Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Could this be the first direct image of an exoplanet?

Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:16 am
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
9820 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:16 am
This is an older article from 2016, but I've never seen this image before and its significance, if confirmed, is amazing.



quote:

European Southern Observatory (ESO) officials say this could be the first star system discovered to have both a close-in exoplanet and another one that is far-out. “If it is confirmed that CVSO 30c orbits CVSO 30, this would be the first star system to host both a close-in exoplanet detected by the transit method and a far-out exoplanet detected by direct imaging,” ESO officials.


LINK

This could be one for the history books, the first ever direct image of a planet not in our solar system.
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89885 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:18 am to
...or a streetlight.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:19 am to
How many generations would it take to get there?

1,200 light-years away
Posted by Chiefagain
Member since Nov 2016
1808 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:19 am to
This is absolutely amazing.

Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65747 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:19 am to
Posted by Evil Little Thing
Member since Jul 2013
11232 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:26 am to
It's making me kind of dizzy/lightheaded to attempt to comprehend how far away that is. We are so tiny & insignificant. Very cool.
This post was edited on 9/6/17 at 8:27 am
Posted by Red5LSU
Knoxville
Member since Aug 2011
494 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:29 am to
quote:

How many generations would it take to get there?

1,200 light-years away


Since a generation is the average amount of time a group of people are born and grow up, say about 30 years, and a light year is a measurement for distance, your joke makes no sense.
Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
13483 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:37 am to
That's a led light
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:47 am to
No, not the first ever. In fact not even close. The article states it is the first to be imaged that is both a) far away from its host star and also b) that host star has a second but closer planet that was detected by the transit method.

Here's a list of other directly imaged planets. The earliest on that list was imaged in 2004 ( article with picture).
Posted by Konkey Dong
Member since Aug 2013
2166 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:48 am to
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
9820 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:50 am to
quote:

No, not the first ever. In fact not even close. The article states it is the first to be imaged that is both a) far away from its host star and also b) that host star has a second but closer planet that was detected by the transit method. Here's a list of other directly imaged planets. The earliest on that list was imaged in 2004 ( article with picture).


I assumed "Direct imaging" in this instance was with no infrared filters, and just using visible light.

I could be wrong though.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:52 am to
quote:

How many generations would it take to get there?


Depends on how you travel. 1200 light years is extremely close compared with many other stars but extremely far away for us.

If you could get a ship going up to near light speed then time slows down for the travelers. Go fast enough and they could arrive within their own lifetimes. Hell they could go there and come back within their own lifetimes. But over 2400 years would have passed here on Earth.

It's the same effect as was shown in the movie "Interstellar" although there the effect was triggered by being deep in a powerful gravity well. Time dilation is experimentally verified to be real though.

Edit: One of several ways that it's been verified is to take a bunch of radioactive nuclei with a known and very short half-life. Use a particle accelerator to get them going very very fast. Measure their half life, which turns out to be much longer. The difference is as Einstein predicted.
This post was edited on 9/6/17 at 8:54 am
Posted by DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Member since May 2011
19426 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:56 am to
quote:

European Southern Observatory (ESO) officials say this could be the first star system discovered to have both a close-in exoplanet and another one that is far-out. “If it is confirmed that CVSO 30c orbits CVSO 30, this would be the first star system to host both a close-in exoplanet detected by the transit method and a far-out exoplanet detected by direct imaging,” ESO officials.



Posted by LadyTigress
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2017
632 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Go fast enough and they could arrive within their own lifetimes. Hell they could go there and come back within their own lifetimes. But over 2400 years would have passed here on Earth.


Insane to think about. Would not want to come back to earth 2000+years later. Probably not even 100 years later. No telling what kind of freaky shite would be going on by then.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18007 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 10:45 am to
quote:

How many generations would it take to get there?

1,200 light-years away


It can actually be traveled instantly.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29175 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:37 am to
quote:

...or a streetlight.



That's the star, the exoplanet is the small dot to the upper left of it.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55678 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:40 am to
What is an exoplanet

Sorry I'm not a nerd
This post was edited on 9/6/17 at 11:40 am
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29175 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:43 am to
It's just a term to describe planets around stars other than our own.
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
23885 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

If you could get a ship going up to near light speed then time slows down for the travelers. Go fast enough and they could arrive within their own lifetimes. Hell they could go there and come back within their own lifetimes. But over 2400 years would have passed here on Earth.




that scares the shite out of me
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

I assumed "Direct imaging" in this instance was with no infrared filters, and just using visible light.


The first such was Fomalhaut B in 2004.
This post was edited on 9/6/17 at 12:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram