- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trading 13
Posted on 3/11/15 at 9:52 am
Posted on 3/11/15 at 9:52 am
Say we make a trade move back and collect another second or third rounder. Would you guys be opposed to this?
6
Posted on 3/11/15 at 9:53 am to fightingtigers98
Depends on who is available, but no. I'd be fine with it.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 9:56 am to Fun Bunch
I don't have the chart.. What would we get in exchange for our pick?
Posted on 3/11/15 at 9:58 am to fightingtigers98
quote:
Say we make a trade move back and collect another second or third rounder. Would you guys be opposed to this?
Hell no. If you can somehow manage to procure another first-round pick from 24-32 then you even further improve your chances of remodeling the defense.
I think Dupree and McKinney will both still be available in the late first round. They could probably have their choice of one or both (I honestly think we really need to upgrade thoroughly at linebacker).
Then you can use the hypothetical third selection as a value pick. Take the best available option among the remaining interior offensive lineman and defensive backs.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 9:59 am to fightingtigers98
If we can trade back to say 20 and pick up another 2nd rounder I'd be all for it. That'd give us 4 picks in the top 64.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:00 am to fightingtigers98
Can't give a true answer without the board. If one of the elite pass rushers/o-linemen are there then i'd rather stay put.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:01 am to saint amant steve
would love for Mariota to fall and the eagles mortage off the draft to us
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:02 am to fightingtigers98
I have a know. Its happening.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:03 am to 68wDoc68w
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:03 am to 68wDoc68w
Yeah this, if one of those highly coveted players, Mariota or Cooper looks like they might make it to 13 we could get a frick load of picks to trade back 
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:06 am to Laaz2750
quote:
Mariota or Cooper looks like they might make it to 13 we could get a frick load of picks to trade back
Id love it.
we don't need cooper so if fell id to have someone jump up and give their first and 3rd
This post was edited on 3/11/15 at 10:07 am
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:08 am to 68wDoc68w
Right, I don't remember who it was now, but how would you have liked to have been the team that got what Atlanta gave up to grab Jones?
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:12 am to Laaz2750
Say we trade back and get 21 and 53
21- Markus Golden OLB
31- Eric kendricks ILB
44- Jaelen strong WR
53- Laken Tomlinson G
21- Markus Golden OLB
31- Eric kendricks ILB
44- Jaelen strong WR
53- Laken Tomlinson G
This post was edited on 3/11/15 at 10:14 am
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:13 am to 68wDoc68w
I don't see the saints trading back. If history proves anything, we move up.
This post was edited on 3/11/15 at 10:14 am
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:14 am to Brageous
If history proves anything we wouldn't have traded graham.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:15 am to Brageous
quote:
I don't see the saints trading back. If anything, history proves anything, we move up.
Yeah I was thinkin maybe we use 13 & 31 to jump into the Fowler/Shelton sweepstakes. Don't think i could complain about that. Both players have the "sure thing" feel to them.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:54 am to HollierThanThou
I said this yesterday and Lester had a good counter point... Normally you don't trade for a low first round pick so you can move up in the draft. Not saying they won't but there are easier ways to move up in the draft that don't include giving up a guaranteed producer in an effort to move up and get someone who MAY produce in the future.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 11:37 am to fightingtigers98
If the elite pass rushers are gone I would be more than okay with moving back 5-10 slots and taking an OL. Then use 31 and the 2nd rounders on a big WR and 2 front 7 guys.
Actually I'd be more than okay with that, it almost sounds ideal.
Actually I'd be more than okay with that, it almost sounds ideal.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 11:40 am to Laaz2750
We didn't trade for picks. We traded for a sure fire starting center and a 1st.
So we filled one of out biggest needs in the trade as well as receiving the 31st pick.
So we filled one of out biggest needs in the trade as well as receiving the 31st pick.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 12:19 pm to HollierThanThou
I'd be cool with going the Patriots route this year. Say we trade with Philly. Give up #13 for #20 and #52
#20- La'el Collins (LSU)
#31- Eli Harold (UVA)
#44- Bernardrick McKinney (MSU)
#52- Devin Funchess (Mich)
#20- La'el Collins (LSU)
#31- Eli Harold (UVA)
#44- Bernardrick McKinney (MSU)
#52- Devin Funchess (Mich)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News