- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Climatology: more hot, dryness for Texas
Posted on 4/24/24 at 12:26 pm to Corinthians420
Posted on 4/24/24 at 12:26 pm to Corinthians420
As CO2 concentrations increase more earthly greening will occur which will impact our climatic temperatures by becoming more temperate (lower highs and higher lows) due to increased atmospheric water vapor from more plants respiring.
I agree that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is man made. The question is, what is the impact?
I'm not concerned about current concentrations but we should slow down our current emissions as much as possible. In terms of government policy they could make nuclear more available (see France). High CO2 concentrations will not have a detrimental effect on climate. But will have a detrimental effect on our physiology when the concentrations get really high (>8000 ppm).
I agree that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is man made. The question is, what is the impact?
I'm not concerned about current concentrations but we should slow down our current emissions as much as possible. In terms of government policy they could make nuclear more available (see France). High CO2 concentrations will not have a detrimental effect on climate. But will have a detrimental effect on our physiology when the concentrations get really high (>8000 ppm).
Posted on 4/24/24 at 12:30 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
What equations did you use to calculate that?
It's just the heat capacity of atmospheric gases and the ratio from the initial to the proposed. This assumes that energy inputs (sun) remain static. If energy inputs do not remain static then you have use q=Cp*dt with the new Cp proportion.
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 4/24/24 at 12:46 pm to GumboPot
quote:
It's just the heat capacity of atmospheric gases and the ratio from the initial to the proposed. This assumes that energy inputs (sun) remain static. If energy inputs do not remain static then you have use q=Cp*dt with the new Cp proportion.
Did you calculate for compounding interest as more heat is trapped in the oceans?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 12:50 pm to BabyTac
Timcast IRL played a climate video from the 70's assuring us that we would be in an ice age by the 2000's! Insanity, all if it.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 12:51 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
Corinthians420
Curious what your degree is in and what you do for a living. You havecsone strong stances in here. Surely you back them up with your own thoughts, right?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:01 pm to Jones
Finance. I haven't inserted any of my own data in here though.
It's really all just math once you study the data.
Whether NASAs or Exxons figure of 2°F increase caused by humans is true or the actual effect is half that, It still brings me to the same conclusion that manmade climate change is occurring.
It's really all just math once you study the data.
Whether NASAs or Exxons figure of 2°F increase caused by humans is true or the actual effect is half that, It still brings me to the same conclusion that manmade climate change is occurring.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:02 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Except Scientology and climatology are literally nothing alike
Except for the fact that they're both made up BS
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:10 pm to coolieaux
quote:
climatology
quote:
Except for the fact that they're both made up BS
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:11 pm to coolieaux
quote:
Except for the fact that they're both made up BS
You sound like a very rational person so I would like you to explain in precise details how humans are able to change the inputs without affecting the output when it comes to the climate?
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:21 pm to Corinthians420
quote:The fact you can make that statement means you’re not actually a climate crazy
There are plenty of reasons it is warming up currently, man being among them
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:24 pm to BabyTac
So nothing is changing? Got it.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 5:57 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
Did you calculate for compounding interest as more heat is trapped in the oceans?
Doesn't matter. The heat capacity is the amount of heat required to change the temperature of a given amount of matter by one degree. It matters not where the energy comes from or in what form. Specific molecules can only hold so much heat (which is a measure of vibration) until the temp is raise one degree as defined by heat capacity. When you have a mixture of molecules the total heat capacity is simply a composite of the mixture.
For example the heat capacity of air with CO2 at 400 ppm is 1.00955823 kilojoule per kelvin. When CO2 is 2000 ppm and the other constituents are decreased proportionally to the increase in CO2 the heat capacity is slightly lowered to 1.00929707817216 kilojoules per kelvin.
Because the Cp is slightly lowered with an increase in CO2 concentration the temp can be raise one degree with less energy when the atmosphere mixture contains 2000 ppm versus 400 ppm.
These are very basic calculations. I would be doing the same type of calculations to size a boiler or heat exchanger.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:01 pm to BabyTac
Beef prices will be the new crawfish prices if this becomes a thing.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:05 pm to texag7
quote:
They’re are never right about anything. They predicted 3-5 major hurricanes the last few years and it has been relatively quiet.
Interestingly, the climate sims predict that warming will take place toward the poles with little to none toward the equator. That would put less contrasting energy in the system and result in milder weather.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News