- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Greed
Posted on 4/3/24 at 5:29 am
Posted on 4/3/24 at 5:29 am
The article recently about the guy in Zachary, Pigrenet, who took the $2,000 before thinking about the longterm effects of the diversion canal project. Well how about, the Florida Gas Company on Lower Zachary Road did the same thing and redirected their water runoff to the neighbors ditches on both sides of the street. Now they have huge unwanted lilies/plants living in their ditches and water is in a constant pool. Never dries up, even during hot summer. Residents can’t maintain their ditches, because it’s too wet. What can be done legally i’d like to know. If the residents pool their money together and get a lawyer, that be one good payout.
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 5:32 am
7
Posted on 4/3/24 at 5:32 am to Yetna72
Wonderful thread title mate
Posted on 4/3/24 at 5:37 am to Yetna72
quote:
Greed
For lack of a better word, is good
Posted on 4/3/24 at 5:37 am to Yetna72
Getting 2000 dollars is greedy?
Posted on 4/3/24 at 5:40 am to Yetna72
There are a lot of words that rhyme with "greed".
Posted on 4/3/24 at 5:52 am to Yetna72
You’re probably going to get anchored if you don’t improve the title. Fwiw.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 6:20 am to Yetna72
quote:
Greed
Odd choice. Does not match the article.
Makes us wonder if your name is Karen.
If 2 people consent to the price of a transaction, who is the greedy one?
Is every consensual transaction a greedy transaction? Or just ones that Karens disagree with?
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 8:15 am
Posted on 4/3/24 at 6:36 am to Willie Stroker
Just ones that Karens disagree with. What’s up with Karen’s and NIMBY’s desire to decide what someone else can do with their property? “It will affect my property values!” With zero evidence to support such claims. There’s *gasp* lilies in the ditch!
Posted on 4/3/24 at 7:22 am to Yetna72
As soon as I saw that yesterday I thought that guy should have asked tOT if he should believe a large company will take care of his property if allowed to access. Damn shame tOT could have saved this man from all of this.
ETA: chicken should reach out with a temporary premium membership to help get this guy get straightened out into a BAW.
ETA: chicken should reach out with a temporary premium membership to help get this guy get straightened out into a BAW.
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 7:25 am
Posted on 4/3/24 at 12:48 pm to themunch
It bloody well is mate when you overlook the longterm effect, which he’s paying for now. All he heard was $2,000 to pocket for extra this & that. That’s how those big corps do. They dangle fruit in front of the poor to avoid a legal battle.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News