- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What happened on the blocked kick?
Posted on 9/19/16 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 4:32 pm
This has been a problem for 2 years now at least. It cost us the Titans game last year.
Looked like Peat had a guy in each gap and the long snapper took forever to get his head up. He didn't even chip the defender on his right, and Peat got blown up from his right.
Is Peat's responsibility both gaps on that play?
The ball wasn't even close to getting up.
I saw another team kicking in the afternoon who's kicker approaches the ball right after the snap. I guess we can't expect that kind of forward thinking.
Looked like Peat had a guy in each gap and the long snapper took forever to get his head up. He didn't even chip the defender on his right, and Peat got blown up from his right.
Is Peat's responsibility both gaps on that play?
The ball wasn't even close to getting up.
I saw another team kicking in the afternoon who's kicker approaches the ball right after the snap. I guess we can't expect that kind of forward thinking.
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 4:35 pm to TigerBait1127
Line did not block very well, but the kicker has got to get the ball up higher than that. He did the same thing last week.
The kicker should approached the ball pretty much as soon as it is snapped. By the time you get to the ball the holder should have it down and ready to go.
The kicker should approached the ball pretty much as soon as it is snapped. By the time you get to the ball the holder should have it down and ready to go.
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 4:38 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 4:36 pm to tigersint
quote:
but the kicker has got to get the ball up higher than that.
I was drinking pretty heavily, but I didn't remember the height of the kick being an issue on it.
I'll take another gander this afternoon.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 4:42 pm to TigerBait1127
I did not realy get too good of a look at the kick either, but it did look a little bit low to me from the replay.
Last week in the dome he had one that we pretty low, so i kind of just assumed that the same thing happened again
Last week in the dome he had one that we pretty low, so i kind of just assumed that the same thing happened again
Posted on 9/19/16 at 4:45 pm to TigerBait1127
Mike Detillier and Bobby Hebert are saying it was Teron Armstead's guy and when a blocker comes through like that the kicker can't do anything about it
Posted on 9/19/16 at 4:52 pm to TigerBait1127
It looked to me like the kick was a little low, but it wouldn't have mattered. He would've had to kick that thing nearly straight up in the air the guy was deep in the backfield.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 4:54 pm to TigerBait1127
thought I read it was a missed assignment but something the Giants saw in film and could exploit.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 4:56 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Payton said the Saints weren't good at right guard or right tackle on the blocked FG. Peat was RG, Armstead RT on the play.
— Josh Katzenstein (@jkatzenstein) September 19, 2016
Posted on 9/19/16 at 5:00 pm to burdman
That's what I thought when I first saw it, the kicker can't do much when the defender is 4 yards in the backfield.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 5:49 pm to burdman
quote:
It looked to me like the kick was a little low, but it wouldn't have mattered. He would've had to kick that thing nearly straight up in the air the guy was deep in the backfield.
This. I watched the GIF like 8 times today and I'm pretty sure it woulda been blocked no matter where he kicked it. The blockers failed. Bottom line.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 5:49 pm to Sinister1
quote:
Mike Detillier and Bobby Hebert are saying it was Teron Armstead's guy and when a blocker comes through like that the kicker can't do anything about it
Not possible. So many people here told me that it was definitely a low kick and that was the problem.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 5:50 pm to TigerBait1127
McMahon still has a job. That's what happened.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 5:53 pm to Breesus
F McMahon. F vitt. F Johnson. Oh and f Payton.
There I said it.
There I said it.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 5:57 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
F McMahon. F vitt. F Johnson. Oh and f Payton.
There I said it.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 5:57 pm to TigerBait1127
Regardless I still think Lutz is our guy. Besides the block kicked and the missed 61 yarder, he looks confident and has a hell of a leg.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 5:59 pm to LSUZombie
And the missed 50 yarder and the blocked kick that somehow went in
Posted on 9/19/16 at 6:00 pm to Breesus
quote:
McMahon still has a job. That's what happened.
This is the correct answer
Posted on 9/19/16 at 6:00 pm to D011ahbi11
quote:
the blocked kick that somehow went in
Kid has a hell of a leg
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News