- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remind me again, why the sale of automatic weapons are allowed?
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:39 am to stout
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:39 am to stout
quote:
Or rammed the crowd with a car
The guy in Nice, France killed and injured more people with a box truck.
quote:
Someone sick enough will find a way.
And that's the most logical view point of this entire thread.
0
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:40 am to tigerinthebueche
quote:
About 10,000 people will die in car accidents. Better ban those Toyota’s.
To compare a car accident with purposely pulling a gun trigger with intent to kill as many innocent people is dumb.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:41 am to Taxing Authority
FWIW, there are belt fed uppers that mount to an AR reciever...
I agree it's not likely that was used, but they exist
I agree it's not likely that was used, but they exist
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 9:41 am
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:00 am to CorkSoaker
quote:
To compare a car accident with purposely pulling a gun trigger with intent to kill as many innocent people is dumb.
As opposed to purposely ramming a truck into a crowd of people?
Or setting off a bomb next to a building?
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:01 am to TheMailman
quote:
TheMailman
What's truly remarkable is that someone of your intelligence level is allowed to vote.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:03 am to TheMailman
It wasn't an automatic weapon. Pretty sure he was using something like this: GAT Crank
If you listen to the firing it wasn't the rhythm of an automatic, the speed of the shots was going up and down.
If you listen to the firing it wasn't the rhythm of an automatic, the speed of the shots was going up and down.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:06 am to CP3
The gun he used was belt fed. It's in an article of what police found in hotel room.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:06 am to stout
quote:
Do people realize how inaccurate a fully auto weapon is on full blast? That wouldn't make sense to use at the distance he was shooting at.
No. I've come to learn everyone just goes by what they see on TV. Half the people I've taken shooting with me (because they were possible interested in owning a gun) will attempt to "shoot from the hip" with a damn pistol. There's a reason you never give someone who's not shot firearms a loaded gun.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:07 am to LCA131
The belt fed AR 15 was an example. Police found a belt fed weapon when searching the hotel room of the shooter. Thanks.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:08 am to CorkSoaker
quote:
To compare a car accident with purposely pulling a gun trigger with intent to kill as many innocent people is dumb.
By god, you're right. As soon as we declare America a gun free zone, no more shooting deaths will happen!
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:08 am to tigerinthebueche
Ok, Tiger, since you are so completely informed of all the facts, why not explain, so none of us will be misinformed. Thanks.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:10 am to terd ferguson
Why don't you do a look up on Belt fed AR-15, that's how I found it. Stop being an arse.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:14 am to Isabelle81
quote:
The gun he used was belt fed. It's in an article of what police found in hotel room.
Link? Or do we just have to take your word for it?
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:19 am to TheMailman
10/10 troll. You know your audience
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:19 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:19 am to Isabelle81
quote:
Problem is, they didn't know anything about automatic weapons
Caetano v. Massachusetts
quote:
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the conviction, holding that a stun gun “is not the type of weapon that is eligible for Second Amendment protection” because it was “not in common use at the time of [the Second Amendment’s] enactment.” 470 Mass., at 781, 26 N. E. 3d, at 693.
This reasoning defies our decision in Heller, which
rejected as “bordering on the frivolous” the argument “that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.” 554 U. S., at 582.
quote:
And, we have this group called, the NRA, whose main focus is to assure that anyone can own any gun type they want.
This is just as uneducated as the rest of you post. Typical.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:24 am to Isabelle81
quote:
in an article of what police found in hotel room.
Maybe I'm just naturally skeptical, but I find it hard to believe that the police have already emptied the room, cataloged everything, issued a report, and someone has published an article telling what gun he used. Maybe you have some incredible sources Isabelle.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:26 am to LCA131
STFU LCA. Why don't you just "look it up"!!
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:27 am to TheMailman
quote:
TheMailman
These OPs never appear in these stupid threads after their orignial flame post.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:29 am to Festus
Sorry. My bad for thinking logically you ugly ape.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News