- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Planning starts on Washington St exit relocation
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:29 am
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:29 am
LINK
#itshappenning
quote:
While state officials await word on whether Louisiana will receive some or all of the $100 million in federal FASTLANE transportation funds it requested earlier this spring, planning is already underway to relocate the Washington Street exit on Interstate-10—one of the sources of chronic congestion along I-10 East.
Planning for the project is being fast-tracked by the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, while longer-term megaprojects—like widening I-10 from the Mississippi River bridge to the I-10/I-12 split—slowly make their way through the multistaged federal planning process.
There’s still no word on where exactly the new exit will be located. Preliminary designs have suggested it could tie in at Terrace Street, but Deputy Transportation Secretary Eric Kalivoda says it’s too soon to say for sure.
#itshappenning
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:31 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
relocate the Washington Street exit
Just eliminate it. Who the hell gets off on Washington Street anyway?
quote:
one of the sources of chronic congestion
ISWYD
This post was edited on 5/26/16 at 10:34 am
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:31 am to Jim Rockford
We won't see it completed till 2025. Fact
This post was edited on 5/26/16 at 10:32 am
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:32 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
while longer-term megaprojects—like widening I-10 from the Mississippi River bridge to the I-10/I-12 split—slowly make their way through the multistaged federal planning process
this should be the priority
quote:
relocate the Washington Street exit on Interstate-10
ok fine...close the present exit and proceed with the plans above. Then worry about this meaningless exit
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:34 am to Shexter
quote:
Who the hell gets off on Washington Street anyway?
it's become one of those symbols of the "NBR v. white people" debate in BR
i think it's more symbolic than anything else, but it is what it is
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:35 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
Planning starts on Washington St exit relocation
I rejoice for my great grandchildren.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:35 am to Jim Rockford
This exit has been held hostage for years by certain politicians as a tool to get benefits for their constituents (and votes) plus outright payoffs. All while tens of millions of people have sat in traffic and countless hundreds injured in traffic related collisions. Fact.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:50 am to Jim Rockford
The only people who use the washington street exit are the women drivers who are too busy texting to merge left.
Eliminate the wahington st. exit and re-stripe that secton of interstate. Have the lanes coming off the bridge continue on, while the far left lane of southbound I-110 ends just before the merge.
Eliminate the wahington st. exit and re-stripe that secton of interstate. Have the lanes coming off the bridge continue on, while the far left lane of southbound I-110 ends just before the merge.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:54 am to Jim Rockford
quote:key word
Planning
Planning =/= doing
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:56 am to SlowFlowPro
its the worst, always has morons trying to cut across 4 lanes to get off there. Of course they stare you down like you're the a-hole.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:58 am to Jim Rockford
Just get off at Nicholson and get back on I10 at the Washington St exit. It's like the traffic was never there.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 11:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it's become one of those symbols of the "NBR v. white people" debate in BR
Given the amount of congestion on a major interstate, I consider it to be NBR vs the US of A.
If truly WANTED, that exit could be shut down over a weekend. Concrete bollards placed at the exit, some restriping on I-10 and I-110. Done deal.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 11:18 am to Jim Rockford
They're trying to fight a forest fire with a garden hose. Nothing is going to make any noticeable impact except for a bypass or loop. I refuse to move back to BR until that is complete.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 11:28 am to Jim Rockford
Plan plan plan plan plan plan plan plan....frick planning.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 11:35 am to Shexter
quote:
Just eliminate it. Who the hell gets off on Washington Street anyway?
I use it to bail (heading from downtown) when the interstate is backed up.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 11:36 am to Jim Rockford
Can't wait to take my now 3 year old to see the start of construction when she turns 18, and then my grand kids 10 years later can see the completion.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 11:50 am to seawolf06
quote:
They're trying to fight a forest fire with a garden hose. Nothing is going to make any noticeable impact except for a bypass or loop.
Pretty much. The effect of removing the Washington St. exit will be minimal. The problem is an increase in the number of people on I-10 and an infrastructure that is not built to handle it.
There are major choke points before the 10/12 merge that really have nothing to do with Wash. St.
1. You have more 18 wheelers on 10 than ever before. If eastbound traffic ahead of the bridge slows even for just a few minutes, it creates a reverberating effect back to WBR. Once you slow them down, those 18 wheelers take forever to climb up the bridge. That slows everything behind them down.
2. removing wash st. exit just pushes the problem down to Dalrymple.
3. The aforementioned 18 wheelers then slow everything down again as they are trying to climb the Perkins Rd. overpass.
BR traffic is never going to get better until they find a way to give the cross-country travelers and 18 wheelers an option to go around 10 as it passes through the heart of BR. Sadly, this state is so politically corrupt and inefficient that there will continue to be an all out war to prevent that from happening, beit the NIMBY's or businesses off of Perkins, Acadian, Bluebonnet, Essen, Seigen.
Plus, unless you are the most naive person in the world, the black residents of "the bottom" neighborhood are going to raise holy hell if anyone tries to remove the Washington St. exit. It has nothing to do with logic. They are going to cry racism (at least until the political leaders and community organizers have their pockets greased by the state and fedgov.)
Posted on 5/26/16 at 12:04 pm to Alt26
I agree that a bypass is needed.
The old bridge is largely under utilized. If Airline Highway moved traffic with ANY efficiency, more traffic would go that direction and then down LA1 or 415.
How do you get Airline moving? Eliminate some traffic lights, widen the street, widen the median, and eliminate some unnecessary cub cuts. Maybe an overpass over the two rail road crossings.
This northern route in the capture doesn't move well enough to be an alternative route. The right of way is there. It may not need to be a freeway the entire route, but it has to be improved significantly over what is there now. The speeds are too low, there are too many lights, and there are too many at-grade rail road crossings to be efficient.
The old bridge is largely under utilized. If Airline Highway moved traffic with ANY efficiency, more traffic would go that direction and then down LA1 or 415.
How do you get Airline moving? Eliminate some traffic lights, widen the street, widen the median, and eliminate some unnecessary cub cuts. Maybe an overpass over the two rail road crossings.
This northern route in the capture doesn't move well enough to be an alternative route. The right of way is there. It may not need to be a freeway the entire route, but it has to be improved significantly over what is there now. The speeds are too low, there are too many lights, and there are too many at-grade rail road crossings to be efficient.
This post was edited on 5/26/16 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 5/26/16 at 12:11 pm to DirtyMike
quote:
Just get off at Nicholson and get back on I10 at the Washington St exit. It's like the traffic was never there.
Looking at a Google map, there is only an exit from the interstate to Washington ST. There is no entrance ramp from Washington St.to east I-10. So, taking the bridge to Highland is a better way to Wash. ST. But I don't see getting back on the interstate there. I've never been that way to confirm.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 12:14 pm to member12
quote:
How do you get Airline moving?
Make it a Texas style highway with frontage roads along both sides.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News