Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

What the Eagles offered...

Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:31 pm
Posted by BayouBengal0505
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2013
2686 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:31 pm
Horrible

Looks like we did pretty well with the trade.. seems like the 18th pick and other offers were smokescreen. Everyone bitching about the trade should feel good after this article.
This post was edited on 3/11/17 at 7:32 pm
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75855 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:32 pm to
Obligatory frick the Eagles.
Posted by moock blackjack
Member since Apr 2008
96190 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:34 pm to
Really don't believe this!!
Posted by BayouBengal0505
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2013
2686 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:36 pm to
I dont think we understood that alot of the offers we "heard" about were smokescreen and prob generated from our camp. Think we did well and all you bitches should stop whining...
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72619 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Per a source with knowledge of the situation,


Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
89844 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:39 pm to
Wut!

a source with knowledge of the situation, the Eagles offered safety Malcolm Jenkins, a third-round pick, and a fourth-round pick for Cooks. The Saints wanted a second-round pick plus Jenkins
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
12326 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:58 pm to
The last thing I want is to get Malcolm Jenkins back.
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
89844 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 8:00 pm to
I know LOL, trade FOR Jenkins. frick that shite. Hah
Posted by Vlatket
Member since Oct 2016
7475 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 8:04 pm to
Malcolm Jenkins
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23600 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

The Saints wanted a second-round pick plus Jenkins

but why? are they thinking about life without Vaccarro? not sure why they feel the need for another safety.... Bell and Vaccarro are a solid duo.... and Banjo is actually a pretty decent backup... so why even entertain the idea of giving up a young, 1000 yd. receiver for an old S and a 2nd rounder?
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30005 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 8:33 pm to
don't think they would want Jenkins back at this point in his career even if it was as a FA much less give up anything to get him back


Posted by Lilpickles
Member since Nov 2016
1701 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 8:34 pm to
No retreads
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram