Started By
Message

Terrorist watch list and being able to purchase a firearm

Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:09 pm
Posted by Boston911
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2013
1941 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:09 pm
What's the OT's thoughts on prohibiting those on terrorist watch list from being able to purchase a firearm.

I
Posted by lsutiger2010
Member since Aug 2008
14790 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:10 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 8:39 am
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33877 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:10 pm to
Gtfo
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141896 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:10 pm to
Posted by papasmurf1269
Hells Pass
Member since Apr 2005
20894 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:11 pm to
No brainer
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58123 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to
Just depends on who gets to make decisions on who is added to terrorist watch list. And who gets to decide the definition of a terrorist. And , oh never mind. I don't trust the government much to regulate such things.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141896 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

No brainer
then the OT is the place for it
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113945 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to
You are probably just flaming the board, but I would be surprised if a lot of people would be for allowing someone on a terrorist watch list to have the right to buy weapons.
Posted by Tingle
1173 Tallow Tree Lane
Member since Sep 2013
4558 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to
Why would this even be a question?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89516 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

No brainer


In more ways than one.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89516 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Why would this even be a question?


Because you have to be educated on the issue to discuss it a meaningful way. I'm sympathetic to this call to action, but I also recognize there are roughly 300k folks on this list. There is no due process to put them on there, it's a simple administrative act. There is no due process, no notice given to the individual, no opportunity for rebuttal and, more importantly, no administrative procedure to remove oneself and there are 10s of thousands of folks on there erroneously.

While I'm obviously not for terror suspects buying guns, I'm also not so cavalier as to discard the rights of others, particularly when we have seen the abuse of political opponents by the party in power, particularly with executive agencies.

So, there is all of that, just as food for thought.

This post was edited on 6/14/16 at 8:17 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69289 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:16 pm to
The 14th amendment makes clear that it is unconstitutional to deprive someone of constitutional rights without due process. Considering the FBI DOES NOT need to deal with due process to get people on the lists, such a gun restriction is unconstitutional under the 14th amendment.
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37134 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:19 pm to
Do you trust politicians? There is your answer.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124145 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:20 pm to
First you'd need some stringent rules on how one would get on this list, and then have it doubly ensured to be non-partisan and protected from meddling by politicians.

Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:21 pm to
The biggest problem here is due process. If the FBI suspects you of being, say, a member of a group that someone says is interested in perhaps one day of overthrowing the government, then congratulations you are on a watch list! No trial by jury or anything like that.

This is a very easy way of circumventing the Second Amendment for those who are inclined to do so.
Posted by Shepherd88
Member since Dec 2013
4582 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:21 pm to
So how do you end up on the list? Bc you made a simple post on Facebook saying you disagree with Obamacare, how do you get off the list? You're leaving the decision up to big brother, that's the reason we don't like it.

Also to add, Hillary Clinton is on the FBI's list and that bitch is running for president.. Tell me how that happens?
Posted by BACONisMEATcandy
Member since Dec 2007
46643 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:22 pm to
Ace midnight hit the nail on the head. Being put on this list is not an indicator of guilt, it's only suspicion by the government. If the person has a conviction against them that could preclude them I'm all for it.

Do you want to take away constitutionally protect rights without due process? As long as they are a US citizen it should take more than just suspicion.
This post was edited on 6/14/16 at 8:25 pm
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
65876 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:24 pm to
wanna ban guns?

put everyone's name on the terrorist list.

no more second amendment
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84856 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

The 14th amendment makes clear that it is unconstitutional to deprive someone of constitutional rights without due process. Considering the FBI DOES NOT need to deal with due process to get people on the lists, such a gun restriction is unconstitutional under the 14th amendment.


I get ALL of this, and I'm sympathetic to the fear of people being denied the right to purchase a firearm who are on there erroneously.

However, the other side is going to say that denying those rights to someone erroneously here or there is peanuts if the alternative is that a person on the list for good reason can walk in and buy whatever weapon they'd like, and I'm not sure they're wrong.
Posted by hawkster
Member since Aug 2010
6229 posts
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:25 pm to
Forget the arbitrary nature of the list itself for just a moment.

If a person is truly so likely to be a terrorist that he should not be allowed to purchase a firearm, then he should be arrested because there are thousands of other ways, other than a retail gun purchase, to access weapons that could kill innocent people.

Of course, with a democrat administration, the watch list is meaningless and dangerous.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram