Started By
Message

re: Japan vs Nazi Germany (hypothetical alternative history)

Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:39 pm to
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38221 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

The Tripitz was actually the same class as the Bismarck. In fact it was the second of the Bismarck class. Basically you could have paired both them together against the Yamato and both would be left smoking wrecks before they could fire a single salvo.


Except that the Yamato class had terrible fire control systems that probably could not track the Bismarck, yet alone the Tirpitz alongside. Yamato v. Bismarck + Tirpitz would end with Yamato being flanked and sank by both fast battleships.

If you throw in the Musashi, I still think the Bismarck and Tirpitz could rain hell on them from range. Where both Yamato classes couldn't deliver accurate fire.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:39 pm to
Why would anyone argue about obsolete battleships?
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38221 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

Tigah in the ATL


Slow night.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64427 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Except that the Yamato class had terrible fire control systems that probably could not track the Bismarck, yet alone the Tirpitz alongside. Yamato v. Bismarck + Tirpitz would end with Yamato being flanked and sank by both fast battleships. If you throw in the Musashi, I still think the Bismarck and Tirpitz could rain hell on them from range. Where both Yamato classes couldn't deliver accurate fire.


The shorter range if the German 15inch guns coupled with the Yamato's massive armor would have been the deciding factor. Even if the Germans landed a series of salvos, the Yamato could shake off the effects easily. But even one salvo from Yamato's 18 inch guns would have doomed the Germans.
Posted by willthezombie
the graveyard
Member since Dec 2013
1546 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

With Germany potentially having access to all of Europe and Africa/Russia and Japan having access to America (you did say complete axis victory)and China it would be the most costly war in human history and could potentially kill 70% of males on Earth.


In this scenario the Japs defeat the US at Battle of Midway and we sue for peace. The US becomes a puppet of Japan. Germany conquers britain and gets its empire except for the asian part.
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 10:57 pm
Posted by willthezombie
the graveyard
Member since Dec 2013
1546 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

Too far apart geographically for it to happen.


not if you look at their plan to divide the world. their empires would share one bigass border.
LINK
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64427 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

In this scenario the Japs defeat the US at Battle of Midway and we sue for peace. The US becomes a puppet of Japan.


Even had we lost at Midway and sued for peace, the best the Japs could have hoped for, and actually all they wanted, was a free hand the the Pacific, primarily in China, and the southwest portion of the Pacific. There never was any possibly of the US becoming a puppet of anyone.
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 10:59 pm
Posted by willthezombie
the graveyard
Member since Dec 2013
1546 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

There never was any possibly of the US becoming a puppet of anyone.


that is why this is a hypothetical situation
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

The Tripitz was actually the same class as the Bismarck. In fact it was the second of the Bismarck class. Basically you could have paired both them together against the Yamato and both would be left smoking wrecks before they could fire a single salvo.


Is it because the Yamato had bigger guns? Seriously, didn't the Bismark have like 16" and the Yamato 18"? Is that the difference? I defer to you, darth, you're my favorite war poster here with all that damn knowledge you have in your noggin.

I know both needed an absolute arse whipping from the air to go down but then again a frickin swordfish is what screwed the Bismark while the Yamato faced the wrath of hellcats and dauntless'

Thanks for shitting on my dream, darth. I wanted the Bismark to win with my favorite ship name ever, the Prinz Eugen, coming in with the assist

ETA: nvm, you answered most of that already
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 11:20 pm
Posted by HeavyCore
Member since Sep 2012
2552 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

Is it because the Yamato had bigger guns? Seriously, didn't the Bismark have like 16" and the Yamato 18"? Is that the difference?


The real big ship fight would have been between the Yamato and the Iowa (or maybe even the South Dakota for that matter). Just to throw my hat in real quick because I love naval warfare:

The Bismarck only had a 15".
The Iowa, however did have 16" with amazing shells that almost made up the difference in comparison with the Yamato's 18". The two, Iowa and Yamato's, artillery were very comparable to each other; spouting almost identical velocity and range. The advantage went to Yamato in pure payload weight by about 500 lbs. The Bismarck had only two real advantages; Accuracy and rate of fire. That said the Yamato and Iowa could fire from 40k-45k yards away, while the Bismarck could only fire from 38k and had a very low weight to it's projectiles by about half of the other two vessels.

In other words, the shell's could be said to have been vastly more important than the Battery itself.

....and that's just talking about their main armaments. Truly, if it was the Yamato vs. Bismarck in open water....the Yamato probably wins it fairly handily.

Side note: I used to go here all the time for info on ships LINK. It has a great deal of valuable info, and the guy who wrote it has a genuine love and unbiased nature towards the facts behind the ships.

Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 11:51 pm to
Good stuff, thanks
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 11:59 pm to
How the hell would any nation on earth Occupy the US? That shite would impossible.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65005 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:05 am to
quote:

Truly, if it was the Yamato vs. Bismarck in open water....the Yamato probably wins it fairly handily.


I disagree. The Yamato's fire control system was no where near as advanced as the Bismarck's. I'd also wager the Bismarck had the better officers and crew.

Let's not forget that the Bismarck's armor was pretty legendary. James Cameron's expedition to the Bismarck in 2001 proved that it was not British shells or torpedoes that sank her in the final battle, but the ship's own crew. It refused to sink despite being hit by an estimated 300-400 shells at close range.
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 12:06 am
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98156 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:07 am to
It never would have happened. Japan never aspired to world domination, and Germany did only hypothetically. Their interests didn't conflict with one another. Digesting what they had already conquered was enough to keep them busy for a couple of generations at least.
Posted by Hater Bait
Tuscaloosa & Gulf Shores
Member since Nov 2012
2870 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:37 am to
Germany would control most of the resources on earth.

Nazi ability to wage aggressive war would allow them to dominate Japan.
Posted by HeavyCore
Member since Sep 2012
2552 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:39 am to
In terms of fire control, you're really splitting hairs. Most would agree that both the Yamato and Bismarck had fairly even fire control with each being poor systems, however to bring the Iowa back up; The Iowa decimates both of them in this area.

Quoting Brooks Rowlett "Only with the advent of 10cm and (later) 3cm wavelength sets was true 'blindfire' radar fire-control achievable, wherein the firing ship need never come into visual range of the opposing vessel. The Germans, Japanese, and Italians never developed sets of this capability (both the Japanese (despite its 10cm wavelength) and German sets were usable for fire control against a battleship-sized target only out to a range of about 27,000 yards.)" Now in optical fire control, the Bismarck did have a fair advantage of about 5 meters difference over the Yamato; but to actually use these form of data input the ships would have had to be a hell of a lot closer than 25k yards which the Yamato would never let happen. So I consider it a moot point in terms of optics.

To go to the armor, its really no contest. The Yamato is simply a beast. Going back to Brooks "Bismarck, for instance, was designed for combat in the North Atlantic. Her designers anticipated weather and visibility conditions such as had prevailed at Jutland in WWI. As a result, she was optimized for short-range, flat-trajectory combats. Her armor scheme reflects this, with an armor layout that makes it fantastically difficult to put a shell into her vitals at short range, but which is vulnerable to long-range fire, and which reduces the total amount of protected volume in the vessel by carrying her armor deck lower in the ship than her contemporaries." So, to add, the British and French ships were never gonna blast through it, namely for the way the Biz was built. on the side though, the Allied Euro fleets had some of the worst armaments in the entire war. That could do nothing but help the Biz in this case. Add to that, the Yamato excelled in long distance combat.

"By the same token, Yamato was simply built to stand up to and utterly outclass any conceivable American or British opponent by sheer weight of gunfire, and elephant-like armor. As such, hers is a sort of 'brute force' approach to protection. Her armor layout isn't the most efficient, but she has a lot of armor, so it doesn't really matter."

That said, the Yamato had 16" steel plating to the Biz's 12". To further add injury, the Biz's 15" 47cal only had a projectile weight of 1800 lbs, which compared to the Yamato's 18.1"/45cal 3200 lbs, is rather infantile. That's just the shells, talking about the actual Battery's and you have a simlar 2:1 ratio of power in favor of the Yamato.

Now then, the Bismarck was faster and much more manuverable when firing (The Yamato had to be practically at a stand still to fire). So if it were to close the distance before being blown to shreds it could probably do some damage. However, even with that I don't think it'd be enough. I just don't see the Biz's artillery being able to dent the Yamato.

Talking about Navel expertise in terms of crew though, you have the Japanese who are all about the attack and almost no defense (in terms of tactics) vs the German's who are more deceptive in their approach to a fight.

Either way, it's be a fun matchup.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64427 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 10:24 am to
OK, I said I was going to post my thoughts on a war between Germany & Japan so here goes...

First, let's set the stage, (I'm going to go with the most realistic version here) Germany has forced Britain to sue for peace and has conquered the USSR. The Soviet Union has totally collapsed and Germany has unfettered access to the heartland of Asia. Japan has defeated the US in the Pacific and forced America to basically withdraw to it's western shoreline. Japan rules over a Pacific centered empire with huge holdings in China and Indochina.. And speaking of China, the war there for all intents and purposes has ended with the withdrawal of outside support for both the Nationalist Chinese and their communist rivals. India has been given independence from Britain and now is basically a vassal state of Japan. Australia is isolated and forced to accept at least a non-aggression pact with Japan.

The time frame of a German vs. Japanese war is sometime around 1943 - 1945. I use this window because for everything up to this point to have the slightest chance of happened, WWII would have had to have been won by Germany & Japan no later than mid-1942. After that point there would be a period of consolidation while both sides put their affairs in order in their newly acquired empires.

Now that we have that settled, we're left with where this war would be fought. Looking at a map of Asia, supposing it to be divided in the manner I described, I'd say the most likely flash-points would be (1) Manchuira (2) India or (3) Persia.

For the sake of arguments, lets say the Germans & Japs come to blows over the most likely of reasons, control of the middle eastern oil. So we have Japan vs. Germany in lets call it 1944 and the two sides will fight a war primarily in Persia.

First let's look at the ground forces of both armies. Here we find a huge difference between the two sides. For the Germans, their army (or as they call it the Heer) is built for a mobile combined arms 3 dimensional battlefield where fast moving armored columns are supported by ground attack aircraft and mobile artillery. Japan on the other hand has it's army very much organized and made primarily as a late WWI era force where there are little to no concentrated armored formations and armor is instead spread out to "support" the infantry which is primarily either footborne or at best truck mounted.

let's look at armored vehincels first. By 1944 the Germand main battle tank would be the Panther. (I'll let the picture tell the tale)

What you're looking at is well sloped, thick armor coupled with a devastating high velocity anti-tank gun.

The Jap main tank at the same time. This is the Type 3 Chi-Nu medium tank.

It's armor is thin and not very well sloped. That gun is a low velocity (680 FPS compared to 1120 FPS for the Panther) 75mm gun.

Long story short, German armored forces (which would vastly outnumber Jap armored formations to start with) would arse rape any Jap tanks that were stupid enough to try and stand and fight.

As for infantry, the Jap infantry is well trained and disciplined but they lack battlefield firepower as they are all armed with the sub-par pre-WWI era bolt action Arisaka rifle and the cumbersome Type 92 machine gun spread out thinly at the company level.



And even those formations lucky enough to have a magazine fed Type 96 LMG would still be equipped with a weapon totally outclassed by the German belt fed MG 42.


The German infantry, in addition to being almost totally mechanized, are by 1944 all equipped with at least semi-automatic and in many cases automatic rifles that all support the devastating MG42 which is liberally spread out at the squad level.



The bottom line is that a German infantry company will be able to completely dominate a similar or even larger Jap body when it comes to both maneuver and column of firepower on the battle field. Just as the German armored formations would dominate their Jap counterparts, the same would be true for the infantry.

The final aspect on the ground to look at is artillery, once again a picture is worth a thousand words...

German artillery...

That's a battery of German Hummel 150cm SP howitzers. Fully mobile, highly accurate, able to keep pace wit hte fast moving German armored columns.


That's the Jap Type 38 15cm howitzer. It was the primary Jap artillery piece at the time. As you can see, totally outclassed by it's German counterparts.

So As you can see the German ground forces would totally outclass their Jap adversaries in every conceivable manner. A meeting of these two armies would result in a complete rout of the Jap forces.

That's enough for now, next well look at air power...
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 10:25 am
Posted by hardhead
stinky bayou
Member since Jun 2009
5745 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 10:34 am to
As far as the naval aspect goes it would come down to who had aircraft carriers?

They made battleships almost obsolite.

The German army outclassed the Japanese by far, so did the air force (luftewaffe).
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64427 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

As far as the naval aspect goes it would come down to who had aircraft carriers?

They made battleships almost obsolite.

The German army outclassed the Japanese by far, so did the air force (luftewaffe).



I'll get into that later but for now I will say that the fact Japan possessed a large fleet of aircraft carriers would have not saved them in a war against Germany.
Posted by hardhead
stinky bayou
Member since Jun 2009
5745 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

I'll get into that later but for now I will say that the fact Japan possessed a large fleet of aircraft carriers would have not saved them in a war against Germany


I couldn't agree more.

The battle of the North Atlantic proved that an inferior navy could win a supply war.

The Navy is a support force, and has been since ships of the line.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram