- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WBRZ-Footage shows crash that led to Will Smith's death (Hayes hitting Smith)
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:01 am
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:01 am
4
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:05 am to whodatdude
BOOM
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:06 am to whodatdude
We had that video over the weekend. Why is there a boom? 
It was already a fact the vehicles hit each other
It was already a fact the vehicles hit each otherThis post was edited on 4/19/16 at 9:07 am
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:46 am to lsupride87
I hadn't seen this video until now. I think you can tell a few things from the video.
The hit was not violent. But, it looks intentional based on the delay before between Smith applying the brakes and Hayes.
The hit was not violent. But, it looks intentional based on the delay before between Smith applying the brakes and Hayes.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:47 am to whodatdude
Check the other threads, we don't need a new thread every time something new happens (especially when the news is almost a week old)
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:48 am to moneyg
quote:
The hit was not violent.
I'd really love to now how you can come to that conclusion since the hit is basically in a completely dark area of the screen and incredibly low resolution.
quote:
But, it looks intentional based on the delay before between Smith applying the brakes and Hayes.
This is agree with to a point. Although, keep in mind that they did slow the video down just before the impact, so it may not be as bad as it seems in the video.
ETA: Looks to be roughly 3 seconds real time, that's a pretty delayed reaction.
This post was edited on 4/19/16 at 9:51 am
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:53 am to LNCHBOX
G
E
R
M
A
N
Ssssssssssssss
E
R
M
A
N
Ssssssssssssss
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:06 am to Weekend Warrior79
Sorry. I guess I should have sorted through a 25 page thread to see if someone might have posted the video...
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:06 am to ScumpyWumpy
quote:
G
E
R
M
A
N
Ssssssssssssss
Holy shite. What a funny and original response. You're a regular Dane Cook.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:07 am to ScumpyWumpy
So. Damn. Witty.
You really got me there, bud. I guess I should go hide in a corner now, so as to not draw your scorn any further.
You really got me there, bud. I guess I should go hide in a corner now, so as to not draw your scorn any further.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:36 am to whodatdude
One thing from that vid that I thought was interesting is how fricking fast Hayes pops out of that Hummer after hitting Smith.
ETA: you can also see the Mercedes being propelled forward quite a bit by the impact.
ETA: you can also see the Mercedes being propelled forward quite a bit by the impact.
This post was edited on 4/19/16 at 10:40 am
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:51 am to Vacherie Saint
looks deliberate and yeah he was after the driver of that car (Smith). he got out extremely fast. just not a good idea to take the law into your own hands.
This post was edited on 4/19/16 at 10:52 am
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:06 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I'd really love to now how you can come to that conclusion
...by watching the video.
The term "violent" is relative. I'm not going to argue your definition vs. mine. What I'm saying is that, IMO, on a scale of 1-10 of rear end collisions, this would be a 3. The original accident was a 1.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:11 am to moneyg
quote:
by watching the video.
Thew video where you can't even see anything when the contact happens? The video where they slowed down the impact?
I'm just amazed that all the people that were all about no speculation a week ago have changed their tunes.
quote:
The term "violent" is relative. I'm not going to argue your definition vs. mine.
That's fine, but don't tell me there is anything clear in that video to bring you to that conclusion.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:12 am to beauchristopher
quote:
he got out extremely fast.
With a gun in hand. Dude was intent on violence.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:33 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Thew video where you can't even see anything when the contact happens? The video where they slowed down the impact?
the linked video. As I mentioned in my post, I think it's clear enough to determine a couple of things.
quote:
I'm just amazed that all the people that were all about no speculation a week ago have changed their tunes.
quote:
That's fine, but don't tell me there is anything clear in that video to bring you to that conclusion.
...says the guy who adamantly and continuously declared that the Hayes vehicle had no reason to stop when it did before it was rear ended. You said that video was conclusive. You were wrong...very wrong...embarrassingly wrong.
quote:
don't tell me there is anything clear in that video to bring you to that conclusion.
I think your confusion is that you don't understand how to interpret these videos. You've been wrong consistently. This is just another example of that. And, because of your embarrassment, you think no information can be gathered. That's just ridiculous.
A rational person (you are not one) can watch that video and have an opinion on the accident. I'm not saying that it answers every question. But, before seeing the video, I had no idea how hard the vehicles hit. I had no idea if Hayes was just chasing Smith and then Smith slammed on the brakes forcing the accident. I had no idea of Hayes had hit Smith extremely hard with the intent to injure.
Now I know.
This post was edited on 4/19/16 at 11:36 am
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:40 am to moneyg
quote:
What I'm saying is that, IMO, on a scale of 1-10 of rear end collisions, this would be a 3. The original accident was a 1.
I disagree. The original accident didn't appear to cause any damage to either vehicle. I vote it a .5. If it has to be a whole number, I'll give it a 1.
However, I'll give accident #2 a higher number, a 4 or 5, considering 4 surfaces of 3 vehicles were damaged and the rear window of Smith's SUV was blown out on impact.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:47 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Holy shite. What a funny and original response. You're a regular Dane Cook.
I see what you did there. You referenced his not funny response to a not funny "comedian." I approve
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:49 am to ScumpyWumpy
quote:
G
E
R
M
A
N
Ssssssssssssss
That's a hell of a second post. I foresee much future success for you on these boards
Posted on 4/19/16 at 12:16 pm to beauchristopher
quote:
looks deliberate and yeah he was after the driver of that car (Smith). he got out extremely fast. just not a good idea to take the law into your own hands.
from what I can tell smith got out first. hayes didnt have any light colored clothing on.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News