- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Last 4 Picks
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:11 am
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:11 am
First 5 should be 1 G/OT, 1 WR, 1 ILB, 1 Edge guy, and I guess 1 CB. What would you go for the last 4?
5 - 148
5 - 154
6 - 187
7 - 230
Assuming that I'd go
Rounds 1-3: 1G/OT, 1 WR, 1 ILB, 1 EDGE guy, 1 CB
5 - DT
5 - G/OT
6 - Edge guy
7 - Tight End
5 - 148
5 - 154
6 - 187
7 - 230
Assuming that I'd go
Rounds 1-3: 1G/OT, 1 WR, 1 ILB, 1 EDGE guy, 1 CB
5 - DT
5 - G/OT
6 - Edge guy
7 - Tight End
This post was edited on 4/24/15 at 9:19 am
6
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:13 am to GMoney2600
i concur
eta:
wtf, i no longer concur
eta:
quote:
First 5 should be 1 G/OT, 1 WR, 1 ILB, 1 Edge guy, and I guess 1 CB
wtf, i no longer concur
This post was edited on 4/24/15 at 9:15 am
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:14 am to Chad504boy
Sorry, I hit submit, then had to go back and edit
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:20 am to Chad504boy
quote:
wtf, i no longer concur
What do you disagree with? We have to draft an ILB, Guard, WR, and 1 EDGE guy with the 1st 5. I guess you could take a DT or another EDGE guy instead of a CB.
This post was edited on 4/24/15 at 9:23 am
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:24 am to GMoney2600
based on your scenerio, I'd go
5-K
5-QB
6-QB
7-K
5-K
5-QB
6-QB
7-K
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:30 am to GMoney2600
quote:
What do you disagree with?
I'm not overly a fan of going G w/ the 13th, pick. I think we can do well with either 2nd or 3rd round picks. I think its important to swing for the fences at positions of higher impact than Guard. (Guard is important but not on the same level as a franchise front 7 player or a few other positions)
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:35 am to Chad504boy
I'm not saying that we have to go Guard at pick 13. I'm saying that a Guard has to be drafted within those 5 picks. I'm saying that we must draft 1G/OT, 1 WR, 1 ILB, and 1 EDGE guy with in the top 5 picks. The other position can be either DT, EDGE guy, or CB.
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:36 am to Chad504boy
There are a lot of scenarios that can play out here honestly it depends on who falls and if we decide to move up from 31 to snag them. Saints will make moves with as many picks as we have.
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:39 am to GMoney2600
Overall we have 9 picks. It's very likely that we take these 8 positions with those 9 picks:
2 G/OT
1 WR
1 DT
2 EDGE guys
1 ILB
1 CB
The last pick could either be another WR, TE, another CB, or another LB.
I would say RB, but I think we just take 2 udfa's and choose between them and Tim Hightower for our #4 RB.
2 G/OT
1 WR
1 DT
2 EDGE guys
1 ILB
1 CB
The last pick could either be another WR, TE, another CB, or another LB.
I would say RB, but I think we just take 2 udfa's and choose between them and Tim Hightower for our #4 RB.
This post was edited on 4/24/15 at 10:08 am
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:11 am to GMoney2600
Much more about value at the spots rather than positional need. Ex: Most are not too hot on drafting a DT. If Malcolm Brown or Armstead were on the board at #31 it could be almost a forced BPA pick.
Remember that Deuce was essentially that kind of pick. Ricky Williams had just completed a 1000 yards in 10 games season.
Remember that Deuce was essentially that kind of pick. Ricky Williams had just completed a 1000 yards in 10 games season.
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:28 am to GMoney2600
I'm not married to any position at any point. BPA should be the strategy minus a few select positions we are "stacked" at.
Forcing a pick out of need increases the bust potential.
Forcing a pick out of need increases the bust potential.
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:34 am to HollierThanThou
I agree. We'll most likely take a DT in the 3rd or 5th(These are the guys we should do most of our scouting on.) But if Shelton falls to 13 or Malcolm Brown falls to 31 then you have something to think about. I like the DT's at our 44 pick...but we have too many other needs at other positions right here.
This post was edited on 4/24/15 at 10:47 am
Posted on 4/24/15 at 11:03 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Chad504boy
Watson only a sophomore. I like where ya mind's at though. Draft him this year to get him next year to be Brees' hair parent.
Posted on 4/24/15 at 11:09 am to Midget Death Squad
he has been losing some on top
Posted on 4/25/15 at 9:12 am to GMoney2600
I could see them drafting a DT also in first 5 picks.
Also, don't be surprised if a QB is drafted.
Petty 2nd
Grayson, Mannion 5th
Also, don't be surprised if a QB is drafted.
Petty 2nd
Grayson, Mannion 5th
Posted on 4/25/15 at 10:41 am to GMoney2600
Some lineman depth(on both sides) would be solid in the late rounds.
A gamble on a WR like austin hill late would be nice as well.
A gamble on a WR like austin hill late would be nice as well.
Posted on 4/25/15 at 10:53 am to blueslover
Honestly, he should just rock the dome before it gets to this point. I'm not too far behind him and thats what I plan to do haha
Posted on 4/26/15 at 12:01 am to GMoney2600
quote:
First 5 should be 1 G/OT, 1 WR, 1 ILB, 1 Edge guy, and I guess 1 CB. What would you go for the last 4?
You should have clarified that you weren't necessarily saying in that specific order. I started to reply and say we need a LB first then I realized exactly what you were saying.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News