Started By
Message

New BMJ study confirmsCovid-19 vaccine reduces the risk of heart problems & blood clots.

Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:44 am
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40138 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:44 am
quote:

The COVID-19 vaccine can cut the risk of heart failure and blood clots after a COVID-19 infection, a new study in the British Medical Journal found. Previous studies found that a SARS-CoV-2 infection can trigger cardiac and thromboembolic complications, and the risk for a person infected remains high for a year after becoming sick, researchers noted.
The new study found that while the risks remain, getting a vaccine slashes the risk of heart failure up to 55 percent and blood clots up to 78 percent after getting sick.
Using a sample of 10.17 million vaccinated people and 10.39 million unvaccinated people across three European countries, the study found the positive health effects were most significant in the 30 days following a vaccination but can last up to a year.
The study examined people who were vaccinated with Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson.
After the COVID-19 vaccine became politicized and controversial despite medical professionals urging the public to receive the shot, doctors said this study shows complications from the infection itself are worse than complications that may come from receiving the vaccine.
“While there has been concern about the risk of myocarditis and other thromboembolic events following vaccination, this analysis highlights that the risk of such complications is notably higher when it comes from the SARS-CoV-2 infection itself,” Dr. John Brownstein, the chief innovation officer at Boston Children’s Hospital, told ABC News.
The results of the study show that a COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of cardiac and thromboembolic outcomes after a COVID infection. The effects were more pronounced in the few weeks following the infection, but are “consistent with known reductions in disease severity following breakthrough versus unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 infection,” the study found.
LINK

I know that some of the people here will not care about the results but for those who are actually doing their research on the subject and not just googling articles to support their own incorrect conclusions might care.

ETA: LINK to the actual study for those with access to the BMJ and want to read it.
This post was edited on 3/20/24 at 8:53 am
Posted by GeauxZone90
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2010
2923 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:47 am to
MSM and the paid off scientist. Nice try sheep
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166295 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:49 am to
Posted by El Segundo Guy
SE OK
Member since Aug 2014
9601 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:49 am to
No one's going to believe published medical journals anymore. They can print whatever they want, call it science and beg for more research dollars.

They've lost all credibility.
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31049 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:49 am to
Posted by SouthPlains
Member since Jul 2023
508 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:49 am to
quote:

not just googling articles to support their own incorrect conclusions


quote:

The Hill


So how’d you find this article, champ?
Posted by bayouvette
Raceland
Member since Oct 2005
4735 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:50 am to
So take the vaccine after you get covid?
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
30302 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:50 am to
Breaking news….cigarettes reduce the risk of lung cancer
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18286 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:51 am to
Nuh uh only anecdotes from PatriotPureBloods.substack.net are true. Studies are fake and gay and funded by big pharma who wants to sterilize conservatives
Posted by The Easter Bunny
Minnesota
Member since Jan 2005
45568 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:51 am to
quote:

I know that some of the people here will not care about the results but for those who are actually doing their research on the subject and not just googling articles to support their own incorrect conclusions might care.


I haven’t read the article, but what you posted is that the vaccine leads to better heart-related outcomes after having COVID. I think the issue to many has been: 1/I still get COVID, and 2/the heart-related issues of the vaccine that are unrelated to COVID
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40138 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:51 am to
quote:

No one's going to believe published medical journals anymore. They can print whatever they want, call it science and beg for more research dollars. They've lost all credibility.


Well damn. Instead of spending the better part of a decade sacrificing my time and social life. I could have just listened to Joe Rogan and read the OT.
Posted by El Segundo Guy
SE OK
Member since Aug 2014
9601 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:53 am to
So you care one but what a medical journal states?

I don't.

Those bastards had the audacity to state that face diapers stopped the spread of covid. And you fools bought it hook, line and sinker.
This post was edited on 3/20/24 at 8:56 am
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15554 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:53 am to
You’re a moron. The article clearly states “after getting sick”—yes, because the complications from the vaccine are immediate and without sickness
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79221 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:54 am to
As a proud and uncorrupted pureblood battling long covid who hasn't left my home in 18 months I don't know how to feel
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40138 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:54 am to
quote:

So how’d you find this article, champ?


Reading the AMA daily briefs during my morning dump. I then read the actual study in the BMJ. I posted the Hill story because BMJ is behind a firewall.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13429 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:54 am to
quote:

No one's going to believe published medical journals anymore. They can print whatever they want, call it science and beg for more research dollars.

They've lost all credibility.


Ehh most of the "scientific" stuff coming out during COVID didn't go through the traditional process of peer review > publish > etc. which takes years, sometimes decades, before the findings are accepted on a large scale. They rushed everything through during COVID.

But I think people are too stupid to separate the COVID years from the rest.0


Caveat: My comment is regarding the general view of medical journals, not COVID related work.

Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68266 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:56 am to
They won't want to hear or believe this. A loon on YouTube is far more reliable.
This post was edited on 3/20/24 at 8:58 am
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40138 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:57 am to
quote:

You’re a moron. The article clearly states “after getting sick”—yes, because the complications from the vaccine are immediate and without sickness


The virus has mutated enough that vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals both risk getting infections. If you do the math you will see that reductions in post infection complications is much greater than the risk of vaccine complications.
Posted by El Segundo Guy
SE OK
Member since Aug 2014
9601 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:

reductions in post infection complications




Long Covid. Oh boy.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40138 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Those bastards had the audacity to state that face diapers stopped the spread of covid. And you fools bought it hook, line and sinker.


If you go back and read my post history, you’ll see that I was always skeptical of the claims that non-N95 masks stopped or resulted transmission.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram