Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Malcolm Butler Scenerio

Posted on 3/11/17 at 5:49 am
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7639 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 5:49 am
So just a thought on my part.

Orginal trade reported was pretty much this except add in Malcolm Butler and our second. We had to get rid of Cooks to save on his roster bonus. Butler had yet to sign his tender so can't be traded.

What if this isnt over and we still trade our second for Malcom Butler.

I wanted more for Cooks but if this is all we could get then i'm okay with it. A night of sleep helped.
This post was edited on 3/11/17 at 5:50 am
Posted by HollierThanThou
Member since Jan 2012
6209 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:36 am to
Butler + 1 + 3
For
Cooks + 4 + ?

Would certainly make the trade feel more even. Prefer it not to be a second rounder tho
Posted by gotiger
Delray Beach, FL
Member since Feb 2009
2775 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 7:42 am to
This was discussed last night already, but I agree. Will def feel better about it if we end up with a butler for a 2 or 3
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112338 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 8:34 am to
Pats can get a 3rd round comp pick in a year for Butler plus a year of production. Why would they trade for a 3rd rounder now?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram