Started By
Message

Do you think NASA could put another man on the moon in a 7 year timeframe?

Posted on 3/5/16 at 12:44 am
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20900 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 12:44 am
Just got done watching "The Right Stuff". Great movie. It got me thinking how big of a feat Apollo 11 was, to basically design a system to put a man on the moon with nothing more than a slide rule, a navigational calculator with the computing power of your graphing calculator, and paper.

For the unawares, JFK called for the US to put a man on the moon in 1962. Apollo 11 happened in 1969. Personally I doubt NASA could do it again within the same timeframe.

A good diagram that put things in perspective on just how difficult Apollo 11 was


Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72215 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 12:47 am to
We've done it. I think the next objective has to be Mars for the longevity of our species.
Posted by stinkdawg
Savannah, smoking by the gas cans
Member since Aug 2014
4072 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 12:55 am to
I think with the CGI we have today, anything is possible.
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
16116 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 12:57 am to
Aliens don't want us on the moon. They have a base on the dark side of the moon.
Posted by tt54l32v
Member since Oct 2012
832 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 1:25 am to
Money buys a lot of things, and that is all it would require lots and lots of money. Would not take 7 years either.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 1:27 am to
Would not take anywhere close to seven years. The goal is humans on an asteroid in 9 years and 14-19 for Mars.

Both are much much more complex that a return to the moon.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 1:32 am to
quote:

I think the next objective has to be Mars for the longevity of our species.


Our galaxy will collide with another in a million years or so, making the area of space the sun is in uninhabitable in the process.

So we'd better either invent faster-than-light travel, or else launch a generation ship to reseed mankind in an unaffected part of either galaxy.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164267 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 1:43 am to
No because Obama killed NASA
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98200 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 1:45 am to
quote:

Our galaxy will collide with another in a million years or so, making the area of space the sun is in uninhabitable in the process.


If we survive that long, we will have the ability to manipulate time and space.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72215 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 1:46 am to
quote:

No because Obama killed NASA


Support 1%.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72215 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 1:48 am to
quote:

Our galaxy will collide with another in a million years or so, making the area of space the sun is in uninhabitable in the process.

So we'd better either invent faster-than-light travel, or else launch a generation ship to reseed mankind in an unaffected part of either galaxy.



Baby steps. We need the objective of Mars, to leap our species to its potential. We will never agree on athletic facilities but I think we can get on a similar plane of technology.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98200 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 1:59 am to
Thanks to movie credits, it would be filmed in Louisiana
Posted by TheLegend
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2013
2739 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 2:00 am to
The goal is Europa.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 2:07 am to
quote:

We will never agree on athletic facilities


Perspective.

quote:

but I think we can get on a similar plane of technology


As long as it's ready in time...(tRant joke)...I'm down with anything.
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
34786 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 2:09 am to
If given the proper funding we could do it within the year. No doubt about that.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72215 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 2:26 am to
Like I said...1%
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72215 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 2:28 am to

quote:

Perspective.






quote:

As long as it's ready in time...(tRant joke)...I'm down with anything.



Mars is the objective that stretches our ability.
Posted by Anim
Member since Feb 2014
3 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 2:31 am to
quote:

If given the proper funding we could do it within the year. No doubt about that.


This. Maybe more than a couple years as we'd have to build everything from scratch, but the technology has existed for decades. No one will fund a moon mission though.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164267 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 3:04 am to
Michoud would make the spacecraft blow up again.
This post was edited on 3/5/16 at 3:05 am
Posted by The Mountaineer
Member since Mar 2013
35 posts
Posted on 3/5/16 at 4:43 am to
Man has never left the earths orbit. Too much radiation. Why do you think the Russians and Chinese have never done it?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram