- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Zach Cunningham > Reuben Foster?
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:29 am
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:29 am
Keep in mind Cunningham was not playing behind a Bama front 4....
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 2/28/17 at 8:31 am
18
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:36 am to ChaChingBoyd
I would take Cunningham over him.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:55 am to ChaChingBoyd
Not buying it.
Cunningham's skill doesn't outweigh Foster's skill + violence.
In my opinion, Cunningham plays a little light in the seat. Foster is a prodigious hard-hitter.
I know that hitting hard isn't everything. What I'm saying is that I think their skills are roughly equal, and there is a gap between how violent Foster is and how violent Cunningham is.
The Saints are a soft team. They need more people who can bring the wood on both sides of the ball. Foster is the pick if both are on the board.
Cunningham's skill doesn't outweigh Foster's skill + violence.
In my opinion, Cunningham plays a little light in the seat. Foster is a prodigious hard-hitter.
I know that hitting hard isn't everything. What I'm saying is that I think their skills are roughly equal, and there is a gap between how violent Foster is and how violent Cunningham is.
The Saints are a soft team. They need more people who can bring the wood on both sides of the ball. Foster is the pick if both are on the board.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 9:06 am to ChaChingBoyd
I see them as both really good players, but different. Cunningham is like a Sam Mills (not size wise) where he diagnosis and gets in on the play. Foster seems more like a Vaughn Johnson, a big violent player who blows things up.
I wouldn't be upset with either.
I wouldn't be upset with either.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 9:07 am to SpqrTiger
quote:
In my opinion, Cunningham plays a little light in the seat. Foster is a prodigious hard-hitter.
I know that hitting hard isn't everything. What I'm saying is that I think their skills are roughly equal, and there is a gap between how violent Foster is and how violent Cunningham is.
The Saints are a soft team. They need more people who can bring the wood on both sides of the ball. Foster is the pick if both are on the board.
A rangy smart athlete > a retarded hard hitting speedster.
Foster isnt a playmaker. He just has the occasional big hit. How many strips/picks did he have at Bama?
Posted on 2/28/17 at 9:13 am to ChaChingBoyd
If Cunningham and Foster are both there at 11, and we like Cunningham, we need to trade down.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 9:19 am to ChaChingBoyd
If the same people who evaluated Anthony at ILB are evaluating the same position for us this year I will pass on both and take a DE.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 9:28 am to ChaChingBoyd
Foster doesn't seem visceral enough to be making calls in the NFL as a MLB, especially in in a 4-3.
Cunningham has a lower ceiling but low-bust potential.
Cunningham has a lower ceiling but low-bust potential.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 9:57 am to ChaChingBoyd
Some mocks have cunnigham available in the second. Probabaly a pipe dream but that would be amazing with a DE in the first.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 10:00 am to TigahJay
I would totally take Cunningham in the 2nd instead of spending the #11 pick on Foster. Go D-Line Saints!
Posted on 2/28/17 at 11:37 am to ChaChingBoyd
Foster more Athletic
Cunningham higher IQ
I want ZC IMO
Cunningham higher IQ
I want ZC IMO
Posted on 2/28/17 at 1:50 pm to ChaChingBoyd
I'm certain zach is going to be a several pro bowl kind of guy if healthy.
Not sold on Bama boy. So hard to evaluate them.
Not sold on Bama boy. So hard to evaluate them.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 1:55 pm to ChaChingBoyd
Cunningham graded well for PFF but... I just see WAY too many arm tackles in his film.
Reuben Foster is a much more violent tackler, which presents its own concerns but, has better form than Cunningham
There's an issue with nearly every ILB in this class
I really like Alex Anzalone as a value pick in the 4th.. Again, he's really risky
Reuben Foster is a much more violent tackler, which presents its own concerns but, has better form than Cunningham
There's an issue with nearly every ILB in this class
I really like Alex Anzalone as a value pick in the 4th.. Again, he's really risky
Posted on 2/28/17 at 1:59 pm to OKtiger
We can not afford to risk the MLB pick with Anzalone....We need to address the position in FA or use 1st or at least 2nd pick.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 2:12 pm to ChaChingBoyd
quote:
We can not afford to risk the MLB pick with Anzalone....We need to address the position in FA or use 1st or at least 2nd pick.
I like 2nd pick then
There's just too much 1st round talent with this year's pass rushers to reach for a MLB
Posted on 2/28/17 at 2:15 pm to OKtiger
Reuben Foster is Stephone Anthony 2.0 waiting to happen. Zach Cunningham is the next Kuechly
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 2/28/17 at 2:20 pm to breauxmosexual
Anything to back up your bold statements?
Posted on 2/28/17 at 2:32 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
Anything to back up your bold statements?
Yea, Steph was a beast at Clemson and killed it at the combine. He's proven to be a dead head.
Foster is already rumored to be retarded and was also an absolute animal at Bama and will destroy some numbers at the combine.
Happy?
Posted on 2/28/17 at 2:33 pm to BUGAtGOAT
Anthony lacks football instincts, never been said about Reuben-
Posted on 2/28/17 at 2:46 pm to ChaChingBoyd
It doesn't matter.... Whoever we pass on will be an elite 12 time pro bowler and future HOF. The guy we pick will be a bust
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News