- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/17/12 at 6:08 am to Breesus
quote:
that said the players didnt do any of the stuff he asked of them.
Make assumptions much?
Posted on 4/17/12 at 6:50 am to OrangeCurtainTiger
quote:
Make assumptions much?
Can you show me a highlight of someone intentionally targeting smiths head, or twisting Gore's head sideways, or attacking Crabtree's ACL?
Posted on 4/17/12 at 7:28 am to Breesus
No highlights, but I can show you a player saying that he and his teammates were intentionally targeting a player with a history of concussions... except it wasn't a Saint, so the media doesn't care about it.
This post was edited on 4/17/12 at 7:30 am
Posted on 4/17/12 at 12:00 pm to Breesus
quote:
Can you show me a highlight of someone intentionally targeting smiths head, or twisting Gore's head sideways, or attacking Crabtree's ACL?
First off, this was over a 3 year period starting in 2009, not just this year's playoff game. Let's say they averaged 18 games a season so that would give us 54 games to review. If I had access to the lowlights, I'm sure I could come up with a few. My point is, you can't prove they didn't so you are making an assumption.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 1:30 pm to OrangeCurtainTiger
quote:
you can't prove they didn't
The burden of proof rests on the prosecution.
This tape was used as proof that Gregg Williams instructed his defense to injure players in specific ways in return for a cash payout during this specific game.
Now the burden rests on the accusers to show proof that the players either did that or attempted to do that.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 5:15 pm to cuddlemonkey
It's odd that the NFL is withholding evidence from the NFLPA when it's obvious this will hinder them from laying more wood in a situation where probably 31 out of 32 NFL fans would like to see them do so.
That begs the question: Does the evidence they have implicate other teams? That's the first thing that comes to mind and seems like a reasonable explanation for the secrecy in regards to the evidence.
It just seems odd that they can't offer the NFLPA representatives a shred of proof when they claim to have 18,000 pages of documentation.
That begs the question: Does the evidence they have implicate other teams? That's the first thing that comes to mind and seems like a reasonable explanation for the secrecy in regards to the evidence.
It just seems odd that they can't offer the NFLPA representatives a shred of proof when they claim to have 18,000 pages of documentation.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News