Started By
Message

re: Saints-Vikings Comparison

Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:24 am to
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:24 am to
quote:

ok let me try your way of making an argument




take that



you really dont have anything do you?
Posted by LSUSoulja08
Member since Oct 2007
16969 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:24 am to
quote:

here is what i have seen so far from saints talk to prove the saints are better:


okay. what have you shown to prove that the vikes are better?

dumbass
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141796 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:25 am to
quote:

like i've said before i would rather have a loss becuase there is too much pressure on trying to go 16-0 and there is no reward for achieving that



Aside from home field advantage you fricking homer moron
Posted by thedice20
Member since May 1926
Member since Aug 2008
7550 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:25 am to
Why does flowbie get on here and try his damnest to try to spoil our success..

He was probablu raped by a weird uncle...
Dude stay gay and go kill your self
Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:26 am to
quote:

you all assume that you would win this game by 50 points or some shite


WHEN THE HELL DID ANYBODY SAY THIS?!?!?!?

Seriously, kid, how old are you? You seem to have the common sense and arguing skills of a drunk 14 year old on Aderall. For that matter, why are you even here? Do you crave attention, conflict, or are you just upset because your boyfriend dumped you for Percy Harvin?
Posted by hi2ulol
Member since Sep 2009
1268 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:26 am to
quote:

please stop calling me a homer it's pretty hypocritical of you. you all assume that you would win this game by 50 points or some shite. give me a break


that wouldn't be a stretch with the saints offense, scored our game average tonight with 38, but i have to admit, i didn't expect to do that to a belicheck defense

ok i didn't see win by i thought you said score 50 points, i doubt many people thought we'd win by 50
This post was edited on 12/1/09 at 12:28 am
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:27 am to
Flowbie do this for me

1st, Look at the point differential in the Saints 11 wins

2nd, Do the same with the Vikes 10 wins

3rd, Look at the Saints opponents winning%

4th, Do the same with the Vikes' schedule

What is more impressive to you?

Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34896 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:29 am to
I'm still waiting on his explanation for how the Vikings running game (backs and O-line) is so much better even though we're ahead of them in the rankings in the running department.


I'll wait.
Posted by Flowbie
Minnesota
Member since Sep 2009
869 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:29 am to
a dominant running back, a hall of fame quarterback playing better than he has his entire (hall of fame) career, a great receiving corps, dominant d-line(leads the league in sacks. if you think brees is going to have all day to throw like he did tonight than )

laurence maroney was running all over you in the first half, and he's not even good. and it doesnt matter what his final stats were for the game because they were in catch up mode all game

your run defense has been exposed by mediocre teams and theres no reason we wouldnt do the same
Posted by Flowbie
Minnesota
Member since Sep 2009
869 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:30 am to
quote:

ok i didn't see win by i thought you said score 50 points, i doubt many people thought we'd win by 50


learn 2 read you illiterate frick
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:30 am to
He comes on a saints board and claims we dont bring up any valid arguments besides record.

Yet, he strays away when we bring out cold hard facts.

He knows what's up and it's eating at him.

why else would he have started this thread
Posted by DestrehanTiger
Houston, TX by way of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
12467 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:31 am to
quote:

a dominant running back, a hall of fame quarterback playing better than he has his entire (hall of fame) career, a great receiving corps, dominant d-line


I agree with a lot of this except for the word great to describe the receiving corps. You used that word pretty liberally.
Posted by Flowbie
Minnesota
Member since Sep 2009
869 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:31 am to
quote:

Yet, he strays away when we bring out cold hard facts


what cold hard facts?
Posted by Flowbie
Minnesota
Member since Sep 2009
869 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:32 am to
apparently the vikings don't have a great receiving corps even though espn analysts say they do, troy aikman said they do, nfl network analysts say they do

but what do i know i'm just a homer
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:32 am to
go up to my last posts and do what I told you boy.
Posted by thedice20
Member since May 1926
Member since Aug 2008
7550 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:32 am to
quote:

what cold hard facts?




you predicted the saints to get stomped by the pats...... homo
Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:32 am to
I say treat him like a Jehova's witness. Ignore him and he'll go away.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84766 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:33 am to
Lets base it on statistics.... Brees is better than Farve in Passer Rating, TDs, Yards, and Wins.

Saints Rushing Offense 154 yds/game 18 TDs. Minn 129 yds/ game and 13 TDs. Hmmmmm....

Saints receiving leads Minnesota in Yds/game and TDs as well.

So we run the ball and pass the ball better than the Vikes, yet the Vikes have a better OL?? Makes no sense. We are better in every offensive category.

On defense....Saints have 31 takeaways, Vikes have 16. Saints 20 pics to 9 for the Vikes. Vikes allowing 18.5 pts/game and the Saints allow 19/game. 303 to 330 yds/game edge to the Vikes...

Saints offense >>>>>> Vikes Offense

Saints Defense <> Vikes Defense

Saints 38-20
This post was edited on 12/1/09 at 12:40 am
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:33 am to
quote:

apparently the vikings don't have a great receiving corps even though espn analysts say they do, troy aikman said they do, nfl network analysts say they do



and pretty much all of ESPN analysts are saying Saints have best chance to win Super Bowl...what's your point?
Posted by hi2ulol
Member since Sep 2009
1268 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:33 am to
quote:

learn 2 read you illiterate frick


I corrected my mistake, ok moron?

learn 2 not be a dick
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram