- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Body map shows where men/women comfortable with touching
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:51 am
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:51 am
The sister/brother stuff is pretty weird
Blue = Female
Red = Male
LINK
Blue = Female
Red = Male
quote:
Scientists have created a body map, showing exactly where people do and don’t like to be touched.
More than 1,300 people responded to Oxford university and Finland’s Aalto university survey that asked where they were comfortable being touched and by whom.
The results, compiled into a “body map index” and published on Monday by PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in America), found men were far more comfortable with physical contact than women, with the single exception of contact with male friends.
The majority of women told researchers the only part of their body they were comfortable with male strangers touching were their hands.
In comparison, men claimed to be more at ease with a female stranger touching any part of their body, including their genitals, than a relative.
LINK
This post was edited on 10/27/15 at 11:54 am
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:53 am to TheJones
quote:
In comparison, men claimed to be more at ease with a female stranger touching any part of their body, including their genitals, than a relative
does this apply to Alabama?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:54 am to TheJones
so, males have no "taboo zone" for strangers?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:54 am to TheJones
How much did they spend to find this out? I could've told you this for much cheaper.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:56 am to TheJones
quote:
The sister/brother stuff is pretty weird
Not if you're a Bama fan, amirite?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:57 am to TheJones
Nice to know my female friends will allow me to fondle their boobs
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:58 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Not if you're a Bama fan, amirite?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:58 am to TheJones
why did they just have 1 for the partner?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:04 pm to TheJones
quote:
The majority of women told researchers the only part of their body they were comfortable with male strangers touching were their hands.
quote:
In comparison, men claimed to be more at ease with a female stranger touching any part of their body, including their genitals, than a relative.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:05 pm to TheJones
No male/red on the Uncle category
cabin....Gatlinburg....
cabin....Gatlinburg....
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:05 pm to TheJones
Was this poll performed in Alabama?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:08 pm to TheJones
So we'll let pretty much any female touch our junk
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:10 pm to TheJones
Wtf...so according to this, if your sister tugs on your junk, it's less taboo than your girl cousin.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:11 pm to TheJones
If they had just drawn boobs and dicks on the figures, this would be a lot less confusing
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:11 pm to fr33manator
quote:
“The greater the pleasure caused by touching a specific area of the body, the more selectively we allow others to touch it.”
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:12 pm to MorbidTheClown
quote:
why did they just have 1 for the partner?
Because this survey was done about normal people, the way God intended
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:15 pm to TheJones
All I see is that people are fairly comfortable getting their arse grabbed as long as its not their uncle, cousin, or stranger.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:19 pm to fr33manator
This. And the female cousin taboo zone is significantly smaller than the male taboo zone, front and back.
The study should have clarified if this was same sex cousins or not.
The study should have clarified if this was same sex cousins or not.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:52 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
Because this survey was done about normal people, the way God intended
But, they should have had responses from both males and females. I'm sure the responses would be different.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News