Started By
Message

re: Monday Night Raw Thread: Amore or Anarchy Edition

Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:08 pm to
Posted by 504Voodoo
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2012
13532 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

So this means we get Randall vs John for the 2 billionth time?


Why, just why?




Because we have a stupid part-time champ that they can't afford to pay for each appereance.
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
17995 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:08 pm to
Orton...



Cena...



45


LIVE ON THE WWE NETWORK FOR ONLY $9.99
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141077 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:08 pm to
so Cena vs. Orton inside HitC

&

Ambrose vs. Rollins inside HitC

that Ambrose match will be brutal
Posted by LSU-MNCBABY
Knightsgate
Member since Jan 2004
24347 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:08 pm to
Awful match, prolly a screwy ending to Rollins Ambrose and then cena v orton for the millionth time in the main event
Posted by oR33Do
Tuscaloosa
Member since Oct 2012
13561 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:10 pm to
I hope to see some thumbtacks
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141077 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:11 pm to
but guys... we get Rollins/Ambrose inside HitC

it's going to be both brutal and epic

and I'm going to miss it live
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
17995 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:14 pm to
So the champ will not wrestle at this PPV...

And we get Orton/Cena #1,274

= snooze fest


I'm fast giving up hope on WWE June - December
This post was edited on 10/13/14 at 10:15 pm
Posted by LSU-MNCBABY
Knightsgate
Member since Jan 2004
24347 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:25 pm to
Yeah it's pretty bad and have they given any (Kayfabe) reason why lesnar isn't defending?

Any mention of that "defend the title" clause they used to strip db like 6 months ago?

Whole thing is just lazy writing by creative, they want you to buy in, then do shite like this
Posted by lsu31always
Team 31™
Member since Jan 2008
107739 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:26 pm to
Believe the clause is written as unable to defend the title.
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
58196 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:42 pm to
There's no reason not to come up with a storyline reason for brock not defending. It's not like it would be hard
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 15Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram