- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Those against gay marriage- you're dumb (long)
Posted on 6/14/15 at 9:32 pm to CMBears1259
Posted on 6/14/15 at 9:32 pm to CMBears1259
quote:Because the word for what they're doing is "marriage." We'll use the correct word for what they're doing, and we will be fine.
What's wrong with everyone having civil unions and saving marriage for the church then?
quote:The customers of the Stonewall Inn didn't beat themselves to death.
You and those of your persuasion are definitely the ones making a big deal.
0
Posted on 6/14/15 at 9:42 pm to ballscaster
quote:
Whether or not something should be banned is exactly the issue.
You going to ban dogs from being feline?
They simply cannot be unless you change a definition or two.
Some want to say they are parents to the pets they love. You want to ban that? Could just change the meaning of parent. In fact, unless you do change the meaning they cannot be parents to their pets, even if they are not banned.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 9:53 pm to novabill
You are the ones attempting to change a definition.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 9:57 pm to ballscaster
So you agree the Webster recently changed a long accepted definition? I was unaware those publishers shared your political view.
The meaning of marrige recently changed. Prior to the change you would have opposed?
LoL
The meaning of marrige recently changed. Prior to the change you would have opposed?
LoL
Posted on 6/15/15 at 6:12 am to novabill
quote:How many times must I tell you? "Changing the definition of marriage" has never been my concern. That's your talking point, not mine. I don't know when or why Webster changed its definition; all I know is what the definition is, which puts me in a perfect spot to correct all of you who accuse the "gay agenda" of currently pushing to change the definition. As we stand currently, it is an undeniable fact that those actively trying to change the definition of marriage are those who would have a marriage ban. You. Not me.
So you agree the Webster recently changed a long accepted definition? I was unaware those publishers shared your political view. The meaning of marrige recently changed. Prior to the change you would have opposed?
I have never favored nor opposed anything Merriam-Webster has ever published. I haven't made it a habit of crafting political opinions that involve me choosing the dictionary as my enemy. That's what crazy people do. Not me.
Posted on 6/15/15 at 8:49 am to ballscaster
Posted on 6/26/15 at 9:49 am to Tigerfan56
Hahahahahahahahahaha
Page 20 of 20
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News