- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Exxon Mobil CEO on the ‘dirty secret’ of Net Zero
Posted on 2/27/24 at 8:18 pm to ragincajun03
Posted on 2/27/24 at 8:18 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
ragincajun03Exxon Mobil CEO on the ‘dirty secret’ of Net Zero
That really wasn’t a secret to anyone with an ounce of common sense
Posted on 2/27/24 at 8:24 pm to ragincajun03
The premise is flawed. “Net zero” emissions is unnecessary and a concept dreamed up by the climate change cult which is driven by an effort to control the living standards of the masses while our overlords do whatever they want. Produce cheap energy, use hydro, nuclear, natural gas, clean coal and other methods where they are efficient. Minimize pollution as much as you can.
Quit trying to control the world.
Quit trying to control the world.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 8:26 pm to turkish
quote:
Not to be contrary (we’re kinda splitting hairs) but I work in energy. I work with this stuff daily. The prices of consumer goods will be untenable without .gov interaction in a low carbon system, without generational technological breakthroughs. The taxpayer will fund that .gov interaction. Woods talks about this toward the end of the article, referring to subsidies.
I think you have to believe that the "climate change" problem is actually real, man-made, and then, possible for man to "solve".
I would consider that science, unsettled at best.
Do our actions affect the environment around us, sure, but to what extent is the real question.
And what is the point of punishing our economy and citizens while the bulk of the other developing nations are firing up coal plants weekly?
I think there has to be balance between clean energy and affordable energy.
And as other posters have stated, Nuclear blows all the other current options out of the water. And we have that technology today.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 8:35 pm to AndyCBR
Agree. Either 1) the problem has to be existential or 2) there needs to be major technological breakthrough. In the absence of either the ends don’t justify the means.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 8:39 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
It has long maintained that greenhouse gas emissions, not fossil fuels, are behind climate change—claims over which it is now being sued.
Support the narrative or else.
God I hate progs.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 8:42 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Support the narrative or else.
Narrative uber alles! Sieg Heil!
Now about those murdering Jews.....
/progressive
Posted on 2/27/24 at 8:42 pm to No Colors
quote:
And when it costs $80 to charge your smart car to drive 200 miles, even the pink hair enviro wackos are going to wonder what they've bought
Nuh uhhh...
GO AWAY!!! Baitin'.....
If you've seen Idiocracy, you can draw a mental picture.
Sadly, it has become an accurate picture instead of a caricature.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 10:26 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
It has long maintained that greenhouse gas emissions, not fossil fuels, are behind climate change
Someone explain this part to me. I thought fossil fuels were considered to be the major factor in greenhouse effect.
ETA: is this why we've seen such a big push against farming and cow gas? So O&G execs can point the finger somewhere else?
This post was edited on 2/27/24 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 2/29/24 at 9:29 pm to PowerTool
quote:
It has long maintained that greenhouse gas emissions, not fossil fuels, are behind climate change
Someone explain this part to me. I thought fossil fuels were considered to be the major factor in greenhouse effect.
ETA: is this why we've seen such a big push against farming and cow gas? So O&G execs can point the finger somewhere else?
Shifting narrative.
They have pounded the fossil fuel propaganda so long it has "saturated the market" so to speak.
All the useful idiots who are going to buy it have already been captured.
Now they slightly re-word the stories to create a new strawman. People who weren't triggered by the old catch phrases and scare tactics are new targets with the modified language.
Posted on 2/29/24 at 9:32 pm to ragincajun03
Now do Illegals
Same concept
Same concept
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News