- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Michael Thomas trade
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:18 am
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:18 am
Word is Packers about to make a move for WR… yall think we would trade Mike???
13
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:20 am to lepdagod
He can’t be traded because we restructured his contract. It would annihilate our cap.
And no, even if we could, we shouldn’t. Even with him, a top 5 player at the position, WR is still our biggest position of need. The absolute dumbest thing this team could do is trade him.
And no, even if we could, we shouldn’t. Even with him, a top 5 player at the position, WR is still our biggest position of need. The absolute dumbest thing this team could do is trade him.
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 8:43 am
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:20 am to lepdagod
Yeah let's trade our best wr (even though he's a racist diva) for what exactly. Saints still been too cheap to sign anyone available so I'm thinking getting rid of Thomas at this point would be a dumb idea.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:21 am to lepdagod
Go f*** yourself
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:22 am to burke985
all the restructures do make it seem like we are keeping everyone.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:22 am to lepdagod
quote:
Packers
We’ll give them MT and Jameis for Rodgers
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:22 am to burke985
quote:
Saints still been too cheap to sign anyone available
Take a step back and think about this statement. Teams (if this is true about GB) are trying to trade for star WRs instead of picking up the FA WRs that are out there. And, after the teams trade away those star WRs, they aren't trying to scoop up any of the guys that are currently out in the market.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:26 am to lepdagod
No way you sell low
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:26 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
Take a step back and think about this statement. Teams (if this is true about GB) are trying to trade for star WRs instead of picking up the FA WRs that are out there. And, after the teams trade away those star WRs, they aren't trying to scoop up any of the guys that are currently out in the market.
I hope they plan on making a move for Olave or Jameson. We need a legit deep threat I think we are covered everywhere else with the squad we have now. Just having Thomas back in the lineup will make what we already have better.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:30 am to burke985
"racist diva" 
that's an amazing statement to make
that's an amazing statement to make
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:36 am to lepdagod
Packers traded away Davante Adams instead of paying him top dollar, why would they trade assets to pay Michael Thomas top dollar? Also trade would hurt us financially severely.
I'm surprised Packers haven't pursued Jarvis Landry, seems to me like he could fill that old Randall Cobb role pretty well
I'm surprised Packers haven't pursued Jarvis Landry, seems to me like he could fill that old Randall Cobb role pretty well
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:37 am to burke985
(Racist Diva) please explain?
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:38 am to JayJay2
quote:
racist diva" that's an amazing statement to make
I mean he can be a flower child drag queen idc, the NFL is a business and only cares about money he can have whatever opinion he wants that's what makes America great.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:42 am to floyd13
He's not truly racist, just ignorant like much of the NFL.
Doesn't matter at this point, just don't nuke the team from within (like calling out your future HOF QB for the most white bread statement ever) and you're ok in my book.
Doesn't matter at this point, just don't nuke the team from within (like calling out your future HOF QB for the most white bread statement ever) and you're ok in my book.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:42 am to Doug_H
quote:
I'm surprised Packers haven't pursued Jarvis Landry, seems to me like he could fill that old Randall Cobb role pretty well
Basically what I was getting at. There are a lot of name recognition WRs out there in FA and none of these teams that need a WR are trying to bring them in. It isn't just the Saints not trying to sign them.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:44 am to lepdagod
quote:
Word is Packers about to make a move for WR… yall think we would trade Mike???
absolutely...and then our OT too.
then jameis
league better watch out, we dont need no good players at to win
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:49 am to FMtTXtiger
quote:
all the restructures do make it seem like we are keeping everyone
This - when you restructure someone it basically signals that you aren't trading them anytime soon.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:50 am to lepdagod
Naw. Everything they've done says 'win now' (rather than retool/rebuild). No way they get rid of the best WR that we have.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:53 am to burke985
quote:The Saints are a lot of things but cheap is not one of them.
Saints still been too cheap to sign anyone available so I'm thinking getting rid of Thomas at this point would be a dumb idea.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 8:58 am to lepdagod
quote:
Michael Thomas trade
Love the idea, but would wait to make sure Olave or Willams are available at 16 or 19 before pulling the trigger.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News