re: Has any official said “we ain’t found no motive yet” regarding Vegas?

quote:

---

Because that's not a cool story. There has to be some isis, CIA, Hollywood, NWO, elites, trump massive global conspiracy

---

That's disingenuous and you know it. We have the most extensive and expansive law enforcement apparatus in world history. Our technology allows us to do things that would have boggled minds 2 decades ago. We're talking about the largest mass shooting in American history, news coverage has vanished and law enforcement still says they don't have a motive. Do you honestly find it hard to believe that the same government who lied about Vietnam, WMD's and NSA spying programs isn't being straight with the American public?

quote:

---

That's disingenuous and you know it. We have the most extensive and expansive law enforcement apparatus in world history. Our technology allows us to do things that would have boggled minds 2 decades ago. We're talking about the largest mass shooting in American history, news coverage has vanished and law enforcement still says they don't have a motive. Do you honestly find it hard to believe that the same government who lied about Vietnam, WMD's and NSA spying programs isn't being straight with the American public?

---

quote:

---

Or are they just not saying anything one way or the other yet?

---

They aren't saying, but the current "official" narrative is that they have not found one as of now.

But there have been multiple piece of information they either change, refuse to talk about, or previously said and now refuse to talk about.

Either it's the worst run investigation I've ever seen, or they are hiding something they don't want the public to know, both options coming to you courtesy of the FBI.

I'm leaning towards the second one. I firmly believe they know the motive, but aren't releasing it for some unknown reason.

Mainly because of 1 exchange between a reporter, Sheriff Lombardo, and a FBI agent at the press conference on Monday, Oct 11th. And 2 major discrepancies in the official narrative

When a reporter asked Lombardo how many cell phones Paddock had, he didn't know the answer and turned to an FBI agent in the room and repeated the question. To which the agent said "I don't believe it's prudent we give out that information". Then Lombardo turned to the reporter and said, "I don't know how many devices he had".

It was asked because Paddock's brother had stated Paddock always carried 2 cell phones from 2 different carriers in case 1 of them lost signal he could still make a call when needed.

If Paddock a loaner who only gambled and took cruises, does it matter if the public knows how many cell phones he had? It's a very innocuous question, it's strange that it wouldn't be "prudent" to simply answer it with a number.

Also, since the FBI and Sheriff's dept have both stated Paddock was a loaner who barely talked to his own family, had no friends, didnt work, and no longer had any rental properties. So why does he need 2 cell phones? What conversations were so important he had to have a backup phone to make sure they occurred?

This also makes it obvious the FBI are the ones handling the investigation, and they only give out information to LVMPD and the Sheriff as warranted.

Discrepancies

A) They claim Paddock fired 200 rounds through his door at the officers who had formed an ad hoc SWAT team, as they approached his room around 12 minutes after the shooting. However, none of them ever made a radio call that shots were being fired at them, which they are required to do by department regulations. We have the recordings from that night, and they never mention it.

B) The sheriff previously stated there was a note that contained numbers in the room, but they were still researching their meaning. Then on 60 Minutes, officers, who were on the team that breached the room, stated they knew the numbers were "range" calculations for the shooting location, when they read the note after breaching the room.

Then, at the presser on Monday, Oct 11th, the Sheriff was asked by a reporter to "clarify the note's contents". To which he replied "I'm not at liberty to discuss that". What changed in less than 24 hours? He had already commented on the note's contents 4 days earlier, and the officers had stated it's contents the night before, so why was the sheriff no longer "at liberty" to talk about the note?

TLDR: People died, America cried, and the FBI lied.

quote:

---

A) They claim Paddock fired 200 rounds through his door at the officers who had formed an ad hoc SWAT team, as they approached his room around 12 minutes after the shooting. However, none of them ever made a radio call that shots were being fired at them, which they are required to do by department regulations. We have the recordings from that night, and they never mention it.

---

How do you know?

Wouldn't it be possible and completely plausible they did not use the main radio net due to the havok occurring outside? Every agency of that size has multiple nets, some are recorded and some are not.

To the rest of your posts there are logical explanations for all of it but if you can't conclude that on your own, me typing it out won't either.

No kidding

But if the entire story is that he's a loner nutjob it doesn't take 3 weeks to determine as much

I wish the government would create a conspiracy theorist convention and then diabolically kill the conspiracy theorist that are asking too many important questions.

quote:

---

But if the entire story is that he's a loner nutjob it doesn't take 3 weeks to determine as much

---

I don't follow, to be honest.

If that's the entire story, you're still going to investigate the hell out of every crumb of evidence you can find before making that your official conclusion, so it could take months before they give up and decide they can't find any evidence other than to just say he was a loner nutjob.

quote:

---

They've gone on record saying there are "thousands" of leads though

Not really sure a loner would lead to such an extensive investigation ?

---

Like I said, they're going to investigate every possible thing.

Seems pretty normal to me.

...for a loner?

Lord have mercy. This is too funny

The sheriff also said there is no possible way that this guy planned this alone

Head sheriff: no way this guy did this alone
OT lounge: just a lone crazy guy it takes years to reach that conclusion as well

Yes loner investigations get wrapped up with the quickness because there are no leads to pursue . No massive data circles to come through