- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
PFF take on 32
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:01 am
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:01 am
6
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:02 am to geauxtigers87
PFF also said LSU had the best OL in CFB last year, just saying.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:02 am to geauxtigers87
Was the 20th overall pick on most mocks.
Allowed 1 sack.
Saints have an aging RT
But, but terrible pick.
Allowed 1 sack.
Saints have an aging RT
But, but terrible pick.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:03 am to geauxtigers87
Nah he sucks man.
I found a mock from the Erath Gazette that has him picked 56th
I found a mock from the Erath Gazette that has him picked 56th
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:06 am to geauxtigers87
I always love the local news Facebook posts after non-sexy positions are picked. AW MAN SHUDA TRADED FOR WATSON. WYD LOOMIS Y U NO PIC DFENZE. Just absolute cringeworthy garbage when Brees needs time to pass and there will be elite d available at the top of the 2nd thanks to the qb reaches.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:09 am to geauxtigers87
This is another solid, unflashy pick. Skill positions get all the hype, but championships are built on the lines. Both of the players we wanted most on defense had already been taken right before this pack, our next tier defensive picks should be around at 42, so we address another position of need and help get younger on the o-line. I have no issue with this pick, especially if we get a good lb or defensive end at 42.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:11 am to geauxtigers87
So they're saying we should have traded up for Foster and still get the #1 rated OT with 42?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:14 am to swamie
If we still have 42, what did we use to trade up?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:17 am to Melvin
32/103
9'ers gave up 34/111 I think
9'ers gave up 34/111 I think
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 12:18 am
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:18 am to kingbob
quote:
I have no issue with this pick, especially if we get a good lb or defensive end at 42
what if they go Kizer or Cook at 42? still feel good about it?
i'm just asking, as a hypothetical, because everyone is just assuming we are going to go defense with the next pick, but we've seen shite like this from Payton and Co. before... falling in love with offensive players and neglecting the defense... it's why we are in the shape we're in on that side the ball as it is....
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:19 am to chRxis
quote:
chRxis
We're like the spartans at thermopylae, brother. You and I understand.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:21 am to rmnldr
So much cringe
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News