- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another BR Pitbull Attack
Posted on 9/9/15 at 8:52 am to lsufan112001
Posted on 9/9/15 at 8:52 am to lsufan112001
quote:
time to bust out the xylitol, that'll do the trick.
that or a bleach covered hot dog.
0
Posted on 9/9/15 at 9:15 am to Mr Harry Larrry
People should understand that it is legal in Louisiana to kill a vicious dog if it off of it's leash or outside of its containment area. Whether it's on your property or not.
The neighbors should have ended this problem years ago.
The neighbors should have ended this problem years ago.
This post was edited on 9/9/15 at 9:17 am
Posted on 9/9/15 at 9:25 am to craig8sm
pit bulls don't attack people, people attack people
Posted on 9/9/15 at 10:13 am to Mr Harry Larrry
For a dog that has attack claims against it, how do they continue to let it out and roam free? They are not very hyper vigilant about keeping neighbors safe and a part of their "family" from being hauled off to animal control.
I never let my dogs out of my fenced in yard unless on a leash or in a vehicle. They have never attacked anyone, and if they did then I would have to strongly consider putting them down for safety and liability reasons. They are a part of my family, but no dog is more important than human lives/safety when there is a documented past history.
As for the comment section at the end of the article...are the people saying that this dog did not attack anyone? Pretty crazy to claim that the people with attack photos are making this up. I bet the 19 incidents are somewhat embellished though.
I never let my dogs out of my fenced in yard unless on a leash or in a vehicle. They have never attacked anyone, and if they did then I would have to strongly consider putting them down for safety and liability reasons. They are a part of my family, but no dog is more important than human lives/safety when there is a documented past history.
As for the comment section at the end of the article...are the people saying that this dog did not attack anyone? Pretty crazy to claim that the people with attack photos are making this up. I bet the 19 incidents are somewhat embellished though.
Posted on 9/9/15 at 11:10 am to mglsu21
I am blown away to read that article. I have a friend who works with the dog owner and I have been following her battle with Animal Control. Her story was VASTLY different than what is in the article linked in the OP. Two sides to every story and all that but not sure how they are going to get past 19 prior incidents.
That being said, it is kind of screwy that they ruled the dog "dangerous" and the owners did all the required actions only to have Animal Control change their minds and come back to say they now want to kill the dog.
That being said, it is kind of screwy that they ruled the dog "dangerous" and the owners did all the required actions only to have Animal Control change their minds and come back to say they now want to kill the dog.
Posted on 9/9/15 at 11:12 am to Mr Harry Larrry
quote:
Dale Carter, who lives around the corner, said he was attacked by Jack and another small dog that also belongs to the couple in July while he was out for a walk.
these two women are clearly shitty dog owners
Posted on 9/9/15 at 11:13 am to jbgleason
quote:
, it is kind of screwy that they ruled the dog "dangerous" and the owners did all the required actions only to have Animal Control change their minds and come back to say they now want to kill the dog.
All the neighbors petitioned for it because they don't want the dog to attack them again.
Posted on 9/9/15 at 11:27 am to nes2010
I was more commenting on the fact that Animal Control only went with Dangerous the first time. If they had 19 reports it seems like they would have gone straight to vicious. I never like when the government decides something and then changes its mind and comes back over the top. If they rule and you fulfill the requirements then it seems like they are obligated, absent changing circumstances, to abide by their ruling.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News