- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Morgan or Darren Sproles
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:43 am to Byron Bojangles III
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:43 am to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
Morgan is a poor mans Meachem. You cut Morgan 100% of the time.
Actually, Meachem might be the expensive man's Morgan.
4
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:47 am to JDat
Cut Devery
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:48 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Actually, Meachem might be the expensive man's Morgan.
I think San D would agree.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:49 am to Chad504boy
You still have to cut Morgan because of the match up problems that sproles brings. Morgan's upside is great but he hasn't proven that he can run routes well other than a bomb so IMO you have to go with sproles still.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:58 am to Chad504boy
Morgan easily
Our window is open now so we need the best players now now stars that will bloom in years.
Our window is open now so we need the best players now now stars that will bloom in years.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:00 am to elprez00
quote:
Damn, thats a hard choice, though.
No it's not really a hard choice at all. Bye Morgan.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:01 am to Chad504boy
I'm going to wait and see where Soulja stands on this issue.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:04 am to Suntiger
My original thought was going to be a Pierre Thomas or Joe Morgan thread.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:11 am to Chad504boy
quote:
My original thought was going to be a Pierre Thomas or Joe Morgan thread.
That's actually a tougher choice for me...but still not a tough choice. Also, I think PT and Sproles have salary cap implications where Morgan does not. Not sure though.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:16 am to Chad504boy
I feel like I should charge you by the hour if I choose to participate in this thread.
A irrelevant hypothetical with no right answer just to entertain you?
No thanks
A irrelevant hypothetical with no right answer just to entertain you?
No thanks
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:17 am to Pendulum
quote:
I feel like I should charge you by the hour if I choose to participate in this thread.
A irrelevant hypothetical with no right answer just to entertain you?
No thanks
I feel like I should punch you in the mouth for having just posted that hypocritical thought on a fricking internet message board built for the sole purpose of passing time and typing shite.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:23 am to Chad504boy
quote:
built for the sole purpose of passing time and typing shite.
maybe this explains the decline in quality here, if this is ST philosophy.
I come here for:
-News
-Relevant topics (ie, two guys that ACTUALLY might be in an either/or cut situation)
-Draft talk and prospects
-discussion of upcoming games or past games
I do not come here to fill bandwidth with empty space and I maintain a 2 day buffer before and after games to allow the explosion of dumb threads to subside.
So it's not a hypocritical post, it's just a post that disagrees with you.
And all you want is a debate/argument with no absolute answer, so I guess in a way, you are still getting what you want.
This post was edited on 12/26/12 at 11:25 am
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:26 am to Pendulum
quote:
maybe this explains the decline in quality here, if this is ST philosophy.
I come here for:
-News
-Relevant topics (ie, two guys that ACTUALLY might be in an either/or cut situation)
-Draft talk and prospects
-discussion of upcoming games or past games
I do not come here to fill bandwidth with empty space and I maintain a 2 day buffer before and after games to allow the explosion of dumb threads to subside.
So it's not a hypocritical post, it's just a post that disagrees with you.
And all you want is a debate/argument with no absolute answer, so I guess in a way, you are still getting what you want.
You should stick with Saints Report. I think they fit your style more.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:28 am to Chad504boy
Nope, because I'm still an a-hole. And this is a-hole haven when it comes to saints forums. I wouldn't last a week at saints report.
didn't p orly get kicked off of SR? and hes the hardly the most bannable guy on here. He's more of a kiss-arse
I love debates, even heated ones, as much as the next guy. But it has to be a topic that is worth debating about.
didn't p orly get kicked off of SR? and hes the hardly the most bannable guy on here. He's more of a kiss-arse
I love debates, even heated ones, as much as the next guy. But it has to be a topic that is worth debating about.
This post was edited on 12/26/12 at 11:29 am
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:30 am to Pendulum
quote:
Nope, because I'm still an a-hole. And this is a-hole haven when it comes to saints forums. I wouldn't last a week at saints report.
I love debates, even heated ones, as much as the next guy. But it has to be a topic that is worth debating about.
If you don't enjoy fun hypotheticals, then i can't help you. Click off the thread. Half of all sports conversations in real life are about fun hypotheticals. Should I start a "Should we cut Devery Henderson" thread for you?
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:31 am to Chad504boy
Come on now. Joe Morgan is a WR with 9 catches on the whole season. Sproles had 7 just last game and he is a running back.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:34 am to Chad504boy
nah, thats ok; I made this argument semi-relevent to this forum so that I could participate.
maybe a
Prob-Jabari, cassillas-vilma-shanle, pt-ivory, bunkley-Sed, montez-gallete
I don't know, just something that could be discussed that has the inkling of a possibility of some type of real life substance.
Just my advice to the debate thread king.
maybe a
Prob-Jabari, cassillas-vilma-shanle, pt-ivory, bunkley-Sed, montez-gallete
I don't know, just something that could be discussed that has the inkling of a possibility of some type of real life substance.
Just my advice to the debate thread king.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:34 am to Chad504boy
And still has almost 300 yards less than Sproles
Edit: Sorry more than 200 yards less
Edit: Sorry more than 200 yards less
This post was edited on 12/26/12 at 11:36 am
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:38 am to Noplacelikehome
quote:
And still has almost 300 yards less than Sproles
Edit: Sorry more than 200 yards less
take this fwiw, sproles has 588 yds total receiving. 483 are yards AFTER catch. Leaving 105 yard i guess "before" catch. 67 receiptions, that averages out to like a 1.5 yard distance catch. Props to him for the yac but he's getting basically extended fricking handoffs in space.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News