Started By
Message
locked post

NFL settles with former players! 765 MILLION

Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:29 pm
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64195 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:29 pm

These owners NEVER wanted to go to court. No telling what they have said and done behind closed doors.
I feel bad for season tic holders around the league(except atlanta)
Salary cap implications. Apparel and TV deals are all looking to change.





LINK

Wow!
This post was edited on 8/29/13 at 1:33 pm
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
21324 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:30 pm to
Link much?
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:32 pm to
Does this mean they can stop fricking up the rules now?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64195 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:34 pm to
Sadly I think they will now have one over riding rule: Make rules that make us more money!
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28854 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

One of the principle terms of the settlement is that the agreement "cannot be considered, an admission by the NFL of liability, or an admission that plaintiffs' injuries were caused by football."




LINK
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Does this mean they can stop fricking up the rules now?

As I understand it, the settlement was for past players/injuries. I don't see how it will prevent possible future lawsuits. But I'll defer to the legal eagles on this site on that issue.

So, in other words...

This post was edited on 8/29/13 at 1:48 pm
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:39 pm to
We're giving you money for your injuries.
But football didn't cause the injuries.

Gotcha.
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

quote:
One of the principle terms of the settlement is that the agreement "cannot be considered, an admission by the NFL of liability, or an admission that plaintiffs' injuries were caused by football."


That's actually pretty standard language in a lot settlements. If the NFL admitted liability it could possibly be used against them in future litigation.

This post was edited on 8/29/13 at 1:42 pm
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28854 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:43 pm to
yeah, I know. It just looks funny.

One odd thing is that they are giving the NFL 20 years to pay this settlement...
Posted by OldSouth
Folsom, LA
Member since Oct 2011
10940 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Does this mean they can stop fricking up the rules now?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64195 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:48 pm to
A better breakdown.
Love the last one.

(A) Baseline medical exams, the cost of which will be capped at $75 million;

(B) A separate fund of $675 million to compensate former players who have suffered cognitive injury or their families;

(C) A separate research and education fund of $10 million;

(D) The costs of notice to the members of the class, which will not exceed $4 million;

(E) $2 million, representing one-half of the compensation of the Settlement Administrator for a period of 20 years; and

(F) Legal fees and litigation expenses to the plaintiffs’ counsel, which amounts will be set by the District Court.





Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

kclsufan


I figured as much but a guy can dream, right?
This post was edited on 8/29/13 at 1:50 pm
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

(B) A separate fund of $675 million to compensate former players who have suffered cognitive injury or their families;

With about 4,500 players, that's about $150k per player/family. That's pretty much chicken feed. The NFL got the better end of that deal.
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40925 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

With about 4,500 players, that's about $150k per player/family. That's pretty much chicken feed. The NFL got the better end of that deal.



and $675 mil is also chicken feed to the NFL, sadly. this wasn't a great settlement at all for the players.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
22637 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

this wasn't a great settlement at all for the players.


Well, I guess they were looking actually having to prove that their particular injury came from football. Some are saying that this could have possibly taken years and they could have ended up with nothing. SO, I guess, both parties could say they win....or lose, depends on how you look at it.
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

and $675 mil is also chicken feed to the NFL, sadly. this wasn't a great settlement at all for the players.

Yeah I wonder if the NFL was threatening bankruptcy or protracted legal proceedings if the players didn't agree to this settlement.

Then again, the players are claiming cognitive disabilities, so maybe that had something to do with their decision.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28245 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Well, I guess they were looking actually having to prove that their particular injury came from football.


Absolutely. I think the former players were facing a tough fight proving that their particular injuries/illnesses were conclusively caused by playing football. $765 million is nothing to sneeze at, but with the amount of plaintiffs involved, that doesn't amount to an astronomical amount per plaintiff. Probably a good settlement overall because I'm sure niether of the parties are extremely happy about it (except for the lawyers).
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29365 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Yeah I wonder if the NFL was threatening bankruptcy or protracted legal proceedings if the players didn't agree to this settlement.

Then again, the players are claiming cognitive disabilities, so maybe that had something to do with their decision.

The real sad part in all of this is had the NFL just established some kind of veteran retirement deal a long time ago, they would've never gotten to this point, nor taken the PR hit.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:02 pm to
I cannot wait for the stories about former players blowing the entirety of their settlement money on dumb shite. Gawn be guud
Posted by Farva
Member since May 2009
789 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

One of the principle terms of the settlement is that the agreement "cannot be considered, an admission by the NFL of liability, or an admission that plaintiffs' injuries were caused by football.


This is indeed common language in most releases, however future litigants are not bound by the agreement.

So players who sue in the future can likely point to the settlement as an admission, unless otherwise barred by an evidentiary rule.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram