- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Player suspensions
Posted on 3/24/12 at 1:11 am to Breesus
Posted on 3/24/12 at 1:11 am to Breesus
getting Bunkley on th D-line took care of a need. Don't know much about Chamberlain from the Rams but he is familiar with what Spags wants to do on defense. Looks like we'll have to draft some secondary help. Haven't been looking at the prospects at the safety position for this year's draft. Up until a few weeks ago, I was only looking at DL,LB,OG,and WR.
This post was edited on 3/24/12 at 8:54 am
Posted on 3/24/12 at 1:13 am to Breesus
Smith and Vilma being on the top of the hierarchy so to say will be penalized a hefty amount, Vilma the most due to all the allegations. Harper will be right up there with them all since he was GGG's poster child for laying the wood, all his big hits and penalties/fines you have to know he was endorsing the bounty system fully.
I just hope that Jenkins being so new to the defense at the time wasn't a part of it, and since Greer isn't a hitter wasn't involved. That said will these guys get penalized for their involvement in the reward/pay for interceptions, TD's, sacks etc? If so all named thus far could be suspended since even someone like Greer who doesn't look for big hits but Int's/TD's would be involved I would think.
I just hope that Jenkins being so new to the defense at the time wasn't a part of it, and since Greer isn't a hitter wasn't involved. That said will these guys get penalized for their involvement in the reward/pay for interceptions, TD's, sacks etc? If so all named thus far could be suspended since even someone like Greer who doesn't look for big hits but Int's/TD's would be involved I would think.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 1:16 am to ATLienTiger
Smith and Vilma being suspended does not concern me nearly as much as a saftey or CB. Harper would be one thing. Jenkins is devastating IMO
This post was edited on 3/24/12 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 3/24/12 at 1:52 am to Breesus
Exactly, we dealt without both Smith and Vilma, but losing our best corner and a Safety who has so many responsibilities would be devastating.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 2:08 am to ATLienTiger
Well are they just going to let porter skate? Im sure he got a big check for that int against manning. If they going to dish out suspensions they need to be fricking fair. But this arse hat will never do that.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 2:10 am to dgnx6
who knows, Porter is still denying bounties existed to this day.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 8:44 am to ATLienTiger
quote:
who knows, Porter is still denying bounties existed to this day.
Not on our team, who cares.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 10:54 am to Breesus
We will be able to stagger the suspensions.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 11:28 am to MinnesotaTiger
Losing Greer or Jenkins would be devastating.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 11:46 am to Hoodoo Man
ehh..I wonder if that "fight" with Jenkins and Steve Smith from last year will come into talks.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 12:32 pm to Hoodoo Man
We are in agreement:
quote:
Breesus: Jenkins is devastating IMO
quote:
ATLienTiger: but losing our best corner and a Safety who has so many responsibilities would be devastating.
quote:
Hoodoo Man: Losing Greer or Jenkins would be devastating.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 4:40 pm to Breesus
just don't forget about this guy he will be a factor...42
Abdul-Quddus , Isa
Safety
he played very well.....
Abdul-Quddus , Isa
Safety
he played very well.....
Posted on 3/24/12 at 5:14 pm to Tigercowboy
quote:
Shanle: Nothing he never hit anyone and having him on the field is a punishment.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 6:31 pm to Tigercowboy
quote:
Vilma: 8 weeks or the season.
Trade him or get rid of him - too much money against the cap and too much negative attention. Give the job to Dunbar
Posted on 3/24/12 at 6:33 pm to LooseCannon22282
quote:
Bobby McCray would be the only D-lineman who you would think would be suspended
Because of the clean hit he laid on Kert Warner that ESPN keeps showing as so violent and misbehaved
Posted on 3/24/12 at 10:31 pm to Bayou
I think Goodell's gonna hammer Will Smith. Doesn't matter so much what he may have actually done.
Remember, they were after him for the StarCaps thing. I get the sense that Roger's a vindictive little cuss, and this will be the chance for him to tack on a few extra games, just for spite.
Remember, they were after him for the StarCaps thing. I get the sense that Roger's a vindictive little cuss, and this will be the chance for him to tack on a few extra games, just for spite.
Posted on 3/24/12 at 11:35 pm to Bayou
I was talking about the hit where he laid Favre out on a reverse that the Vikings ran. He got fined for that.
I never said anything about that awesome hit on Warner being dirty. Crazy bastard
I never said anything about that awesome hit on Warner being dirty. Crazy bastard
This post was edited on 3/24/12 at 11:47 pm
Posted on 3/25/12 at 5:08 pm to s_i5
I thought the same at first, but the more I think about it, I doubt there are going to be many suspensions at all.
I do think Vilma will get hit because he's been specifically implicated for the bounty on Favre, but I won't be the whole season or 8 games. I'm thinking more like 4-6 games.
There is a reason that Goodell didn't involve the NFLPA in this whole investigation process. Wouldn't you think Goodell would want their input on an issue he claims is about player safety??
He didn't include them because he knew the union would not have backed such harsh sanctions because so many of the members are involved in similar systems on other teams, or at least know the real motivation was not to injure, but merely promote aggressive play.
If Goodell slams Vilma the way he did Payton, he will have the entire union coming out and defending Vilma and attacking the investigation throughout a lengthy appeal process.
Goodell doesn't want that kind of backlash.
That's why he hammered Payton right off the bat and is waiting for the player suspensions. He wanted to keep the players quiet out of fear of suspension while the media pushes his "player safety" agenda without a response by players.
He knew that with Payton, he can get his point across and doesn't have to fight a union, but just pick off a lone target.
The lack of or very minor player suspensions that will come out will just go to show what a pussy Goodell was in this whole situation and show that it truly wasn't about player safety.
The player suspensions will not be announced until the week leading up to the draft, once the interest in the story has died down and so that they will quickly be brushed aside for draft coverage.
Vilma will be the one serious hit, and it will likely be 4-6 games because Goodell will hope that will be acceptable in light of Payton's suspension and may not even be appealed. Vilma will probably apply for a reduction which will be granted after 3 weeks or so.
IMO FWIW FTW
I do think Vilma will get hit because he's been specifically implicated for the bounty on Favre, but I won't be the whole season or 8 games. I'm thinking more like 4-6 games.
There is a reason that Goodell didn't involve the NFLPA in this whole investigation process. Wouldn't you think Goodell would want their input on an issue he claims is about player safety??
He didn't include them because he knew the union would not have backed such harsh sanctions because so many of the members are involved in similar systems on other teams, or at least know the real motivation was not to injure, but merely promote aggressive play.
If Goodell slams Vilma the way he did Payton, he will have the entire union coming out and defending Vilma and attacking the investigation throughout a lengthy appeal process.
Goodell doesn't want that kind of backlash.
That's why he hammered Payton right off the bat and is waiting for the player suspensions. He wanted to keep the players quiet out of fear of suspension while the media pushes his "player safety" agenda without a response by players.
He knew that with Payton, he can get his point across and doesn't have to fight a union, but just pick off a lone target.
The lack of or very minor player suspensions that will come out will just go to show what a pussy Goodell was in this whole situation and show that it truly wasn't about player safety.
The player suspensions will not be announced until the week leading up to the draft, once the interest in the story has died down and so that they will quickly be brushed aside for draft coverage.
Vilma will be the one serious hit, and it will likely be 4-6 games because Goodell will hope that will be acceptable in light of Payton's suspension and may not even be appealed. Vilma will probably apply for a reduction which will be granted after 3 weeks or so.
IMO FWIW FTW
Posted on 3/25/12 at 6:17 pm to s_i5
Defense need to be overhauled anyway, cut the ones that get suspended and sign someone through draft of FA to take their place.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 6:21 pm to LooseCannon22282
I'm a homer but UL cornerback Dwight Bentley may be available around the third round. I think that would be a good pick if we're looking to draft a DB there.
This post was edited on 3/25/12 at 6:22 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News