Started By
Message

re: Waco Biker Update: Autopsy Reports Released... Finally

Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:40 am to
Posted by yurintroubl
Dallas, Tx.
Member since Apr 2008
30164 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:40 am to
quote:



And so just open up into a crowd shooting everyone they see? Gotcha.


I think the number of victims with gunshot residue on their hands would clear that question up nicely.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64685 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Collateral damage
Collateral damage is damage to things that are incidental to the intended target. It is frequently used as a military term where non-combatants are accidentally or unintentionally killed or wounded


so let me get this straight. Let's say you and your wife is in a crowd of people out somewhere and a fight breaks out. You have nothing to do with the fight. So if the cops show up you'd be good with them just opening up firing into that crowd of people and let the chips fall where they may? Are you really this fricking stupid?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64685 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:43 am to
quote:

I think the number of victims with gunshot residue on their hands would clear that question up nicely.



You're correct, it would. So why are they not releasing that information? They let us know who had some pot or meth in their system but they cannot tell who had GSR on their hands?
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 10:44 am
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:45 am to
quote:

I wonder why is was not in the autopsy reports.


did you read the full pdf reports that I linked for each victim?

I know in one of the summary's it states...

quote:

There was no firearm residue on Rodriguez’s skin
Posted by yurintroubl
Dallas, Tx.
Member since Apr 2008
30164 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Why would they leave those details out if there is nothing to hide?




It's possible that an outside agency is doing these tests to make sure there was no cover up, IMO.


ETA:

or verify there was one, I suppose.
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 10:46 am
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:46 am to
quote:

a fight breaks out. You have nothing to do with the fight. So if the cops show up you'd be good with them just opening up firing into that crowd of people and let the chips fall where they may?


thats not what happened....and you know it
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:48 am to
quote:

So why are they not releasing that information?



there is so much that you are over looking? You cant be this fricking stupid can you?


quote:


Police have said the ballistics investigation is being headed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which has possession of more than 475 weapons from the scene, including at least 151 firearms.

The newly released reports do not indicate who killed which men, and most references to bullets refer to projectiles ranging in size from small to large. Gunshot residue kits were submitted for each of the nine killed.



the corner is not going to have that info in his autopsy report
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 10:49 am
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64685 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:49 am to
quote:

a fight breaks out. You have nothing to do with the fight. So if the cops show up you'd be good with them just opening up firing into that crowd of people and let the chips fall where they may?


thats not what happened....and you know it


You honestly think they opened up on the cops?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64685 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:51 am to
Hey fricktard, I've said repeatedly in this thread the ATF is doing the ballistics report. for some odd reason they've had three months to finish it but yet still have yet to do so.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:52 am to
I honestly think gun fire broke out and the cops had no idea where the bullets were going....so in order to protect themselves and others they started taking people out.


Maybe the cops should have just retreated and let them all kill themselves including the innocent people that were eating inside with their families.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:52 am to
quote:

You honestly think they opened up on the cops?



So, in your dimwitted opinion, the cops shouldn't have shot if the bikers were only shooting each other?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64685 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:55 am to
quote:

So, in your dimwitted opinion, the cops shouldn't have shot if the bikers were only shooting each other?




You're about as fricking stupid as Tigerbait8. The cops can break up a fight without shooting wildly into a crowd. Take down the threats who are armed without killing everyone else around them, they're supposed to be trained to do this.
Posted by yurintroubl
Dallas, Tx.
Member since Apr 2008
30164 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:55 am to
quote:


I honestly think gun fire broke out and the cops had no idea where the bullets were going....so in order to protect themselves and others they started taking people out.


Maybe the cops should have just retreated and let them all kill themselves including the innocent people that were eating inside with their families.


THIS
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:56 am to
So, can you prove they didn't do just that?

I'll wait.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64685 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:57 am to
quote:

I honestly think gun fire broke out and the cops had no idea where the bullets were going....so in order to protect themselves and others they started taking people out.


Maybe the cops should have just retreated and let them all kill themselves including the innocent people that were eating inside with their families.


THIS


And in the process a lot of people who did not deserve to die are now dead. Worse yet, almost 200 people who had nothing to do with any of it have had their lives turned upside down and ruined.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Take down the threats who are armed without killing everyone else around them,


maybe that's what they did......how do you know the 9 people that were killed wernt the threats? Even if one or two of them werent, then like I said...collateral damage.



quote:

You're about as fricking stupid as Tigerbait8.


it's tgrbaitn08, not Tigerbait8, thats a fricking stupid username
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 10:59 am to
quote:

a lot of people who did not deserve to die are now dead.


how do you know this?
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 11:00 am to
He's assuming all 9 were shot by officers.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 11:04 am to
quote:

He's assuming all 9 were shot by officers.




quote:

Waco Police Chief Brent Stroman said in June that three Waco officers fired a total of 12 rounds that day.



so 12 rounds killed 9 people that were shot multiple times and

quote:

The melee also injured 20 people



somethings not adding up
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 11:05 am
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64685 posts
Posted on 8/14/15 at 11:04 am to
quote:

He's assuming all 9 were shot by officers.




Never said that. The one's I think that were shot by the cops are the one's who were shot from behind and above.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram