- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Austin toddler dies as a part of Medicaid racket, lawsuit alleges
Posted on 3/2/17 at 10:18 am to OysterPoBoy
Posted on 3/2/17 at 10:18 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Usually age 3.
Used to be. It's 1 now.
Whether that's to boost revenue or actually for the dental health of our children, who the frick knows.
0
Posted on 3/2/17 at 10:18 am to NYNolaguy1
If I had a newborn, I'd bring them in as soon as they can get the anticavity sealant on their teeth.
What they did should be considered manslaughter
What they did should be considered manslaughter
Posted on 3/2/17 at 10:19 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Usually age 3
Good to know.
Eta: or maybe not?
This post was edited on 3/2/17 at 10:21 am
Posted on 3/2/17 at 10:21 am to upgrayedd
My son is 22 months old and has all of his teeth, and I spoke to my dentist the other day and he recommends their first visit being around 24 months. At 14 months, my son had less teeth than a waffle house waitress, so (though I am not a dentist) I would see no need to take him to the dentist at that age.
Posted on 3/2/17 at 10:58 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
I would expect any parent to trust their dentist if he said the child needed work done on her teeth.
Which is exactly what these chumps count on.
Braces are the biggest racket in the world.
Posted on 3/2/17 at 10:59 am to TigerBait1971
quote:
Kill that fricker
Exactly this
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News