- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Terrorist watch list and being able to purchase a firearm
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:09 pm
What's the OT's thoughts on prohibiting those on terrorist watch list from being able to purchase a firearm.
I
I
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:10 pm to Boston911
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 8:39 am
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to Boston911
Just depends on who gets to make decisions on who is added to terrorist watch list. And who gets to decide the definition of a terrorist. And , oh never mind. I don't trust the government much to regulate such things.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to papasmurf1269
quote:then the OT is the place for it
No brainer
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to Boston911
You are probably just flaming the board, but I would be surprised if a lot of people would be for allowing someone on a terrorist watch list to have the right to buy weapons.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to Boston911
Why would this even be a question?
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:12 pm to papasmurf1269
quote:
No brainer
In more ways than one.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:16 pm to Tingle
quote:
Why would this even be a question?
Because you have to be educated on the issue to discuss it a meaningful way. I'm sympathetic to this call to action, but I also recognize there are roughly 300k folks on this list. There is no due process to put them on there, it's a simple administrative act. There is no due process, no notice given to the individual, no opportunity for rebuttal and, more importantly, no administrative procedure to remove oneself and there are 10s of thousands of folks on there erroneously.
While I'm obviously not for terror suspects buying guns, I'm also not so cavalier as to discard the rights of others, particularly when we have seen the abuse of political opponents by the party in power, particularly with executive agencies.
So, there is all of that, just as food for thought.
This post was edited on 6/14/16 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:16 pm to Boston911
The 14th amendment makes clear that it is unconstitutional to deprive someone of constitutional rights without due process. Considering the FBI DOES NOT need to deal with due process to get people on the lists, such a gun restriction is unconstitutional under the 14th amendment.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:19 pm to Boston911
Do you trust politicians? There is your answer.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:20 pm to Boston911
First you'd need some stringent rules on how one would get on this list, and then have it doubly ensured to be non-partisan and protected from meddling by politicians.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:21 pm to Boston911
The biggest problem here is due process. If the FBI suspects you of being, say, a member of a group that someone says is interested in perhaps one day of overthrowing the government, then congratulations you are on a watch list! No trial by jury or anything like that.
This is a very easy way of circumventing the Second Amendment for those who are inclined to do so.
This is a very easy way of circumventing the Second Amendment for those who are inclined to do so.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:21 pm to Boston911
So how do you end up on the list? Bc you made a simple post on Facebook saying you disagree with Obamacare, how do you get off the list? You're leaving the decision up to big brother, that's the reason we don't like it.
Also to add, Hillary Clinton is on the FBI's list and that bitch is running for president.. Tell me how that happens?
Also to add, Hillary Clinton is on the FBI's list and that bitch is running for president.. Tell me how that happens?
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:22 pm to Ace Midnight
Ace midnight hit the nail on the head. Being put on this list is not an indicator of guilt, it's only suspicion by the government. If the person has a conviction against them that could preclude them I'm all for it.
Do you want to take away constitutionally protect rights without due process? As long as they are a US citizen it should take more than just suspicion.
Do you want to take away constitutionally protect rights without due process? As long as they are a US citizen it should take more than just suspicion.
This post was edited on 6/14/16 at 8:25 pm
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:24 pm to Boston911
wanna ban guns?
put everyone's name on the terrorist list.
no more second amendment
put everyone's name on the terrorist list.
no more second amendment
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:24 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
The 14th amendment makes clear that it is unconstitutional to deprive someone of constitutional rights without due process. Considering the FBI DOES NOT need to deal with due process to get people on the lists, such a gun restriction is unconstitutional under the 14th amendment.
I get ALL of this, and I'm sympathetic to the fear of people being denied the right to purchase a firearm who are on there erroneously.
However, the other side is going to say that denying those rights to someone erroneously here or there is peanuts if the alternative is that a person on the list for good reason can walk in and buy whatever weapon they'd like, and I'm not sure they're wrong.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:25 pm to Boston911
Forget the arbitrary nature of the list itself for just a moment.
If a person is truly so likely to be a terrorist that he should not be allowed to purchase a firearm, then he should be arrested because there are thousands of other ways, other than a retail gun purchase, to access weapons that could kill innocent people.
Of course, with a democrat administration, the watch list is meaningless and dangerous.
If a person is truly so likely to be a terrorist that he should not be allowed to purchase a firearm, then he should be arrested because there are thousands of other ways, other than a retail gun purchase, to access weapons that could kill innocent people.
Of course, with a democrat administration, the watch list is meaningless and dangerous.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News