- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Father of Child Murdered at Sandy Hook Faces Death Threats
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:13 pm to Tigerlaff
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:13 pm to Tigerlaff
quote:I haven't posted on this board very long, but based on 2 threads I have seen on it. ..I think there are more than that.
Are you telling me there are like 5-10 posters ON THIS BOARD that believe Sandy Hook was a hoax???
0
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
here is a level of Hell reserved for these people.
Do you believe in hell?
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:20 pm to uway
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:24 pm to Othello
My (main) problem with these theories is that they assume dozens of regular citizens are "in on it." Like just paying off regular people to cover this shite off would work, and this whole thing can be quietly and successfully coordinated. Yet, according to the Wikipedia page on Operation Northwoods, the Department of Defense noted that given our current system it would be incredibly difficult to keep something like this quiet, and only the highest level folks can know about it. And this was in 1962.
quote:
Any of the contrived situations described above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation."[
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:35 pm to LSUJuice
As I always say-- We live in a world where the president can't get a consensual beej from an intern without everyone finding out. And you want me to believe in a conspiracy to make up a mass killing that would involve dozens of federal, state and local officials? That one person wouldn't crack from guilt or find Jesus and scream about how they were put up to this?
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:46 pm to Othello
quote:
, it's from wikipedia which is extremely anti CT.
:rotflmao:
Just to be clear, this guy thinks wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, has a bias against conspiracy theorists. Hahaha what an absolute dumbass
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:50 pm to Grim
You're such a genius you didn't see where I posted the exact same thing from ABCNews.
You were in such a hurry to be a smartass that you didnt even read the whole thread.
You were in such a hurry to be a smartass that you didnt even read the whole thread.
This post was edited on 1/15/16 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 1/15/16 at 3:07 pm to Othello
You shouldn't be laughing at anyone. You are the one that is clearly mentally unstable.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 3:11 pm to Othello
I assume since you didn't respond to my question you have done more research on your wacky Vietnam CT and realize it has been debunked?
Posted on 1/15/16 at 3:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
Where were the bodies? Why did the school not have a permit for over 2 years? Why wa a parent giggling 5 seconds before a press conference then in tears 5 seconds later? Where were the other students in that school?
Posted on 1/15/16 at 3:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
That professor has a seat reserved for him in Hell right next to Benjamin Haas 
Posted on 1/15/16 at 3:46 pm to Othello
quote:
You're such a genius you didn't see where I posted the exact same thing from ABCNews.
But I thought you said the CIA controls the media. Answer this question honestly: how many of your opinions were formed from YouTube videos?
Posted on 1/15/16 at 3:59 pm to LeonPhelps
Count you in this group?
You and everyone else in this group are total pieces of shite
You and everyone else in this group are total pieces of shite
Posted on 1/15/16 at 4:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
This is fascinating for some sick reason. It would literally never have occurred to me, even for a second, that there might be people out there who think that Sandy Hook is faked, much less that they've generated these elaborate theories and explanations, much less that they've literally sent certified mail to the parents demanding photos and copies of death certificates. .
Posted on 1/15/16 at 4:24 pm to Cold Cous Cous
quote:
his is fascinating for some sick reason. It would literally never have occurred to me, even for a second, that there might be people out there who think that Sandy Hook is faked
Believe it. There are some seriously mentally fcked up people out there and the internet lets them all have a voice just like us. I wonder what the disorder would be called for these nut jobs?
Posted on 1/15/16 at 4:36 pm to CaptSpaulding
Here is Carl Berstein writing on cIa contol of the media. I don't get my info from youtube, I knew someone in the FBI, dated her actually for three years but most of this stuff is declassifed.
Berstein was half of Woodward and Bernstein who broke Watergate. Take his word for it, not mine.
CIA and the Media
Berstein was half of Woodward and Bernstein who broke Watergate. Take his word for it, not mine.
CIA and the Media
quote:
Sulzberger says he was asked to sign the secrecy agreement in the 1950s. “A guy came around and said, ‘You are a responsible newsman and we need you to sign this if we are going to show you anything classified.’ I said I didn’t want to get entangled and told them, ‘Go to my uncle [Arthur Hays Sulzberger, then publisher of the New York Times] and if he says to sign it I will.’” His uncle subsequently signed such an agreement, Sulzberger said, and he thinks he did too, though he is unsure. “I don’t know, twenty-some years is a long time.” He described the whole question as “a bubble in a bathtub.”
This post was edited on 1/15/16 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 1/15/16 at 4:36 pm to notiger1997
If the government did want to enact more gun control, which half of it does, getting involved in mass shootings is the best way to do it in a free press society like we have. Well, maybe executive order is the best, followed by involvement in shootings that frighten the public, done by the public. But to think people weren't killed at Sandy Hook is crazy. Any involvement by gun control sectors of the government wouldn't be to pretend something like this happened when it didn't, the involvement would be simply getting someone to do something terrible, then bring in their own investigators to sort through the evidence. I don't think that happened here, but that's what I'd do if I wanted to disarm the public. The threat always has to be within the group you're taking down, or at least appear to be from within.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 4:40 pm to Othello
I'm personally 50/50. The way they handled everything was very odd
Posted on 1/15/16 at 4:47 pm to Othello
I'm still confused. Can we or can we not trust ABC News?
Posted on 1/15/16 at 4:48 pm to Lionnation1993
This thread started about a father receiving death threats and how that's bad, then look at all the people in here wishing for people to die and burn in hell for not believing the official story.
The irony is epic.
The irony is epic.
Page 5 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News