Started By
Message

That J Val extension is looking pretty nice right now

Posted on 11/5/21 at 10:43 pm
Posted by AlabamasSalaryCap
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2012
2730 posts
Posted on 11/5/21 at 10:43 pm
I mean honestly for the trade value alone. This dude has a 2 first minimum price tag, IMO

Like if we just decide to blow shite all the way up.
This post was edited on 11/5/21 at 10:44 pm
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8826 posts
Posted on 11/5/21 at 11:10 pm to
Funny the thread about it lots of people were upset about it but really liked the Adams extension lol.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9787 posts
Posted on 11/6/21 at 6:05 am to
We would struggle to get a 1st for him. Other teams aren't even playing Centers against us and letting Val feast. He is putting up good numbers, but it's not moving the needle or getting us close to winning.

I'm not blaming him. But they are empty stats, just like Ingrams have been. For whatever reason them playing well doesn't get us wins. Teams let them get what they want. Bad defense? Bad scheme? Devalued position? It could be any or all of these.

Take last night. Val was our #1. Just 19pts and 5tos. He only took 14 shots. The Warriors are a small team. He should of had 20+ attempts. We were close at halftime.

I just can't be bowled over by good numbers in a blowout loss..
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 11/6/21 at 6:31 am to
27 points doesn’t win you a game in the NBA.

You are looking at this all wrong, and it’s not an uncommon thing Pels fans seem to do every year where they blame people like BI or Lonzo, or in this case Jonas, for not being able to collect W’s with shite rosters. As if the problem is somehow them, and not, you know, the guys that can’t get a bucket consistently and efficiently to save their lives.

At the end of the day you could replace Val with peak Lebron last night and you aren’t winning that game. Because at the end of the day you need multiple guys that can score. Your star player averages 30-10? Great, that’s at best 60 points he generated, the average NBA team this season scores around 108. You’re gonna still need other guys that can get you 50 more points still….and that’s assuming your team can hold opposing teams to league average.

And if the guys you put around your 30-10 guy are utter trash, you aren’t getting many wins even if it’s Michael Jordan
This post was edited on 11/6/21 at 6:33 am
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9787 posts
Posted on 11/6/21 at 7:42 am to
quote:

the end of the day you could replace Val with peak Lebron last night and you aren’t winning that game.


No. James would and has his whole career carried bad teams to wins in the regular season. That is my point. Some players just win more than others. I agree, the rest of the team is awful. But Val is missing something. The Raptors and even Grizzlies saw it. He is an old school Center and not a good defender. You just don't win with that.

He should be putting up gigantic numbers right now. We have nobody else over 210lbs on the court right now. He is all alone in the paint and every rebound is he. Plus he is the number 1 option. Do you really think other teams are impressed? Is this KAT level offense (I am not sure if the Wolves could get 2 1sts for KAT right now)?

Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17854 posts
Posted on 11/6/21 at 7:53 am to
The problem with his defense is that he has poor lateral foot speed. That means that, in the pick-and-roll, he really can't move his feet well to hedge against the guard coming around the pick, which means that the only option is for him to play drop coverage.

But drop coverage always lets the guard shoot a floater, so we get absolutely killed by guards who have good floaters as part of their game. That's why we've had some games where he doesn't play as part of the finishing five.

Jaxson and Billy have much better lateral foot speed and can hedge on the P&R, and playing different defenses keeps opponents off-guard, as the opposing guard can't know what to expect.

[Edit] And this is nothing new: Memphis fans warned us about this when we traded for him.
This post was edited on 11/6/21 at 7:54 am
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 6:14 am to
quote:

Memphis fans warned us about this when we traded for him.


see also:

loses poise vs as-big defenders and just flips the close shot up and intends to rebound.
vs Gobert he is worthless.

the trade looks good with zion out and hayes not ready for prime time.
reasonable 2 more year deal for a solid double double rain or shine. still positive speech waiting for zion.

Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 8:23 am to
quote:

No. James would and has his whole career carried bad teams to wins in the regular season


Nonsense.

Go pull up those rosters and let’s discuss.

At no point was Lebron carrying teams this shitty to the playoffs.

People talk about his Cleveland days, yet even in year two he had 5 guys around him averaging double digit points, a very solid front court anchored by Carlos Boozer and Ilgauskas, Ricky Davis and Jeff Mcinnis that could all knock down shots for you and get guys the ball.

Jonas is playing with a bunch of guys that would struggle to start on most teams.

And he is putting up gigantic numbers, 19-14-3 is damn impressive for a guy.

Jonas ain’t the problem my man.

And it’s the height of basketball idiocy to look at this teams struggles and blame the guy that has actually proven it when it matters

There are things to point to with Jonas that are problematic, like his defense, and it ultimately means that we are going to have to move on from him in the future, or find someone that can take his minutes in crunch, but he ain’t the problem with this team
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 8:36 am
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
3736 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 9:33 am to
He’s been better than everyone thought,


We really need Zion and BI back to see what we have.

Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9787 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:04 pm to
That was a very persuasive argument where you are actually trying to debate that LeBron James, at any age, would have the same measure of impact as a 30 year old Val..

I never said Val is a problem. I'm just not crowning the guy or overvaluing his inflated numbers in blowout loses. The OP is stating that this justifies his extension. I'd want to see more and see some success before I got too excited..
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

That was a very persuasive argument where you are actually trying to debate that LeBron James, at any age, would have the same measure of impact as a 30 year old Val..


That’s not what I said, try again.

You tried to make the argument that Jonas is nothing but empty stats because it doesn’t translate to wins. Questioned him as a player anyone should covet.

And I countered that you could hand us Lebron in his prime and he’s not winning that GS game, he’d struggle to get anywhere with this squad as it was against GS. Removing JV and giving him someone akin to the crap JV is working with.

JV is not the problem. Is he perfect? No, but he is amongst the least of our problems
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110877 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

But Val is missing something. The Raptors and even Grizzlies saw it. He is an old school Center and not a good defender. You just don't win with that.
He's not missing anything, he is who he is.

He's not a #1 option that will give you a winning team if he's your best player. He didn't come here for that. He's not being paid on that level.

quote:

He should be putting up gigantic numbers right now
Well, he is.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110877 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:20 pm to
double post
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 3:21 pm
Posted by Lugan Village
Member since Oct 2021
10 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:47 pm to
New to this team and board. Not a lot of talent on the floor with two of our best players out. Not impressed with devonte game, his shooting percentage sucks, his d might be worse. Huge surprise at the lack of depth on second unit..like our cupboard is bare. Re jv, he’s play stupidly well, not all sure y’all see what he brings in controlling the paint, rim, inside game. Hayes and Willie giving him no support, like cmon man..give the man someone to work with that is a legit good player like Ingram… we’re lucky to have him at a huge discounted rate..not sure what he saw in this franchise to give us his prime years…I hate rebuild terms, but man we got very little
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9787 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:47 pm to
I'm not putting words in your mouth. You compared Val to James in his prime. James would have destroyed the Warriors in his prime, especially with the Warriors playing without a Center or rim protector. He would have put up 40+ in the game and elevated the surrounding players. That is what he does. He is a top 5 player all time that you are grouping in with Val. It's silly..
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

He's not a #1 option that will give you a winning team if he's your best player. He didn't come here for that. He's not being paid on that level.


but $12.5 million per is very nice. you get 20 10 and a happy camper. if hes the 3rd or 4th option you still get the boards.
money well spent.

ingram will be back first. option 1.

This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 4:52 pm
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9787 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 5:51 pm to
Let's play the OP game. He made a very simple statement. Val would command 2 1sts in a trade. The post has been overwhelming supported.

Does anybody really believe this?

Can anybody name 3 teams that would trade us 2 1st round picks for Val?
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
6249 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 6:01 pm to
Cleveland bc they love big men

Memphis bc they now know Adams is trash and JJJ hasn’t taken the next step.

Toronto bc they have no centers.

I could list more.

I think you are being a bit hard on Val mate. I could see a desperate team at the deadline offering 2 future firsts if they had injuries or thought Val would bring them over the top. Personally I’d keep Val though. Griffs strategy of hoarding late firsts is not a winning one.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9787 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 8:01 pm to
Did you see the Cavs big men tonight? They aren't giving up on Allen or Mobley. Might be the best duo in a few years. Lots of potential there.

I can't imagine either the Grizzlies or Raptors. Shrewd FOs that don't make reckless trades. Center just isn't a premium position and teams aren't overspending for them. Like we shouldn't have done.

The Magic did get two 1sts and Carter for Vucevic. So there is a precedent there. Maybe I am just devaluing the position..
Posted by SouthMSReb
Member since Dec 2013
4422 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

Can anybody name 3 teams that would trade us 2 1st round picks for Val?


Literally almost any contender.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram