Started By
Message

re: Fujita first to speak truth or B.S.? You call it.

Posted on 4/16/12 at 9:02 pm to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59077 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

If the coaches wanted to form a union, i guess they could


the coaches are part of management,
Posted by OrangeCurtainTiger
Austin, Texas
Member since Oct 2009
105 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 6:08 am to
quote:

that said the players didnt do any of the stuff he asked of them.


Make assumptions much?
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Make assumptions much?


Can you show me a highlight of someone intentionally targeting smiths head, or twisting Gore's head sideways, or attacking Crabtree's ACL?
Posted by cuddlemonkey
Member since Apr 2011
261 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 7:28 am to
No highlights, but I can show you a player saying that he and his teammates were intentionally targeting a player with a history of concussions... except it wasn't a Saint, so the media doesn't care about it.
This post was edited on 4/17/12 at 7:30 am
Posted by OrangeCurtainTiger
Austin, Texas
Member since Oct 2009
105 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Can you show me a highlight of someone intentionally targeting smiths head, or twisting Gore's head sideways, or attacking Crabtree's ACL?


First off, this was over a 3 year period starting in 2009, not just this year's playoff game. Let's say they averaged 18 games a season so that would give us 54 games to review. If I had access to the lowlights, I'm sure I could come up with a few. My point is, you can't prove they didn't so you are making an assumption.
Posted by cuddlemonkey
Member since Apr 2011
261 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

you can't prove they didn't


The burden of proof rests on the prosecution.

This tape was used as proof that Gregg Williams instructed his defense to injure players in specific ways in return for a cash payout during this specific game.

Now the burden rests on the accusers to show proof that the players either did that or attempted to do that.
Posted by Hankster2
Member since Oct 2007
35 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 5:15 pm to
It's odd that the NFL is withholding evidence from the NFLPA when it's obvious this will hinder them from laying more wood in a situation where probably 31 out of 32 NFL fans would like to see them do so.

That begs the question: Does the evidence they have implicate other teams? That's the first thing that comes to mind and seems like a reasonable explanation for the secrecy in regards to the evidence.

It just seems odd that they can't offer the NFLPA representatives a shred of proof when they claim to have 18,000 pages of documentation.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram