Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 16
Started By
Message

Ignorant BR PD Officer w/ FBI

Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:55 am
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:55 am
Has anybody dealt with this officer, who doesn't seem to give a frick about a citizen's rights under the constitution?

Come on, LEO. Quit trampling our rights and inadequately training the young guys to do the same. I know that the constitution makes your job more difficult, but you and I both know that there are plenty of bullshite loopholes that allow you to circumvent the public's rights, so you don't have to take it a step further and shite on the constitution too.

YT video of the entire interaction; the contact with the unlawful LEO starts at ~2 minutes
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 2:18 pm
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48927 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:57 am to
kern
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
39784 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:00 am to
Have fun being harassed by LEO's in 2019
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41613 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:05 am to
I wish people could get "detained" on here for acting weird.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

I wish people could get "detained" on here for acting weird.

place would shut down
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
20334 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:09 am to
Why was this dipshit taping the building anyway?
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Why was this dipshit taping the building anyway?



At the end he says he does this because hes a journalist and its to see the reaction of law enforcement.
Posted by broadhead
Member since Oct 2014
2109 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Why was this dipshit taping the building anyway?


What's is matter why?
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65694 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:13 am to
Hey Poli-tard

Move it to your mother station’s base.

Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
5861 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Why was this dip shite taping the building anyway?


Trying to provoke law enforcement and get something "wrong" on tape. They did the same thing to the entrance of Camp Beauregard a couple of years ago. Wish this jackass would go video the front of Tripple S Food Mart at 2:00 in the morning.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
65988 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:15 am to
so,this guy goes around taking pictures of building and looking for a response?
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Ignorant BR PD Officer w/ FBI

Ignorant or arrogant?
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18905 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:16 am to
Are you the guy who made this video? And what in the everliving frick is an “audit”?
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Ignorant

was going to point out that was the wrong term, OP is ignorant of the defintion
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:21 am to
Jackass is annoying but the cop totally violated his rights.

It's 2018. How does law enforcement not know how to handle situations like this?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Why was this dipshit taping the building anyway?
He tells the BR detective near the end of the video that he goes around and videos public buildings to see what kind of response he gets from police.

So, he got a response and then acts like a prick about it. I have a feeling every time he videos somewhere and he doesn't get a response he's disappointed.

My question: the video guy says police officers do not have the right to ask a person for his name. I thought an officer has the right to ask a person for his name. Does anybody here know what's correct?
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 11:23 am
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63329 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:27 am to
quote:

And what in the everliving frick is an “audit”?


He's a Scientologist.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3360 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:28 am to
The guy in the video sounds like a jackass. He even has a go fund me link under the video to support his endeavors harassing law enforcement.

On a side note, is there really a huge devide between the citizens and police here? It seems to me the area police departments have a lot of support in general.
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Ignorant or arrogant?


I don't know. It could be either or neither.

Our police seem to have a problem with the whole reasonable suspicion based on articulable fact thing. Is that bc it is a difficult concept or bc they couldn't give a shite about how they acquire whatever information that they seek?

It blows my mind how many people don't give a shite that our law enforcement regularly tramples people's rights to get their job done more easily. Like a lot of you, I don't have to worry about it, bc I am a law abiding citizen, but where does it stop if we don't stop it? When do our authority figures decide that they've infringed on enough of our rights?

This guy does go around and "starts shite". He legally videos public buildings and public servants, waits on the police to arrive, and tries to explain to them how to legally police the citizens of our country. Unfortunately, most of the agencies don't know how to constitutionally police us or they don't care.
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 11:40 am
Posted by jmorr34
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
2888 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:29 am to
quote:

y question: the video guy says police officers do not have the right to ask a person for his name. I thought an officer has the right to ask a person for his name. Does anybody here know what's correct?


They can if they have reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed, is being committed, or is about to be committed.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram