- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Could you torture a terrorist?
Posted on 1/12/15 at 6:55 am to bhtigerfan
Posted on 1/12/15 at 6:55 am to bhtigerfan
Death by a thousand cuts. I would peel the skin off of that m*fer.
1
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:21 am to Spaceman Spiff
yes
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:22 am to bhtigerfan
You mean like shoving barbed wire up his pee hole? Yeah... prolly so.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:27 am to terd ferguson
quote:
You mean like shoving barbed wire up his pee hole? Yeah... prolly so.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:30 am to bhtigerfan
Yes, if they had a family member or not. They hate out way of life, and would do it to any of us in a heartbeat. I'm with Howard Stern on this one, I say put every one of those mother frickers down for good.
Torturing gains valuable info that leads to saving western lives.
I like to think I'd begin with a method I heard talked about by an old timer around a campfire.
1. Take them to an empty shack in the middle of a compound.
2. Sit them down in a chair that is fastened to the floor, in the middle of the shack.
3. Staple/nail their nutsack/shaft to the seat of the chair.
4. Give them a rusty/dull knife.
5. Light the shack on fire.
6. ???
7. Profit, by self castration.
Torturing gains valuable info that leads to saving western lives.
I like to think I'd begin with a method I heard talked about by an old timer around a campfire.
1. Take them to an empty shack in the middle of a compound.
2. Sit them down in a chair that is fastened to the floor, in the middle of the shack.
3. Staple/nail their nutsack/shaft to the seat of the chair.
4. Give them a rusty/dull knife.
5. Light the shack on fire.
6. ???
7. Profit, by self castration.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:32 am to efrad
quote:
else I'm no better than they are.
It's troubling to be how few people get this. I hope it's just talk and this would prevail in reality. It also helps that we still live in a society where few would get the opportunity.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:34 am to bhtigerfan
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:36 am to McLemore
quote:
It also helps that we still live in a society where few would get the opportunity
...still live in a society BECAUSE a few are allowed the opportunity.
FIFY
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:38 am to terd ferguson
Yes. And with pleasure, publicly if possible.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:42 am to bhtigerfan
Most subjects will break on an approach short of torture.
Torture is neither desired, nor necessarily effective in 99.9999% of interrogations because the information gleaned will be of very suspect value without other corroboration. To that end, I do not believe that "rough" interrogation methods constitute torture, either. I'm talking about climate control, sleep deprivation, even drug assisted interrogation - nothing that causes permanent damage to the subject should rightly be considered torture in the modern age.
There is an axiom in human intelligence: "Everybody wants to tell everyone else, everything they know, all the time." All one has to do is facilitate that to break a subject during interrogation. Again, with torture, you're likely to get the answers the subject thinks you want. I certainly don't want that - I want accurate information.
"Torture" is a tool of sadists.
(ETA: Nevermind - I thought we were trying to prevent something. To answer the OP's question - I would merely execute the terrorist under your hypothetical.)
Torture is neither desired, nor necessarily effective in 99.9999% of interrogations because the information gleaned will be of very suspect value without other corroboration. To that end, I do not believe that "rough" interrogation methods constitute torture, either. I'm talking about climate control, sleep deprivation, even drug assisted interrogation - nothing that causes permanent damage to the subject should rightly be considered torture in the modern age.
There is an axiom in human intelligence: "Everybody wants to tell everyone else, everything they know, all the time." All one has to do is facilitate that to break a subject during interrogation. Again, with torture, you're likely to get the answers the subject thinks you want. I certainly don't want that - I want accurate information.
"Torture" is a tool of sadists.
(ETA: Nevermind - I thought we were trying to prevent something. To answer the OP's question - I would merely execute the terrorist under your hypothetical.)
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 7:45 am
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:46 am to bhtigerfan
I've always that it would be cool to tie one down in a big ant pile and check back the next day. Maybe pour some grease or something on them
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:50 am to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
quote:
Torturing gains valuable info that leads to saving western lives.
Link?
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:51 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Torture is neither desired, nor necessarily effective in 99.9999% of interrogations because the information gleaned will be of very suspect value without other corroboration. To that end, I do not believe that "rough" interrogation methods constitute torture, either. I'm talking about climate control, sleep deprivation, even drug assisted interrogation - nothing that causes permanent damage to the subject should rightly be considered torture in the modern age.
There is an axiom in human intelligence: "Everybody wants to tell everyone else, everything they know, all the time." All one has to do is facilitate that to break a subject during interrogation. Again, with torture, you're likely to get the answers the subject thinks you want. I certainly don't want that - I want accurate information.
"Torture" is a tool of sadists.
I'm not looking for answers, bruh.....just revenge.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:51 am to bhtigerfan
I would most definitely torture the frick out of them.
Even if none of my family was hurt by them.
I would do it just because terrorists are the scum of the earth and they need to fricking fear me.
Even if none of my family was hurt by them.
I would do it just because terrorists are the scum of the earth and they need to fricking fear me.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:52 am to Ace Midnight
quote:Yeah, I'm more talking about retribution/revenge for killing your loved one. I can imagine the hate and anger I would have towards someone who brutally murdered a family member or your child. Especially people like these ISIS animals who show no remorse. Oh frick I would hurt them.
(ETA: Nevermind - I thought we were trying to prevent something. To answer the OP's question - I would merely execute the terrorist under your hypothetical.)
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:01 am to Breesus
"Creasy's art is death...........and he's about to paint his masterpiece"
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:09 am to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
quote:
...still live in a society BECAUSE a few are allowed the opportunity.
absurdity.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:49 am to bhtigerfan
I don't think I would.
But I would tell them they're dying for nothing, their entire life was a farce and we're going to ultimately prevail and destroy everything they foolishly care about.
Then I'd kill him and try and get on with my life.
But I would tell them they're dying for nothing, their entire life was a farce and we're going to ultimately prevail and destroy everything they foolishly care about.
Then I'd kill him and try and get on with my life.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:51 am to bhtigerfan
Depends on what they did
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:52 am to efrad
quote:
I'd put a bullet in a terrorist's head, but I wouldn't torture any person on this Earth, doesn't matter who, else I'm no better than they are.
This is an incorrect line of thinking that many people use. Terrorist attack innocent people, torturing a terrorist in not attacking an innocent person, therefore torturing a terrorist does not put you on their level.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News