Started By
Message
locked post

Why do so many want Hicks as NT?

Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:28 pm
Posted by tigertown79
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2007
435 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:28 pm
Why do so many people want an explosive player like Hicks as NT where he will constantly be double teamed and hard for him to make plays. He will be better at DE as a 4 technique and be used like a Haloti Ngata for the Ravens where he can be more disruptive?
A 3-4 NT is a straight-up 0-tech type of guy - sit over the center and take up space. It's the NT's job to force double-teams, making his job less gap pursuit (beating blocks) and more gap control (acting like a blob).. It sounds simple, but the NT also needs to be good enough with his technique to continue to force double-teams regardless of the play. If the NT is doing his job, that should free up the linebackers to either pursue through a potentially open gap (left open as a result of the NT absorbing a bunch of beef) or through pursuit of other gaps (since they don't have to worry about the gaps the NT is occupying).
This post was edited on 1/25/13 at 12:29 pm
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:33 pm to
I want him in the DE rotation.
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:33 pm to
It's not that I want him there it's just that we don't have many other options after Bunkley
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32950 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Why do so many want Hicks as NT?


Hicks is a better 3-4 DE than a NT. That role should actually fit him well.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

It's not that I want him there it's just that we don't have many other options after Bunkley


I agree with this. Who else will rotate with bunkley?
Posted by tigertown79
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2007
435 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:48 pm to
Draft a NT builds depth and you can go and sign another NT that can provide more depth. . All you really need is around 3 NT's on a 3-4 defense team
Posted by HMTVBrian2
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
5760 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:51 pm to
Hicks has the size and athletic ability to be a player similar to Richard Seymour..who was a fantastic 3-4 end in New England, when he was healthy.
Posted by mm2316
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Aug 2010
6942 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Who else will rotate with bunkley?


This post was edited on 1/25/13 at 12:53 pm
Posted by afatgreekcat
Atlanta, GA
Member since Jan 2013
2828 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 12:54 pm to
who is that?
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:06 pm to
Isn't Hicks at 325? I know size isn't just a determinant but its not like he would be undersized for the position. I'm of the opinion that I do not want our first pick to be anything but pass rusher. Now if we could get say Jesse Williams by trading back up into the second, I'd do that in a heartbeat.
Having a Williams would allow Hicks to be a DE in this scheme.
But like others said, we don't have anyone on the current roster you could spell Bunkley with at that NT spot besides Hicks
This post was edited on 1/25/13 at 1:07 pm
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64288 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:07 pm to
I don't see him at NT either.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115597 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

who is that?




Walter Thomas.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:11 pm to
I'm thinking the same thing... put him at DE, then we have him and Jordan on either side.

then we can ditch Smith with no real issue between Jordan, Hicks, and Gallete.. at least two of them are good enough to start in a 3-4
Posted by Puddinhead
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2003
4299 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:12 pm to
No way Gallete would be a DE in a 3-4.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Isn't Hicks at 325? I know size isn't just a determinant but its not like he would be undersized for the position.
yeah but he's 6-5 so he's got a higher center of gravity than a 6-1 or 6-2 305 lber
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:13 pm to
quote:


No way Gallete would be a DE in a 3-4.

I was thinking him as an OLB would be a possibility too. I'm just more concerned with dropping Smith
Posted by SJS Eagle 85
P-Town
Member since Apr 2009
5007 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

I want him in the DE rotation.
First thing to came to mind when I started filling in the line spots in my head.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33734 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:16 pm to
You would think Hicks would play DE.

The question I have is who will play at NT on passing downs? Bunkley has always been primarily a run stuffer.

Maybe we see Hicks slide down to the middle on obvious passing downs
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64288 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:47 pm to
Could see Hicks some at DE possibly but NT seems a stretch for him right now.
Whole dang team is in flux
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32950 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

No way Gallete would be a DE in a 3-4.


He'd be an OLB in a 3-4. I think he'd fit in well there.

It would have to be Jordan and Hicks at DE. Bunkley at NT. Wilson & Gallette at OLB. Will Smith on another team.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram