Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Stack ranking performance review blows up in Marissa Mayer's face at Yahoo

Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:39 pm
Posted by Street Hawk
Member since Nov 2014
3460 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:39 pm
quote:

Around the time proponents of stack ranking like Microsoft and GE were ditching the system in favor of more employee-friendly management strategies, newly appointed Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer embraced the strategy with the unveiling of her quarterly performance-review (QPR) system.

Shortly after joining the company in 2012, she implemented the employee-performance-review process, which had managers score their employees and distribute them into "greatly exceeds," "exceeds," "achieves," "occasionally misses," and "misses" categories, with a target percentage of employees to be distributed into each.

Now, as Mayer comes under fire from investors over Yahoo's management and insufficient turnaround, Yahoo also has a lawsuit to contend with surrounding its controversial QPR system.

In the lawsuit filed on Monday, former Yahoo editor Gregory Anderson accuses Yahoo of implementing its performance-review system knowing that stack ranking had been criticized and rejected by larger employers because it was "subject to abuse, often resulted in claims of discrimination, and needed to be closely monitored in application and effect."

He says the rules implementing the QPR process were vaguely drawn, were communicated on a need-to-know basis, differed from department to department, and would change quarterly to achieve headcount-reduction targets.

Anderson further alleges that even if all employees on a team were performing well or at the same level, managers were required to place some of them in "occasionally misses" and "misses" buckets, resulting in good employees being let go.

LINK

She should have never left Google. Can't decide which one is worse - Mayer's last three years at Yahoo! or Léo Apotheker tenure at HP.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103060 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:43 pm to
She is a joke.
Posted by kilo1234
Member since May 2014
1431 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:44 pm to
Running a company into the ground apparently makes you a candidate for President of the United States. Sounds like Mayer's on the right track.
Posted by Artie Rome
Hwy 1
Member since Jul 2014
8757 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:44 pm to
I don't know what any of that means.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:46 pm to
quote:


She should have never left Google.


It is widely speculated that Mayer was fizzling out at Google when Yahoo picked her up.

Posted by NoHoTiger
So many to kill, so little time
Member since Nov 2006
45736 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

I don't know what any of that means.

It means that employee performance reviews weren't actually a review of the employees' performance, but rather a way to subjectively identify who got shite-canned.
Posted by SanFranTiger
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2003
4896 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:49 pm to
I have to say, as an employee of GE, I would much prefer the old performance quadrant/stacked rank process. Now there are no ratings at all, and your performance review is a "conversation" with your manager.

It doesn't feel very satisfying at all.
Posted by euphemus
Member since Mar 2014
536 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:56 pm to
You work for GE in SF? If so, what business unit may I ask?
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79083 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 3:59 pm to
Yet she is worth $400M

Yahoo! was/is in a no-win sicheeation.
Posted by SanFranTiger
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2003
4896 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

You work for GE in SF? If so, what business unit may I ask?


in San Ramon, GE Digital. Formerly known as GE Software.
we build this LINK
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 4:08 pm to
My company evaluates employees using a similar system. Seems to work fine.
Posted by euphemus
Member since Mar 2014
536 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 4:14 pm to


I'd like to connect with you about possible job openings at GE. Can you email me?
This post was edited on 2/4/16 at 4:37 pm
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 4:19 pm to
At my previous employer I hated the quarterly review. Basically every quarter we had to evaluate ourselves 1-5 in several categories, and then sit down with our boss who also ranked us, and compare/defend our rankings. Based on the rankings, a formula was used for every annual to come up with whether you deserved a raise, and if so, how much.

Morale was low at the job and a lot of people just stopped filling out their reviews and accepted whatever our bosses told us. A lot of supervisors would pull the old "Nobody deserves a 5 because nobody's perfect, there's always something you could improve on, etc."
Posted by SanFranTiger
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2003
4896 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Can you email me - euphemus@outlook.com


Done. Check yo mail
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 4:25 pm to
Quarterly reviews are ridiculous.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

I have to say, as an employee of GE, I would much prefer the old performance quadrant/stacked rank process. Now there are no ratings at all, and your performance review is a "conversation" with your manager.

It doesn't feel very satisfying at all.





My boss/most of the department does quarterly "conversations" and yearly eval ratings. If you are surprised by your rating it is your own fault
Posted by SanFranTiger
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2003
4896 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

My boss/most of the department does quarterly "conversations" and yearly eval ratings. If you are surprised by your rating it is your own fault


Correct. My point is that we don't even have ratings anymore.

With the quarterly conversations and yearly ratings, it felt much more rewarding and satisfying.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
22729 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

"Nobody deserves a 5 because nobody's perfect, there's always something you could improve on, etc."


That's the worst. Then why have a 5 on the damn review? I've had reviews where I'd hit and exceeded every goal, and still had some categories listed as "meets expectations." When I asked about it, the reply was "oh, I can't turn in a perfect review, they'd question it..." Well, let them question it then.
This post was edited on 2/4/16 at 4:53 pm
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
8966 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

She is a joke.


So how many hundred million are in her golden parachute for doing a crapay job? 'merica.
This post was edited on 2/4/16 at 7:23 pm
Posted by motionmagic
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Nov 2010
831 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 6:59 pm to
IWHI

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram