- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New Olympic Competition Levels thoughts?
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:04 am
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:04 am
The Olympics should move from 2 levels of competition based on gender to 3 based on Testosterone levels. How would you feel about this:
1.) Open
2.) Men
3.) Less than an avg male level
It'd be really entertaining to have a freak level that has no testing, do what you want to win at all costs. Lol. Why not?
1.) Open
2.) Men
3.) Less than an avg male level
It'd be really entertaining to have a freak level that has no testing, do what you want to win at all costs. Lol. Why not?
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:11 am to OweO
Its about to be gone, and that is for the summer olympics. I'm talking a movement in world competition to just make a new level of competition that is super strict on being "clean" and then having an open division with no testing. I honestly could see some sports making this route.
What if there is a new "XFL" that has no drug testing?
What if there is a new "XFL" that has no drug testing?
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:12 am to baldona
quote:
It'd be really entertaining to have a freak level that has no testing, do what you want to win at all costs. Lol. Why not?
While morally and ethically wrong, this would be incredibly entertaining. Definitely something out of a sci-fi movie
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:24 am to baldona
Great idea. Several categories come to mind: 1) got poon, no pecker males 2) got pecker, no poon females 3) got both, males 4)got both females, etc. Each of these categories could have a PED division and a PED-free division.
The open division where anything goes would be wonderful entertainment.
The open division where anything goes would be wonderful entertainment.
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:44 am to Rockbrc
I'm actually pretty serious. I'm tired of screwing around with this juicing garbage and letting people back in after "appeals". In pro sports its one thing as its every year and you can sit out for half the season, but the Olympics is once every 4 years.
They need to get really really strict and stay that way. I'm not opposed at all to having 1 separate division for people that have failed. You get 0 strikes, you either pass stringent tests or you race in the "Open" division against juicers. I think it would really add a lot of entertainment. Maybe you can still disallow certain highly unhealthy drugs but allow the rest.
They need to get really really strict and stay that way. I'm not opposed at all to having 1 separate division for people that have failed. You get 0 strikes, you either pass stringent tests or you race in the "Open" division against juicers. I think it would really add a lot of entertainment. Maybe you can still disallow certain highly unhealthy drugs but allow the rest.
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:49 am to baldona
sure...
would the Open group actually be just the top 8 athletes in the event, or would we liberal it up like everything else, and mandate "at least one woman + at least two minorities + at least one transgender + no more than 4 white guys"
would the Open group actually be just the top 8 athletes in the event, or would we liberal it up like everything else, and mandate "at least one woman + at least two minorities + at least one transgender + no more than 4 white guys"
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:59 am to jmcwhrter
I think Open division would just have to be the top 8 or 10. No nod to political correctness, drug use or any other issue. Just the top dogs in each junkyard.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News