- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DEI, FDA, etc. affects on language
Posted on 3/7/24 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 3/7/24 at 7:45 pm
I understand language changing due to time, but the amount of words added to urban dictionaries and definitions revised in the past 5 years is an anomaly.
In Example: Why would you re-define a word, “vaccine,” before an EUA was to expire?
In Example: Why would you re-define a word, “vaccine,” before an EUA was to expire?
7
Posted on 3/7/24 at 7:51 pm to gmac8604
*effects
Posted on 3/7/24 at 7:51 pm to gmac8604
their reasoning was they had to clarify that vaccines did not mean 100% effective, because during covid it became clear a lot of people did not understand that isn't the case.
it's like we were spoiled into thinking vaccines were always as good as they are now.
Just looking at polio, The Salk vaccine had been 60–70% effective against PV1 (poliovirus type 1), over 90% effective against PV2 and PV3, and 94% effective against the development of bulbar polio.
Two doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) are 90% effective or more against paralytic polio; three doses are 99% to 100% effective.
it's like we were spoiled into thinking vaccines were always as good as they are now.
Just looking at polio, The Salk vaccine had been 60–70% effective against PV1 (poliovirus type 1), over 90% effective against PV2 and PV3, and 94% effective against the development of bulbar polio.
Two doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) are 90% effective or more against paralytic polio; three doses are 99% to 100% effective.
Posted on 3/7/24 at 7:54 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
because during covid it became clear a lot of people did not understand that isn't the case.
quote:
You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.
Literally said by the president of the United States, wonder why people thought that.
Posted on 3/7/24 at 7:55 pm to gmac8604
How is the food and drug administration affecting language?
Posted on 3/7/24 at 8:07 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
Literally said by the president of the United States, wonder why people thought that.
Because early on the (limited) data suggested that vaccinated people didn’t get Covid infections and didn’t spread it. Turned out to be wrong so they stopped saying that. Not that hard to understand
Posted on 3/7/24 at 8:10 pm to rundmcrun
quote:
How is the food and drug administration affecting language?
How would you define “Bioengineered food” on an ingredients label?
Posted on 3/7/24 at 8:15 pm to pkloa
quote:
*effects
I used the correct term - talking presently and not downstream.
Posted on 3/7/24 at 8:34 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
their reasoning was they had to clarify that vaccines did not mean 100% effective, because during covid it became clear a lot of people did not understand that isn't the case. it's like we were spoiled into thinking vaccines were always as good as they are now. Just looking at polio, The Salk vaccine had been 60–70% effective against PV1 (poliovirus type 1), over 90% effective against PV2 and PV3, and 94% effective against the development of bulbar polio. Two doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) are 90% effective or more against paralytic polio; three doses are 99% to 100% effective.
It’s more than that, the definition of “vaccine” changed from that of: (a) a weakened RNA virus, to (b), a weakened RNA virus OR a synthetic RNA implant, which are clearly 2 distinct things.
Posted on 3/7/24 at 9:14 pm to VOLhalla
(no message)
Posted on 3/7/24 at 9:17 pm to gmac8604
The ability to destroy a thing is absolute control over it
Posted on 3/7/24 at 9:20 pm to VOLhalla
“early on the ( limited ) data suggested that vaccinated people didn’t get Covid infections and didn’t spread it”
Dr.Birx (scarf lady) said in her book that they knew from the beginning the “vax” wasn’t going to prevent infections or stop the spread.
I didn’t actually read her book but 3 or 4 pissed off reviewers on Amazon wrote that she said that.
Dr.Birx (scarf lady) said in her book that they knew from the beginning the “vax” wasn’t going to prevent infections or stop the spread.
I didn’t actually read her book but 3 or 4 pissed off reviewers on Amazon wrote that she said that.
Posted on 3/7/24 at 9:24 pm to gmac8604
quote:Pacificly watt, James?
DEI, FDA, etc. affects on language
Posted on 3/7/24 at 9:26 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
Because early on the (limited) data suggested that vaccinated people didn’t get Covid infections and didn’t spread it. Turned out to be wrong so they stopped saying that. Not that hard to understand
bullshite, the fact that you actually believe that is ridiculous. Warp Speed was nothing more than a lie that Trump and millions fell for.
Posted on 3/7/24 at 9:44 pm to LSUA 75
quote:
Dr.Birx (scarf lady) said in her book that they knew from the beginning the “vax” wasn’t going to prevent infections or stop the spread. I didn’t actually read her book but 3 or 4 pissed off reviewers on Amazon wrote that she said that.
Doesn’t that mean the vaccine should have been defined as a gene-altering avenue rather than a vaccine?
Posted on 3/8/24 at 4:25 am to gmac8604
quote:
Why would you re-define a word, “vaccine,” before an EUA was to expire?
Because we are a stupid populace that traded experimental juice for a free donut.
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:38 pm to gmac8604
People talk like retards on social media.
“What was mans thinking “
“What was mans thinking “
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:52 pm to pkloa
That word sucks let’s just all admit it
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News