Started By
Message

The world's largest population about to get much larger

Posted on 10/29/15 at 6:57 am
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52147 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 6:57 am
LINK
quote:

China will allow two children for every couple, China's state-run Xinhua news agency reported Thursday, a move that would effectively dismantle the remnants of the country's one-child policy that had been eased in recent years.
quote:

"To promote a balanced growth of population, China will continue to uphold the basic national policy of population control and improve its strategy on population development," Xinhua reported, citing a communique issued by the ruling Communist Party. "China will fully implement the policy of 'one couple, two children' in a proactive response to the issue of an aging population."
This post was edited on 10/29/15 at 11:30 am
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26125 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:01 am to
Posted by Titus Pullo
MTDGA
Member since Feb 2011
28567 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:01 am to
Need more troops for their future invasion of Russia, Middle East and Europe.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67866 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:02 am to
And those women who had forced abortions are now going,

WTF?
Posted by kilo1234
Member since May 2014
1431 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:05 am to
The One Child policy has already done its job. For years, males were chosen over females, leading to a large population of marrying-age males with no women to marry (an expeditionary force). China is building their navy as fast as they can. They are also crippling us economically. Those 3 things will converge in time and it'll be game on.

Throughout history, when civilizations have a population of males who have no women to marry, they cause civil unrest. Because of this, they are used as an expeditionary force to go conquer lands elsewhere and take their women from that place.

Book it.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:18 am to
Once again, I'm amused at how many people comment on a story without actually clicking the link to read it first.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:18 am to
Good for them.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124145 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:19 am to
Well duh!


Gotta boost the population for the coming war.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124145 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:21 am to
quote:

Throughout history, when civilizations have a population of males who have no women to marry, they cause civil unrest. Because of this, they are used as an expeditionary force to go conquer lands elsewhere and take their women from that place.

Book it.



100% accurate.

It also works to thin out the poor and undesirables in society.


It's a rather good plan actually.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25196 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:32 am to
Last I checked we have a rather sizable nuclear submarine force which would blow any Chinese invasion out of the water even if they got the carriers.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30566 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:33 am to
quote:

hroughout history, when civilizations have a population of males who have no women to marry, they cause civil unrest.

The one difference between china and previous populations like that: flesh lights and sex dolls/robots. Chinese men are apparently content with those things, especially with sex robots on the horizon. They'd much rather stay in and screw their sex toys than go cause civil unrest
Posted by bayourougebengal
Member since Mar 2008
7193 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 7:38 am to
Go get killed or bang my hot robot...

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108256 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:04 am to
quote:

The One Child policy has already done its job. For years, males were chosen over females, leading to a large population of marrying-age males with no women to marry (an expeditionary force). China is building their navy as fast as they can. They are also crippling us economically. Those 3 things will converge in time and it'll be game on.

Throughout history, when civilizations have a population of males who have no women to marry, they cause civil unrest. Because of this, they are used as an expeditionary force to go conquer lands elsewhere and take their women from that place.

Book it.


You're an idiot.
Posted by randybobandy
NOLA
Member since Mar 2015
1908 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:13 am to
With all of the extra mouths to feed, what about the bug population? Don't they eat worms and crickets? PETB is gonna have a fit!
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
68456 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:17 am to
China won't invade Russia. They will be allies like they have been
Posted by kilo1234
Member since May 2014
1431 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Last I checked we have a rather sizable nuclear submarine force which would blow any Chinese invasion out of the water even if they got the carriers.


Don't be a dipshit. I never said anything about an invasion of the United States. It's a fact that the Chinese have a large population of military-age males and not enough females in the same age bracket to sustain things.

It's also a fact that when similar conditions have appeared throughout history, that population segment has been used as an expeditionary force. This doesn't mean an "invasion force". It simply means a group of people who can be projected throughout the globe.

Where the United States comes into play is that we are (or were until recently) the world's only super-power. We would be the ones to pump their brakes of they got froggy. Hence the need to cripple us economically and weaken us over time. Not so they can invade the United States, but so we can't (or won't) stand in their way when they are running amok around the globe (again, not necessarily "invading"...but projecting).

It's also a fact that the Chinese can't project very far outside their homeland because they don't have the Navy to do it. It's also a fact that they are spending a shitload of money to build a navy.

The world's population is huge and increasing. Natural resources are at a premium. Why do you think the Chinese are all over Africa and Afghanistan? It's the precious metals/minerals/etc that they are after. Eventually, those things will have to be secured via manpower and force if necessary. The perfect utilization of their massive population segment consisting of fighting-age males with jack shite to do at home.

And just because a bunch of pussies on here would rather stay home and do nothing as long as they have a robot to frick doesn't mean that others out there wouldn't jump at the chance to "go to X and secure your future there (with the backing of the Chinese gov't/military)".
Posted by kilo1234
Member since May 2014
1431 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:35 am to
quote:

OMLandshark


You are a simple-minded jackass who doesn't know your arse from a hole in the ground. Go eat a dick. The grownups are talking.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25196 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:44 am to
You sure are worked up baw
This post was edited on 10/29/15 at 8:45 am
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26536 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:46 am to
Yeah, Wal Marts and Harbor Freight just made large orders so they have to keep up with the demand...
Posted by Alatgr
Mobeezy, Alabizzle
Member since Sep 2005
17660 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 8:55 am to
1. Your link is broken

2. From another article.

quote:

"It’s unclear what effect the shift will have on families. Some demographers and economists say that a new two-child policy will do too little to change China’s economic course and comes too late to solve the looming labor shortage. People are marrying later, some not at all, and many are choosing to have fewer or no children because of the financial burden, the Wall Street Journal adds.

Rural residents have been especially reluctant to have more than one child largely because of the costs associated with maintaining a larger family."
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram