
Born in desert,raised in lion's den
Member since Feb 2016
1785 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:39 am to
quote:

some make it but you don't


I guess this one? At least some people survive?
Posted by TheAlmightySmash
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2014
5479 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:40 am to
If you're 100% dead either way why prolong it.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59443 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:42 am to
quote:

In both cases, assume that death is instantaneous on impact.




Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23322 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:42 am to
The best way is the way a New Zealand DC 10 flight in Antarctica ended - it just ran into an obscured mountain. No passenger had a clue.

The worst way would be like the JAL airliner passengers where they all knew the plane was going to crash catastrophically, but the plane remained airborne in a yaw and roll for a lengthy period of time.

They even wrote goodbye letters to their loved ones.
Posted by Itismemc
LA
Member since Nov 2008
4714 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:42 am to
I'd rather take the Payne Stewart option.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17118 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:43 am to
This is so dumb. All you have to do is jump up right before the plane hits the ground and you'll land right on your feet safely.

God...read a physics book or something.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:43 am to
I'd prefer the Payne Stewart route. Just fall asleep and cruise around for a couple hours.
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23322 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:45 am to
Helios Air had an airliner that did the same thing.

Everyone conked out except for a flight attendant. Two F 16s sent out by the Greeks saw the guy, who waved at them shortly before the plane ran out of fuel and crashed.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16916 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:45 am to
This question is a paradox. You offer us option two with the carrot that we will have hope, but then tell us we have to answer it with the caveat that we are assured death. So how can we have hope if the condition is that we know we are going to die with certainty?

In a real life scenario, clearly option 2 is preferable because you would theoretically have a chance to survive.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:47 am to
quote:

You'll be in the plane for 20 minutes before it attempts to land. You have hope. You have fear. It lands, some make it but you don't


This one. I could nail a stewardess or kill someone.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94877 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:47 am to
"Aim for a tree, I don't wanna limp away from this."

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram