- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: One more year for reggie!
Posted on 8/16/08 at 1:11 pm to Gridiron Guru
Posted on 8/16/08 at 1:11 pm to Gridiron Guru
quote:
the time & money the team has put in for him
Bingo! Bush isn't great; he isn't a bust. What he is is highly overpaid ($13.3 Mill last year and $12.1 Mill this year...it goes even higher in 2010 and 2011). His salary amounts to almost 10% of the entire salary cap.
Is he worth it? I guess he is, if they keep selling $110.00 "Bush" jerseys.
This post was edited on 8/16/08 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 8/16/08 at 1:23 pm to ChewyDante
quote:
Can we wait for Reggie's 3rd season to play out before we throw him under the bus?
he's not only a RB (and therefore should have had an easy transition), but he was the most hyped RB in years, and he is the highest-paid RB in the NFL
quote:
The dude is a unique talent,
i don't even believe this anymore
there are plenty of WRs who are very similar to reggie and would prolly run about as well if put at RB
Posted on 8/16/08 at 1:23 pm to adono
quote:
Is he worth it? I guess he is, if they keep selling $110.00 "Bush" jerseys.
$1 of salary cap space is worth a lot more than $1 in commerce
Posted on 8/16/08 at 1:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
$1 of salary cap space is worth a lot more than $1 in commerce
You got that right.
Posted on 8/16/08 at 1:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but he was the most hyped RB in years
so he's responsible for performing up to other people's hype? brilliant.
quote:
he's not only a RB (and therefore should have had an easy transition)...and he is the highest-paid RB in the NFL
absolutely legitimate concerns to have. I'm very aware that Reggie hasn't achieved what we hoped he would thus far, that happens sometimes, but its the NFL for Christ sake, sometimes you hit bumps and adversity. It doesn't mean that he won't attain that level at some point. He wasn't an every down back at USC either so I don't see why this is so shocking to people.
Our offensive line struggled early last year as did our offense in general. Deuce went out and Reggie struggled mightily. His rookie season demonstrated flashes of real ability and finished strong. Its his third season, give me a break.
And don't reference his stats as if that is the end all be all of the discussion, Reggie splits time at back in a pass happy offense and a quarterback who is a great ball distributor... I know its cliche, but stats can be misleading.
quote:
i don't even believe this anymore
You don't even believe he's a unique talent anymore? Geez, some people fall of the bandwagon hard.
If your refuting that he has unique talent than I think you're being ridiculous. Please don't come back on the Reggie Bandwagon when he gets his shite together... I mean you almost can't now after saying that.
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:05 pm to ChewyDante
quote:
so he's responsible for performing up to other people's hype? brilliant.
well i don't like to throw around the term bust, but busts are generally measured against this
i like to use his salary much more than hype, but you can't deny his hype coming in
quote:
Reggie splits time at back in a pass happy offense and a quarterback who is a great ball distributor... I know its cliche, but stats can be misleading.
stats aren't misleading in this respect
he gets a ton of receptions and a good # of receiving yards
the biggest problem is he is a RUNNING back and his efficiency (not total yards) running is below average. he hasn't even averaged 4.0 ypc yet, and he has what? 1, 100 yard game? 2?
quote:
You don't even believe he's a unique talent anymore?
no because i think he's a WR more than anything else, to be honest
there are a ton of 5-11, 200 lb WRs who run 4.35s and are agile
quote:
Please don't come back on the Reggie Bandwagon
when was i on it? i pretty much said reggie would do exactly as he has done and was not the right pick for the saints
*ETA: i still think the saints should bite the bullet and move him to WR for 85% or so of his snaps, and have him as the 3rd down back for the other snaps. reggie in the slot with colston/meachem = $$$ in a year or 2
This post was edited on 8/16/08 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:09 pm to TigerBait1127
I just asked for an opinion moron, i think reggie is an awesome athelete, but not an every down back so if you dont like my posts just dont reply!!!!
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:12 pm to whodatfan
frick off turd with your fat arse girl
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:13 pm to CraigBLSU
quote:
if you dont like my posts just dont reply!!!!
Or, why don't you just go back to not posting.
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:15 pm to Rickety Cricket
Just was asking for an opinion
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:17 pm to CraigBLSU
quote:
frick off turd with your fat arse girl
Good post.
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:17 pm to CraigBLSU
quote:
If reggie bush doesnt have a breakout year this year, i say we trade him before everyone else realizes he is a flop! Anyone agree or disagree
quote:
if you dont like my posts just dont reply!!!!
ETA:
You specifically asked people to voice their disagreement.
This post was edited on 8/16/08 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
stats aren't misleading in this respect
he gets a ton of receptions and a good # of receiving yards
actually they are. When you compare his rushing yards to those of other backs to support the idea that he's an average talent and you don't take into consideration a multitude of other factors that could affect that than its misleading.
quote:
the biggest problem is he is a RUNNING back and his efficiency (not total yards) running is below average. he hasn't even averaged 4.0 ypc yet, and he has what? 1, 100 yard game? 2?
He doesn't get as many carries as other backs, that affects the 100 yard games now doesn't it? More carries equals more opportunity to break some. Misleading statistic to reference. Although I will concede that Stecker and Thomas got consecutive 100 yard games behind the same offensive line, that is disconcerning to say the least.
No one's arguing with you regarding his production being sub-par here so far. It doesn't mean that he's all of a sudden an incapable back. How can you possibly give up on the guy as a RB so soon? I mean you'd have to be a pussy to just throw in the towel when things are going tough for you. Reggie thinks he can do it, Payton seems to think he can still do it, I think they have a little more insight on it. He has played TWO NFL seasons... TWO! Give me a break!
quote:
no because i think he's a WR more than anything else, to be honest
Reggie at RB fits this offensive scheme but not as a primary back yet as he hasn't shown the ability THUS FAR to carry that load on his own. But coming out of the back field on swing routes and being employed in a lot of different sets and formations as a decoy and for misdirection plays is an invaluable aspect of this offense. He will hit the hole from time to time as well. Lets see how he performs in tandem with a healthy power back in the rotation before deeming him an incapable back and relegating him to receiver only.
Like I said, I'm not refuting that Reggie is struggling from where we all think he should be right now, there's really no doubt about that, but giving up on his potential ability to get there so early on is absolutely absurd to me, all things considered.
This post was edited on 8/16/08 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:43 pm to ChewyDante
somebody please give me a list of the guys picked #3- #20
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:53 pm to ChewyDante
quote:
When you compare his rushing yards to those of other backs to support the idea that he's an average talent and you don't take into consideration a multitude of other factors that could affect that than its misleading.
deuce ran better in 2006
stecker and thomas ran better in 2007
people overrated that "multitude of factors"
quote:
He doesn't get as many carries as other backs
look to his efficiency, which is low. 3.6/3.7 ypc
quote:
It doesn't mean that he's all of a sudden an incapable back. How can you possibly give up on the guy as a RB so soon? I
when has he ever shown great running ability? not at USC
quote:
I mean you'd have to be a pussy to just throw in the towel when things are going tough for you.
it's about using his actual abilities and style to best suit the saints. that's at WR
Posted on 8/16/08 at 2:55 pm to ChewyDante
quote:
Like I said, I'm not refuting that Reggie is struggling from where we all think he should be right now, there's really no doubt about that, but giving up on his potential ability to get there so early on is absolutely absurd to me all things considered.
You've made some good points...but you have to weigh productivity against cost. The real question is: How long to do stick with a RB, who is more adapted to being a WR, at the highest salary on your team and in the highest paid RB in the entire NFL?
If Bush was making $3 Mill a year, we'd be saying he's earning his money. At $12 to $14 Mill, he's overpaid and a luxury that the Saints may not be able to afford.
This isn't the Saints' fault. The system is broken. Rookies getting 5 year $60 Mill contracts will break the bank and ruin the long term success of the team. How many top 10 picks has New England had lately?
This post was edited on 8/16/08 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 8/16/08 at 3:04 pm to adono
quote:
but you have to weigh productivity against cost. The real question is: How long to do stick with a RB, who is more adapted to being a WR,
I agree with this entirely. Its a dilemma for sure but I don't think that based on his 2007 season, which let's be honest, that's why everybody's all in a fit, that he can't be better for this team at RB. He didn't put up eye popping rushing numbers by any means in 06, and like SFP said, Deuce did (well not necessarily eye popping but good, and certainly better than Reggie). I'm fully aware of this. We reached the fricking NFC Championship game that year. Reggie can fit and contribute greatly to this offense from the RB position with a healthy and capable power back like to Deuce to compliment him and even share the backfield with in certain formations like the I.
Point being, Reggie didn't have a lights out rookie season rushing, yet we reached the NFC Championship game utilizing his unique abilities in concert with our other talent. Reggie was a vital part of that success, but so was Deuce and others. Reggie doesn't have to be LT at RB to benefit this team more at that position than WR IMO.
And just to reiterate, I'm just like everybody else, not convinced with Reggie yet and concerned, but not giving up on him yet either. Maybe if rookie contracts weren't getting so ridiculous this would be less of an issue.
This post was edited on 8/16/08 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 8/16/08 at 3:10 pm to TREY3tiger
Posted on 8/16/08 at 3:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it's about using his actual abilities and style to best suit the saints. that's at WR
I love how you're stating this as if it is fact. Its not by any means, its YOUR opinion. Reggie doesn't agree with you and obviously Payton doesn't either. I get your points and I see where you're coming from, but this is by no means a cut and dry issue. Its a dilemma. And look at from Reggie's perspective, he still thinks he can be a productive back, he's gonna work his arse off to show it this year. Let's see what 2008 brings before we go prematurely writing him off as a back is all I'm saying.
Posted on 8/16/08 at 3:13 pm to CraigBLSU
quote:
frick off turd with your fat arse girl
You've got to be kidding me, right??
99.99999999999999999999999999999999% of my boys on Saints Talk would agree and SAY:
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News