- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How this Metairie doctor got rich by suing health care companies
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:42 am to REG861
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:42 am to REG861
Dr. LaCorte embodies both sides of the debate. He once got a letter from a federal prosecutor's office praising his "good citizenry" in a suit that helped win the government $187 million.
But his track record is mixed. Of his 10 cases that have concluded, he failed to win a payout in five. A judge who threw out one of his suits called it a "threadbare" recitation of public information.
His two other suits are pending. The government has joined one and declined to join the other, which the defendant calls "glaringly deficient."
Dr. LaCorte says all his allegations sprang out of his practice, that money wasn't his main motivator and that even some of his unsuccessful suits helped government cases. "I did not go looking for most of it," he says of the allegations behind his suits. "It came to me."
Would-be whistleblowers got new incentives in 1986, when Congress enacted higher potential rewards and easier filing procedures for people who sue under the 1863 False Claims Act, or "Lincoln Law," which penalizes companies or people who defraud government programs.
But his track record is mixed. Of his 10 cases that have concluded, he failed to win a payout in five. A judge who threw out one of his suits called it a "threadbare" recitation of public information.
His two other suits are pending. The government has joined one and declined to join the other, which the defendant calls "glaringly deficient."
Dr. LaCorte says all his allegations sprang out of his practice, that money wasn't his main motivator and that even some of his unsuccessful suits helped government cases. "I did not go looking for most of it," he says of the allegations behind his suits. "It came to me."
Would-be whistleblowers got new incentives in 1986, when Congress enacted higher potential rewards and easier filing procedures for people who sue under the 1863 False Claims Act, or "Lincoln Law," which penalizes companies or people who defraud government programs.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:49 am to RedRifle
I I have nothing but props for this guy. He found a legal way to make millions.
Docs hate insurance companies.
Docs hate insurance companies.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:51 am to RedRifle
google "qui tam"
been around for a while.
been around for a while.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 10:12 am to RedRifle
Don't hate the player hate the game.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 10:25 am to RedRifle
quote:
But his track record is mixed. Of his 10 cases that have concluded, he failed to win a payout in five. A judge who threw out one of his suits called it a "threadbare" recitation of public information.
I'm always for catching Medicare fraud, but how many millions of dollars has this douchebag made healthcare companies waste by bringing up five bs law suits.
Bringing bs suits waste a ton of money in healthcare and drives healthcare cost up for everybody. I don't like that people can get rich just by throwing around lawsuits and seeing what sticks. Healthcare companies and providers are defending themselves from false claims everyday which drives up the cost.
Wonder how this doc would feel if his patients started suing for bs and he was having to spend his money to defend bs lawsuits.
This post was edited on 7/24/14 at 10:27 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News