Everyone wants to see photos of protests and violence but then they turn around and want to censor images at crime scenes and accidents.

It's a double standard.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Konkey Dong

Member since Aug 2013

2164 posts

Posted on 2/27/17 at 1:44 pm to Hammertime

Wife works for the advocate, your assessment about him is wrong. He couldn't see the knuckles coming, so he didn't have time to check them.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Jim Rockford

Member since May 2011

98188 posts

Posted on 2/27/17 at 2:01 pm to Konkey Dong

If this guy had censored himself, we'd never have photographic proof of Sasquatch.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Jcorye1

Tom Brady = GoAT

Member since Dec 2007

71411 posts

Posted on 2/27/17 at 2:34 pm to Pico de Gallo

If there were already first responders at the scene, he's got a job to do. He did the first thing correct, don't be that fricking moron who gets in the way of trained first responders.

I promise every single one of those Facebook commentators have read articles (ergo giving ad hits) to disaster articles showing in the moment pictures. It's hypocritical.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by NOLApurpleandgold

baton rouge

Member since Jul 2016

1236 posts

Posted on 2/27/17 at 4:13 pm to LuckySo-n-So

quote:
He says he chased the buzzard away after taking the photo.

Awww...how very compassionate of him. Truth is, photogs love blood and guts and they don't give two shits who's bleeding or why or what or how. They think they're heroes for doing nothing more than snapping a photo.
How 'bout making sure people around you were ok, then photographing the rescue/recovery? Too much to ask from these leeches. How would they feel if their wife/child/friend was just hit by a speeding drunk driver and instead of helping everybody asked him "how do you feel, sir"
Guarantee you the photog would not respond kindly. But somehow they are immune from criticism or question. They are not above reproach.
My God,show some class, professionalism and human decency.

Page 1 2 3