- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The world's largest population about to get much larger
Posted on 10/29/15 at 6:57 am
Posted on 10/29/15 at 6:57 am
LINK
quote:
China will allow two children for every couple, China's state-run Xinhua news agency reported Thursday, a move that would effectively dismantle the remnants of the country's one-child policy that had been eased in recent years.
quote:
"To promote a balanced growth of population, China will continue to uphold the basic national policy of population control and improve its strategy on population development," Xinhua reported, citing a communique issued by the ruling Communist Party. "China will fully implement the policy of 'one couple, two children' in a proactive response to the issue of an aging population."
This post was edited on 10/29/15 at 11:30 am
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:01 am to ForeverLSU02
Need more troops for their future invasion of Russia, Middle East and Europe.
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:02 am to ForeverLSU02
And those women who had forced abortions are now going,
WTF?
WTF?
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:05 am to ForeverLSU02
The One Child policy has already done its job. For years, males were chosen over females, leading to a large population of marrying-age males with no women to marry (an expeditionary force). China is building their navy as fast as they can. They are also crippling us economically. Those 3 things will converge in time and it'll be game on.
Throughout history, when civilizations have a population of males who have no women to marry, they cause civil unrest. Because of this, they are used as an expeditionary force to go conquer lands elsewhere and take their women from that place.
Book it.
Throughout history, when civilizations have a population of males who have no women to marry, they cause civil unrest. Because of this, they are used as an expeditionary force to go conquer lands elsewhere and take their women from that place.
Book it.
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:18 am to ForeverLSU02
Once again, I'm amused at how many people comment on a story without actually clicking the link to read it first.
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:19 am to ForeverLSU02
Well duh!
Gotta boost the population for the coming war.
Gotta boost the population for the coming war.
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:21 am to kilo1234
quote:
Throughout history, when civilizations have a population of males who have no women to marry, they cause civil unrest. Because of this, they are used as an expeditionary force to go conquer lands elsewhere and take their women from that place.
Book it.
100% accurate.
It also works to thin out the poor and undesirables in society.
It's a rather good plan actually.
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:32 am to fr33manator
Last I checked we have a rather sizable nuclear submarine force which would blow any Chinese invasion out of the water even if they got the carriers.
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:33 am to kilo1234
quote:
hroughout history, when civilizations have a population of males who have no women to marry, they cause civil unrest.
The one difference between china and previous populations like that: flesh lights and sex dolls/robots. Chinese men are apparently content with those things, especially with sex robots on the horizon. They'd much rather stay in and screw their sex toys than go cause civil unrest
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:38 am to Upperdecker
Go get killed or bang my hot robot...
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:04 am to kilo1234
quote:
The One Child policy has already done its job. For years, males were chosen over females, leading to a large population of marrying-age males with no women to marry (an expeditionary force). China is building their navy as fast as they can. They are also crippling us economically. Those 3 things will converge in time and it'll be game on.
Throughout history, when civilizations have a population of males who have no women to marry, they cause civil unrest. Because of this, they are used as an expeditionary force to go conquer lands elsewhere and take their women from that place.
Book it.
You're an idiot.
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:13 am to OMLandshark
With all of the extra mouths to feed, what about the bug population? Don't they eat worms and crickets? PETB is gonna have a fit!
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:17 am to Titus Pullo
China won't invade Russia. They will be allies like they have been
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:34 am to geauxtigers87
quote:
Last I checked we have a rather sizable nuclear submarine force which would blow any Chinese invasion out of the water even if they got the carriers.
Don't be a dipshit. I never said anything about an invasion of the United States. It's a fact that the Chinese have a large population of military-age males and not enough females in the same age bracket to sustain things.
It's also a fact that when similar conditions have appeared throughout history, that population segment has been used as an expeditionary force. This doesn't mean an "invasion force". It simply means a group of people who can be projected throughout the globe.
Where the United States comes into play is that we are (or were until recently) the world's only super-power. We would be the ones to pump their brakes of they got froggy. Hence the need to cripple us economically and weaken us over time. Not so they can invade the United States, but so we can't (or won't) stand in their way when they are running amok around the globe (again, not necessarily "invading"...but projecting).
It's also a fact that the Chinese can't project very far outside their homeland because they don't have the Navy to do it. It's also a fact that they are spending a shitload of money to build a navy.
The world's population is huge and increasing. Natural resources are at a premium. Why do you think the Chinese are all over Africa and Afghanistan? It's the precious metals/minerals/etc that they are after. Eventually, those things will have to be secured via manpower and force if necessary. The perfect utilization of their massive population segment consisting of fighting-age males with jack shite to do at home.
And just because a bunch of pussies on here would rather stay home and do nothing as long as they have a robot to frick doesn't mean that others out there wouldn't jump at the chance to "go to X and secure your future there (with the backing of the Chinese gov't/military)".
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:35 am to OMLandshark
quote:
OMLandshark
You are a simple-minded jackass who doesn't know your arse from a hole in the ground. Go eat a dick. The grownups are talking.
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:44 am to kilo1234
You sure are worked up baw
This post was edited on 10/29/15 at 8:45 am
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:46 am to ForeverLSU02
Yeah, Wal Marts and Harbor Freight just made large orders so they have to keep up with the demand...
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:55 am to ForeverLSU02
1. Your link is broken
2. From another article.
2. From another article.
quote:
"It’s unclear what effect the shift will have on families. Some demographers and economists say that a new two-child policy will do too little to change China’s economic course and comes too late to solve the looming labor shortage. People are marrying later, some not at all, and many are choosing to have fewer or no children because of the financial burden, the Wall Street Journal adds.
Rural residents have been especially reluctant to have more than one child largely because of the costs associated with maintaining a larger family."
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News